Anecdotal Evidence – Did we even have a chance?

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant 143]

This question will help us push the MGTOW psychology further. This is just a curiousity to see if there are patterns that give clues as to WHEN things go bad.

Psychology is a passion of mine, and although it is VERY VERY possible that ‘all’ women are ‘JACKED’, I want to see if there is a pattern. If nothing else, we can begin to determine how FAST things will go bad 🙂

There are many questions I don’t ask because I already know the answer.

This is a female Narc test. I already assume the Female Biological Imperative and Hypergamy and don’t ask questions concerning that.

1. How long was your marriage?
2. Were her parents divorced?
2. Was she the ‘golden child’ among other siblings?
3. (if not divorced) Did her mother and father have a relationship you would have wanted?
4. Could she be ‘SPECIFICALLY’ sorry – That is say, “Sorry I _____________. I feel really bad about that. I was wrong. I won’t do that again. EVER? In your entire relationship do you recall?
5. Did things go bad when you decided not to be controlled? (blue pill)

My answers: (2 marriages, so 2 sets)

1. 18 years
2. No
3. No
4. No
5. Yes

1. 2 years
2. Yes
3. No
4. No
5. Yes

This may all be off base, in which case just ignore this. I just thought this would be an interesting philosophy subject.

The theory is that ‘Golden Child’ women go ‘BAD’ MUCH faster.

—–
NOTE TO NEWBIES : This isn’t about finding a NAWALT. Of course the ‘contract’ of marriage (as well as the system that enforces them) favors women. What I would mention is that the PSYCHOLOGY of the stages (below) are just as bad or worse!

There are 4 stages to a woman’s psychology that are ABSOLUTE :

1. Pre-Marriage (their passion and affectionate stage, women DON’T exist this way after marriage. You become their property.)

2. After Marriage (You’re part of a ‘TEAM’. What you didn’t know, is that you’re not the leader of the team. You’re part of ‘TEAM WIFE’. The goal? Get ‘cash and prizes’ and ‘children’ if at all possible. [this is a woman’s creativity. They (subconsciously at least) believe YOUR SHARED child is ‘Her Creation’ – this is why she had no qualms about not letting you see your child or making you fight for whatever time you do have with your child. )

3. After Children (You’re now the full blown horse pulling the cart. You’re 3rd place if you’re LUCKY. You get crumbs of respect if you’re lucky)

4. After Children are Grown (If you’re the plow horse that managed to grind your way through the first 3 stages like a row slave on a viking ship, then you’re afforded a small level of respect – the same as afforded by the viking captain surprised that an old row slave lived and survived though the rest died at the oar, jumped overboard or fled for freedom)

Make no mistake.

[Old RottweilerParticipant 1520]

Women are crazy, some will even admit it.

I had an ex that was bi, she said she would never date a woman, they are crazy. Then she went on to prove her point.

I was talking to a friends wife, she agreed with me that women are crazy.

Women know. This society allows them to penalize men because women are crazy. You can’t win until things change. The best way to encourage the change is to go MGTOW.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

JustAnotherGuy wrote:

4. Could she be ‘SPECIFICALLY’ sorry – That is say, “Sorry I _____________. I feel really bad about that. I was wrong. I won’t do that again. EVER? In your entire relationship do you recall?

I seriously cannot think of a SINGLE time where a woman sincerely gave me a real apology. If they ever said “I’m sorry” it was attached with a qualifier, designed to shift victim status back onto themselves, despite their wrong doings. “I am sorry, that I am not perfect, and I don’t say and do all the right things!” “I am sorry you took it the wrong way when I told you I hated you and threw a coffee cup at your head.”

Luckily I don’t have to worry about any of this anymore. MGTOW.

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant 143]

Pedal, Run Row:

seriously cannot think of a SINGLE time where a woman sincerely gave me a real apology.

This is an ‘AFTER THE FACT’ (when it is too late) Narc test. I have easier ones for BEFORE the fact. Diagnostic questions you can ask anyone (man or woman) BEFORE hand (which is when it counts)

I wrote a book (about a year ago) called //8// The Narcissist Survival Guide

Didn’t publish it yet because I wanted to go through it and edit it and add anything I missed, but its super cool because I help regular people understand (using scenerios) how a narcissist FEELS given common ‘normal people’ situations, which accounts for their reactions.

..Plus diagnostics including:

A few questions Narc’s cannot answer. Bet ya didn’t know that there were questions they cannot answer! And you thought Blade Runner was just fiction! 🙂

[They don’t experience emotion the same as normal people, so they didn’t experience things in life the way people are expected to.]

They can be ‘outed’ with the right questions.

You can also confirm based on family dynamics and their feelings toward each of their two parents.

A Narc child will have one or two Narc parents. ALWAYS. Almost always one. Very rare to see two, unless the parents don’t spend much time together.

Usually one Narc and one Co-dependant (SLDD aka Self Love Deficit Disorder, [coined -correctly- by Ross Rosenberg]

You can FIND THE WUMPUS by looking at how the two parents relate to each other. If one is extremly submissive, you can all but bet your bottom dollar, you found your Narc in the other one.

And don’t be fooled looking for a ‘flamboyant’ Donald Trump type! Thats a ‘GOOD’ Narc!

The dangerous ones are the COVERT NARCISSIST. They use shaming tactics and subtleties over time – patiently. Sometimes they slip with outbursts of anger, but covert subtle actions are their modus operandi.

If you find a very submissive ‘parent’ and the other is quietly controlling? Don’t say I didn’t warn you!

Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

Family dynamics of at least one Narc parent:

If ONE child? The child takes on the traits of the parent the child ‘LOVES’ (relates to) most, usually the ‘Co’.

If TWO children? Almost always (95%+?) you have a ‘golden child’ (who will be the Narc) and the ‘black sheep’ who will be the ‘Co’ [often in adulthood, shuns the parents and family entirely]

If More/Many? Golden Child and Black Sheep exist, and the others are a spectrum. It doesn’t go by age. It goes by how you’re treated by the parent(s).

NOTE: Narcs cannot give unconditional love. Period. It is conditional based on performance. There is no exception.

Fascinating stuff. It was great fun researching and going beyond what (most.. not all..) ‘regular’ psychs refused to see even though it is right before their eyes.

Wanna know what *I* think? I think 95%+ of MGTOW are Co’s – That is loving ‘gullible’ people, who were magnetized to Narc women. Sorry. Just sayin’

Red Pill is another way of saying, “Time to get your SELF LOVE ON, BIACH!”

——

Narcissist : Looks for validation and admiration from everyone.

Codependant (SLDD) : Looks for validation and admiration from their CHOSEN one – at a certain age, they give up (since it will never come) and become a shell of a person.

..See how that works? 🙂

–Psychology is fun!

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant 143]

From Pedal Run Row : “If they ever said “I’m sorry” it was attached with a qualifier..”

I’m sure you guys already know this, but a REAL apology is simple.

1. Affirm that the complaint (for which you are apologizing) is true and accurate.

[..Or confess something for which you believe hurt the other person, then do steps 2 and 3]

2. Admit that the action was wrong.
3. Talk about what you are going to do to change things.

Easy peasy!

[EndParticipant 262]

My only problem with the whole thesis is that it doesn’t take into account environmental factors. All you can ever do with such analysis is assign probabilities. That may be beneficial to some. But underlying the probable behavioral expressions someone can exhibit, is a society that condones and even rewards women for eliciting a particular outcome. Change the environment to, lets say, a hunter gatherer society and all the probabilities fall apart as wildly different behavior is observed. Perhaps the simplest way to put it is that determining which women are going to go psycho is pointless in a society that rewards psycho women.

[BoarParticipant]

JustAnotherGuy wrote:

This is just a curiousity to see if there are patterns that give clues as to WHEN things go bad.

Answer: Guy meets girl.

End of survey.

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[Author]

Posts