And you though it was over…

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Never marry. I can’t believe this.

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/mar/11/woman-wins-right-seek-money-ex-husband-30-years-after-break-up-dale-vince

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[RoyDalParticipant]

In my blue pill days, I’d have said, “unbelievable!” Nowadays, I believe it. Like the Terminator, they just keep coming.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[MedicalScientistParticipant 159]

Meh, it’s pretty common since women always desire money and other financial assets… Hypergamy never dissapears.

"Never theorize before you have data. Invariably, you end up twisting facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts."

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

OMFG! This is f~~~ing mental!!!

Elizabeth Hicks, a leading divorce lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, said: “This ruling essentially paves the way for anyone without a completed financial order to bring a claim against their former spouse regardless of how long ago they divorced.

Why can’t she just say that she’s a misandristic c~~~ who loves destroying men’s lives, I bet she did so to instill fears in her husband because his dick refuses to get erected for her vigina, her saggy milk flags probably already killed that little general one week after their marriage.

Again guys, this proves how much women don’t care about the “money” unless it’s a lot of money.

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

I think this country is really trying hard to catch up and overtake Canada and Sweden to be the most feminist friendly place on earth!

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

So you expect £1.9 million from something that has nothing to do with you anymore? Are you f~~~ing kidding me?

He achieves success from divorcing this bitch and now he’s reeled back into the bulls~~~. Never get married in the first place.

[Anonymous 42]

That’s why I say; steer clear of the black-hole!
If it can swallow light, reaching through time and space is no problemo! Thanks to feminism the long arm of gynocentric law can span a lifetime!

If they could, they surly would reach into the here-after and enslave you past death!

Freedom from gynocentrocious feminism (now all Western women) is more than priceless! F~~~ those meat-hook toting bitches!

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10908]

I await the outcome of this.
If they think that men are saying no to marriage now, a verdict awarding her anything will steer even more men away from relationships and even further away from marriage.
Unbelievable.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Anonymous 0]

I can’t speak. The only thing a guy in that position could do is buy a used aircraft carrier and live outside the territorial limits of any country. This is what Aristotle Onasis did to avoid taxes in Greece. An island would work too. Sounds crazy I know but no worse than what she’s doing.

[AttonParticipant]

I’ve said it many times but I will say it again.
F~~~ Gynocentrism
F~~~ Women[not literally]
F~~~ the Legal System
F~~~ marriage
F~~~ the division of assets
F~~~ the government and f~~~ the courts
Long live MGTOW

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

And I thought the nail was already pounded into the coffin of marriage. If there was a firing squad with marriage as the target, there would be more bullet holes than meat…

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[OgreParticipant 5863]

North American MGTOW day is what Vegas is for.If we go International I’ll see you all in A-Dam.

The upside to this whole thing is the flipside of what her lawyer said.

It will be precedent setting. His Lawyers need to establish that he made his fortune only after he was free of her incessant whining, her demands of his time, and his worry of trying to meet her needs.

Only because of the end of their relationship was he able to become the valuable member of society who has paid so much in taxes. They need to turn around her claims that all come from entitlement, and lay out a scenario where she prevented his success prior to the split.

I’d dangle 300K in front of her as a thank you for raising his one child, one time only take it or leave it offer, and watch the fat little piggy jump at it.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[AscendedParticipant 698]

I didn’t. I see it as a persistent problem. No f~~~s given.

"We are free to follow our own path. There are those who will take that freedom from us, and too many of you gladly give it. But it is our ability to choose – whatever you think is true – that makes us human. There is no book or teacher to give you the answers, to show you the path. Choose your own way! Do not follow me, or anyone else."

[Dead_Channel_GrayParticipant 51]

Good lord, that photo of her. That’s what million dollar poon looks like?

I’ll stick to porn.

Small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

[Krab_AssParticipant 267]

Bunker, you said ‘Its is clear when you marry, you become a woman’s property’

I could not agree more! Even after my divorce, I live with the constant, nagging fear that any extra $$$ I make or acquire by whatever legal means – it will / could be taken away, even though I have been divorced for many, many years…
Just as police dogs are trained to sniff out the bad guys / bombs / drugs, WOMEN are inherently gifted to get money whenever / where ever.
When men marry – they are simply handing over all their resources to the female con-artist that they married.

"I care not what others think of what I do, but I care very much about what I think of what I do! That is character!"
~ Theodore Roosevelt

[God is DeadParticipant 63]

A genius that I look-up to named Benjamin Franklin once said “in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” I guess you can now add alimony to that list… MGTOW is the only solution.

I find it cunningly strategic that she waited decades until he was actually worth something to finally take him to court. Let me guess, she was the one who probably filed the divorce too?

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

here’s the latest update I can find. Really the only one needed.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-22450272

No ma’am. You get NOTHING.

Lord Justice Jackson said the court should not allow people to be harassed by claims for financial relief whichwere issued many years after the divorce and had no real prospect of success.

Score one for the good guys.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[equalism42Participant 23]

Glad I found this site. Just so as to warn others. I had a s~~~ marriage (more on that latter), but ended it and got legal help to do an agreed property settlement, which set her up in a house etc etc. I was left with the family farm a knife, folk, spoon and some farm machinery. We agreed on children staying with their mother but shared custody. However after it got finalized and taken care of she told social security she had custody, so they then made and order out for me to pay so much per month to her.
After twelve months of separation I decided to file for divorce, that went through ok and formally addressed her haveing child custody but me having child visits every second weekend. But then the ex started getting nasty then, she was caught intercepting my mail and was abusive to my friends when she came across them in the street. At one point a weekend was missed and when I phoned when would I tried to find out what had happened I got no reply, the next visit was missed too so I contacted the Police, as there had been a man hunt going on, on the news looking for a man that failed to show up when he was suppose to return his child… and there was no difference to what my ex had done to me except her gender. The Police told me not interested go see a solicitor and take her to court.
Eventually I struggled getting back on my feet and the children seemed happy with their visits and doing well….Six years latter after decree nessis and all I get a letter from a solicitor wanting all my bank details and to do valuations on everything I own and that my ex had filed for child custody.
Thousands of dollars latter she perjured herself in documents to the court, and with a cunning move by her barrister called an ‘open offer’ got 80% of what I had left at the time, the child custody claim evaporated and was only a ploy to get them to open a new property settlement. The court totally ignored the original amiable settlement documents.
I sort assurance from the court that the matter was now closed and told the court would not limit the number of times they would review a case.
The children have grown up now and hate her since the eldest son found by accident some bank books his mother had hidden in which she had almost a hundred thousand dollar stacked away yet was screaming poor to everyone. I thought about taking her back to court to try and get some back but the farm is lost and a life’s work is lost and after solicitors take there cut it is just better to keep totally away from her.
So it is never over till your life is destroyed, sooner you wake up and move on the better…

[F!@#GuiltParticipant 48]

Oh my god. I hope he wins this case. At what point does a court realize “ridiculous claim” matters? Is there no end? Good god this is depressing.

F!@#Guilt YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6hQIbzFPm5RBfsjm2pCGgA

[Red_Pill_SouljaParticipant 221]

Deadly Raver wrote:

here’s the latest update I can find. Really the only one needed.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-22450272

No ma’am. You get NOTHING.

Lord Justice Jackson said the court should not allow people to be harassed by claims for financial relief whichwere issued many years after the divorce and had no real prospect of success.

Score one for the good guys.

Unfortunately that article is dated 8th May 2013 and the OP’s article is dated 11th March 2015.

From Wikipedia:

“Divorce and financial claim court case[edit]
After Vince had made his fortune, Wyatt, who had lived what was later described in court as “16 years of real hardship”, lodged a financial claim of £1.9 million against Vince in 2011, nearly 20 years after their divorce. The Court of Appeal rejected the claim, stating it had “no real prospect of success” and was an “abuse of process”.[24] However, in March 2015 the Supreme Court set aside this decision, ruling that there was no time limit in law for claims for financial provision, and the claim could progress in the High Court.[25] Lord Wilson said the court must have regard “to the contribution of each party to the welfare of the family, including by looking after the home or caring for the family”, but the claim only had a prospect of “comparatively modest success” with a £1.9 million payout “out of the question”.[24] In a statement, Vince branded the court’s decision “mad”: “I feel that we all have a right to move on, and not be looking over our shoulders. This could signal open season for people who had brief relationships a quarter of a century ago.”[26]

Vince is paying legal costs for both parties, of over £500,000 so far, as divorce law permits costs to be charged to the combined resources of both parties.[25][27]”

– My guess is if it’s not ongoing, they did a private settlement.

[Author]

Posts