Anarcho-capitalism?

[CrimParticipant 31]

So I, personally, consider myself a pretty hardcore anarcho-capitalist. Seems to me that anything that has power to control (I.E western government) will eventually always fall victim to the will of the feminist movement. It makes sense from a female perspective. Why would they need to be a decent human being to a decent man, when they can just let their natures spring freely and have cops and politicians steal money from a decent man and give it to the female?

Western government seems to be completely permeated with feminist ideology.

I reckon that the only “Fair” societal system would be one completely devoid 3rd party enforcers that can be controlled and manipulated by women, men as well. I am often called an asshole for believing that there are simply a lot of people living today who would be better off by not being alive. That some people should NOT reproduce, that genes matter, work ethic matters, etc…

Would anarcho-capitalism be a dog eat dog society? Not necessarily, but I do believe that it would force people to either become decent, hard working, productive members of society…or it would force them to die more quickly and let the rest of us enjoy a better, more reasonable world.

What say you?

[FrankOneParticipant 1417]

But would they die?  If government did not comprise 40% of GDP as it does in the U.S., wouldn’t private charity increase as people had more resources?  And charity bestowed by private entities would be conditional — unlike entitlements, for which you must merely meet criteria to get monthly checks. And costs would be contained, unlike many governmental entities and agencies. A simple example: what percent of disability claims are fraudulent?  Why do so few people go to jail for this?

It is not accurate to blame feminism for all bad governance.  Identity politics certainly plays a role. Many groups are vieing for their special treatment, and virtually none advocating equal treatment.  VAWA, the tax code, and much modern law is just that — special treatment and identity politics.

Western government is permeated by redistribution of income and wealth, and special treatment of people and entities such as corporations.

[EekParticipant 1162]

Sorry, but your title made me giggle and reminded me of…

Dennis the Peasant

[heads-upParticipant 320]

“The global socialist have a master plan of immasculating men.

Glad we are all waking up.”

I concurr for what thats worth Stealthy ,only I think its “some” waking up but that maybe growing.Nice work with the metals by the way,wish I had that kind of forethought and fiscal intuition.

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

There are some thought provoking perceptions to be found in your thread, Crim. Only recently I took a step back to think about the whole picture as it presents itself to me and I came to the following conclusion:

“Money is merely but one of all efficient methods to bribe (or control?) any person…

… the others in any repeating sequential combination are are fear and hope (and maybe love whenever pretended)…”

And this gentlemen in my point of view is the very core inane essence of any political government and/or media behavior with the simple purpose of keeping the whole herd of us average lemmings under control, basically feeding the masses alternately back and forth with bad news ( =fear) and good news ( = hope) in part to keep everybody confused or too busy about the actual situation in question and on the other hand, because in every human life there is a constant “up and down”, which we all by nature again define as: “Hey, that’s life…”, hence we tend to interpret this cycle as normal if you will.

The trouble of late I think is “they” are slowly but gradually running out more and more of sending out the “hope signals” as “they” are equivalently coming to their own creative wits end. It is the same tenacious lengthy process that is also noticeable, as the one in which more and more people are slowly waking up and “smell the coffin” as the saying goes (and that in part includes people amongst “them”, too, only within those circle this process is going even slower, since naturally people in power tend to stick to it like clingfilm  —> see “force of habit” which is also a typically human trade).

Therefore the, let’s call it “conscious collective” (within both sides of the “givers and takers” as well as “the shakers and movers”) will have to eventually realize, that there is no alternative but to let the current system ultimately crash. As one documentary (of around 10 to 15 years ago) once put it quote on quote: “We currently live in the best and worst of all times…”. Now, try to think about this strong statement for a while and do make an effort to take your own conclusions from it and how it might effect you.

My personal answer is: Do your best and take it with a big pinch of salt (as in humor)…   … this is my own definition of the “enthusiastically lethargic approach” to the whole pathetically muddled up situation, to which nobody, not even the brightest minds can currently hardly have any decent common sense-like answer …

 

Just my two cents here.

 

Hang in there, gentlemen, after all there is only so much each and every one of us as human beings can do to cope and all the best…

 

Ned T.

 

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[MKBParticipant 51]

Crim wrote:

I am often called an asshole for believing that there are simply a lot of people living today who would be better off by not being alive. That some people should NOT reproduce, that genes matter, work ethic matters, etc… Would anarcho-capitalism be a dog eat dog society? Not necessarily, but I do believe that it would force people to either become decent, hard working, productive members of society…or it would force them to die more quickly and let the rest of us enjoy a better, more reasonable world. What say you?

I do not like it when one people says what another person should do or what “matters,” that is the opposite of MGTOW. You are not being an asshole for being honest. You are an asshole because you blatantly think you know what is best. The only reason that you think that some people should not reproduce is that you think that you are better than those people, that you are superior. Female level of arrogance right there. In addition, You want an economic system that forces people to be decent and hard working or they will die off. Men are usually not this ignorant when it comes to tyranny. Let me improve your idea, instead of pushing the unproductives to die, we will allow the productives to make the unproductives slaves, that way the productives can be even more productive. I am not interested in returning to the tribe system, the native americans lost. Crim, your base instincts rule your mind and you are making choices that we have left behind 5000 years ago. You do not sound like a woman, but for someone wanting freedom you sure like the idea of having it taken away.

 

I prefer Individualism with more anarchism than liberalism. I do not like capitalism. I am interested mutualism, but it is still far from practice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualist_anarchism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutualism_(economic_theory)

 

Whenever I deal with conspiracies I always ask one question, If this answer is wrong what else could be responsible for this problem? I do not like conspiracy theorists because they tend to have narrow thoughts. For example, If the jewish illuminati does not exist then what could be the cause of this depression? Conspiracy thoerists just say the jews did it when the truth is that it is was a complete failure of the, lets say capitalist, economic system. Believers of capitalism will not be able to say it was the flaw of the system they follow. They say the jewish bankers did it, their organization is called the illuminati. The illuminati can be a legitamite secret organization of wealthy jewish bankers that almost no one knows about, but that does not mean they are at fault. Even if the illuminati was controlling and abusing the system, it is still the fault of the system for permiting such abuse. The theorists can not place blame on their belief because they are unable challenge their belief and create something better. They pick something that is difficult to prove so they will not have to encounter the truth, similar to blaming god, or find a related target to lynch. I have a few of my own conspiracies, but I always assume I am incorrect, similar to innocent until proven guilty. Lynching and Blaming god does not help anyone.

[Author]

Posts