ALL women are like that; but perhaps ALL women are not entirely at fault

[EricParticipant 8]

Throughout these early stages of what I call my “Epiphany of Self”, I have found myself a detached observer, shockingly able to objectively examine the dynamics that had previously befuddled me. One question from which this new perspective brought clarity was “Yes; all women are like that. But how did they all get that way?” This post is as much an affirmation to myself as an offering to my self-liberating brethren.

I cannot, upon reflection, lay the blame at the feet of women of the “Greatest Generation”, of which few are still with us. Throughout my life, in the vast majority of discourses with them, they are predominantly unantagonistic toward men. Having been reared in what popular femdom has labeled “The Oppressive Patriarchy”, they tend to be satisfied with progress that was made in the actual gender equality, and appreciate the benefits afforded them in the double standards of their day.

I also cannot entire fault those in their 20’s and 30’s, for believing that up is down and black is white. They have been indoctrinated and reared on an unending diet of unqualified entitlement fantasy. As absolute power corrupts absolutely, the indulged-heir-turned-despot is a archetype even amoung men.  Considering the time many of us spent in the blue pill nightmare before awaking to our own agency, and the numbers that yet remain there, we can understand the rare occasion of, and uncommon strength required in, shedding an oppressive miasma. Even without the biological impediments in play for women, think of how difficult it must be to free oneself of a misconception from which you benefit.

The true serpent in the garden of feminine groupthink seems to be the Boomer Divas. Having been raise with the protections, providences, and prerogatives bestowed upon them under traditional gender dynamics, they launched a wholesale perversion of both male indulgence and female initiative. Usurping the mantle of gender equality, they used it to cloak the advancement of the inequities proposed by what had been theretofore recognized as the lunatic fringe. Up was down merely because they desired it so; black became white as it served their unqualified claims. They came to exemplify the boomer era undercurrent of, not only wanting to have their cake and eat it as well, but to consider the universe out of balance if a constant stream of baked good was not delivered to their table without expectation of payment.

Perhaps the results of MGTOW progress is the only hope for the women of this generation to free their own minds from the manipulative philosophical betrayal of their immediate forebears. It cannot, in truth, be said that MGTOW is good for society, any more than it can be claimed that a sinking ship benefits from able seamen taking to the life boats; it can only be similarly understood. We can only hope that as today’s women find themselves at the helm of a hull-torn vessel, they will at some point shift the ultimate blame from those who are, at long last, abandoning the bilge pumps, to those who convinced them to navigate toward the shoals. Just my two cents in…….

[MyselfParticipant 353]

Eric wrote:

One question from which this new perspective brought clarity was “Yes; all women are like that. But how did they all get that way?”

In my opinion the fundamental catalyst was the birth control pill. Giving women the ability to unilaterally control their reproductivity has lead to enormous societal shifts that are far from working themselves out.

 

 

[Anonymous 18]

Hi,

Interesting post. I would like to take a few points.

Eric wrote:

Throughout my life, in the vast majority of discourses with them, they are predominantly unantagonistic toward men.

I believe that women, similar to sales agents, insurance brokers, scam artists, etc have to give out the persona of charm, vulnerability, fragility to attract males by first disarming and seducing them. On that account being ‘unantagonistic’ just serves their own purpose. I don’t believe it has anything to do with respect to fellow men or out of sheer congeniality.

Eric wrote:

Having been reared in what popular femdom has labeled “The Oppressive Patriarchy”, they tend to be satisfied with progress that was made in the actual gender equality, and appreciate the benefits afforded them in the double standards of their day.

I agree that women take (and they should) benefit of what’s at their disposal. They would be stupid not to milk the system that’s heavily designed to be in their favor. However, being a male I only consider (as I should) the expense of my own well being in creating the system there is. I have no sympathy or empathy for the women raised under the ‘Oppressive Patriarchy’ ideology. Because I believe it’s not nurturing but more of what’s in their nature. Women aren’t actively taught to be the way they are today, modern society merely grants them the freedom to be whoever they are/want to be. The parasitic tendencies are just expressions of selfish coded in their DNA.

Eric wrote:

Even without the biological impediments in play for women, think of how difficult it must be to free oneself of a misconception from which you benefit.

I agree a 100%. That is exactly why MGTOW was created by men for men. I, for one, am not waiting for women to create and join WGTOW, and discard the societal biases that exist in their favor to join the rank of men under equality. How difficult is it to free myself of the misconception that I can cheat, lie, steal, abuse? Not difficult at all. Because I face consequences of my actions. Women don’t.

Eric wrote:

Perhaps the results of MGTOW progress is the only hope for the women of this generation to free their own minds from the manipulative philosophical betrayal of their immediate forebears. It cannot, in truth, be said that MGTOW is good for society, any more than it can be claimed that a sinking ship benefits from able seamen taking to the life boats

The only hope for women of this generation to free their minds is honestly all up to them. When I step out of the equation of being played and used, how they are or not, barely makes any difference. There will really be no results of MGTOW progress beyond giving men on individual basis a chance at happiness and fulfilment without the indoctrinated validation of a woman. MGTOW isn’t for society. It’s not even for men, I believe; it is for one man, to be used and gained from on his own terms. And lastly, if a sailing ship can be a metaphor for modern society then the seamen are modern women who legally have all rights to claim all the life boats on the ship. Men are the ‘women and children’ in this sinking ship.

[Anonymous 5]

Anonymous wrote:

I believe that women, similar to sales agents, insurance brokers, scam artists, etc have to give out the persona of charm, vulnerability, fragility to attract males by first disarming and seducing them. On that account being ‘unantagonistic’ just serves their own purpose. I don’t believe it has anything to do with respect to fellow men or out of sheer congeniality.

This perspective is a great analogy of the NAWALT to AWALT syndrome of all relationships.
I see the best example being those with special talents like musicians, sportspeople, actors etc. Their managers on the other hand usually have no talents what so ever in many cases and many more, their talents are questionable at best.
In the courting phase these managers will be extremely nice, understanding and genuine to the core. They’ll be everything that the special talent is looking for in that they’ll protect, promote and nourish the life needs of the special talent as an individual.
However, as soon as a contract is signed and ownership is legally binding, things change.
The change these days isn’t nearly as drastic as changes in the past when many managing contracts were so extremely one sided and lengthy.
The old studio system in Hollywood was a great set of examples.
Just like women, many of these managers often claim the success of their “managed” is mainly, if not all because of them. The truth is often the opposite.

Elvis Presley suffered under the tyranny of Colonel Tom Parker almost his entire career. It was an open secret he hated what he was doing but he was under contracts and had no choice. It made him one of the most miserable people alive, despite his enormous talent and success.
It wasn’t till after Elvis died that the obscene one sided monetary benefits that Colonel Tom Parker extracted from Elvis were greater than the monetary rewards Elvis was getting himself.
In hindsight, with the publishing of a number of accounts of Parker’s managing decisions, he was an enormous hindrance to Elvis and never believed at any stage that Elvis would have more than two or three years of success left.

Marriage contracts on the other hand have gone in the opposite direction with no fault divorces enabling women to terminate at any time for any reason or no reason what so ever.
The result is a windfall when the children’s rights are considered paramount with the powerful rebuttable presumption being that the women keep the children, and hence the accompanying windfall. No accountability of any type of money spent is required, hence the abuse of the law.
The incentives for the legal divorce industry at every level compound the abuse.
The combination of no fault divorce and the windfall in the courts have turned the marriage contract into a nightmare for males.
All women know this, they know this from the very beginning. They knew it when they were girls growing up. Most men become aware of it, too late. Hence the subordinate role and walking on eggshells while living under the constant unspoken, unwritten threat of financial and personal devastation for any reason or no reason what so ever.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Eric wrote:

But how did they all get that way?”

In my view, women’s behavior is the result of millions of years of selective breading for survival traits, then being released into an environment without real threat to their survival. In other words, they are wired up to behave this way — but their behavior is not designed for a world of abundant resources and little danger.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 13]

No, of course it isn’t their fault, its just their momma’s fault – and of course the white knight corrupt politicians and their mangina constituents – and the white knight entertainers and their mangina consumers – and momma – she was a brainwashed selfish narcissist – partly the result of a crony capitalist extreme socialist nation and economy propogating a utopian fantasy.

 

It is not just women, we are living in an age that promotes solipsism, in media and academia.  The mega rich – the capstone if you will – is selling a cheaper form of their sybaritic lifestyle to all of us – to keep us dependent herdable little groups of categorical drones – able to be manipulated.

[martygParticipant 103]

They are ALL women, the are ALL at fault. They all have female brain wiring, female hormones, female DNA, they can not help it. The only ones who are even more at fault are the men that put up with them.

[Anonymous 13]

@myself:  I agree with you.

Myself wrote:

In my opinion the fundamental catalyst was the birth control pill. Giving women the ability to unilaterally control their reproductivity has lead to enormous societal shifts that are far from working themselves out.

Myself wrote:

In my opinion the fundamental catalyst was the birth control pill. Giving women the ability to unilaterally control their reproductivity has lead to enormous societal shifts that are far from working themselves out.

Saying the most unpopular thing regarding social functions is usually the most accurate assumption.

[Author]

Posts