Alimony

[WallyParticipant]

Sorry if this is a repost but I think it’s to important

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/02/pf/taxes/alimony-gop-tax-plan-deduction/index.html

I used to consider myself a Republican many years ago always thought Reagan was the Grandfather I never had when I was a kid.

No more, traditionalism, Gynocentrism are the same thing which has the plan to enslave us.

Don’t get married
Don’t co habitate

If you live with a woman they will just change the laws to make you pay alimony, check out what they do in Canada.

This is just more “let’s put it on the backs of men. They won’t complain they will just do it!”

No!

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

Wally wrote:

No more, traditionalism, Gynocentrism are the same thing which has the plan to enslave us.

Tradcons are the flip side of Feminist.

They both make Man into a F~~~in Plow Hoarse Utility Item to PAY for the HOE as well as be FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE to rai$e the next generation of taxpayers whether YOU are involved beyond YOUR Checkbook is immaterial.

SINGLE MEN, KEEP WALKING AWAY FROM ALL OF THIS !!

MARRIED MEN, CASH OUT WHEN YOU CAN, AND NEVER RETURN TO THE PLANTATION !!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Point Of No ReturnParticipant 4074]

Alimony in any form is abuse.

Know when it is your duty to give them zero explanations for your actions.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

I am able to respect some women: those who made their own way with their OWN money and their OWN talent, and those who are obedient to their husbands.

Under no circumstances can I ever respect a woman who took or is taking alimony. It’s simply theft, pure and simple.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[Anonymous 13]

Absolutely it’s theft.

If someone wants out of a marriage and the comforts it provided then why the f~~~ should the other have to maintain the leaver/cheater/dumper in the lifestyle of the marriage.

NO.

If you want out then F~~~ OFF.

Build your own f~~~ing life.

C~~~S.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

I’m a little late to this thread. If you have a signed divorce decree by December 31, 2017 then the alimony is still deductible to the payer and income to the receiver. After that date, it is no longer deductible to the payer and not income to the receiver. That means that cupcake will get less money because Justin Case will have to pay her in after tax dollars.

Also, the payer is typically in a higher tax bracket than the receiver. So there will be less money left over to pay to the poor struggling single mother. The one advantage of the old system was that I could take the deduction at 28% and pass it on to mommy at say 15%.

Let’s say I pay $1,000 in alimony under the old system. I save $280 in taxes and cupcake pays $150. There is an extra $130 there from the difference in the tax rate. She has $850 after tax. Under the new system, I would pay tax on $1,000 and have $720 left to pass on to cupcake. SHE is $130 worse off since she is the recipient.

This new law should be bad for mommy. Either that or more men end up in jail because they can’t afford their alimony.

Order the good wine

[Author]

Posts