Alimonies for cohabitation is law in Italy

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

No marriage. No procreation. NO COHABITATION!

It’s just that simple.

And never, ever, under any circumstances bring her back to your home. Don’t even let her know your address if you can help it. Always go to her place.

Let the women wonder: “Why can’t we find any Good Men™?”

Because that is not our problem.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Anonymous wrote:

Right now it’s cohabiting, but then it’ll be dating, then it will be one night stands, and then it will be a facebook follow. You’re never going to win.

This has to be the dumbest law passed in a while. Phoenix is right- you’re never going to win the game. Dating is probably next. If you choose to date the blonde bitch down the street, she will one day retroactively want compensation. Going forward, I will never take a woman to my home again.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

cyberguy94 wrote:

in our country.

Dear god you are boned son.

State of Modern Italy after reading the OP-
Pasta status: Hard and stale
Pizza: Fallen upside down on the floor
Luxury Sport Cars: Fiat’d
Wine: Full of collapsed cork and oxidized
Men: Cucked

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

i keep repeating myself, but brothers, go monk.

And buy a sexbot, when they come in the market.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Faust For Science wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

SINCE THE VERY FIRST DAY OF COHABITATION when the cohabitation ends:

So, a “one night stand” is considered “cohabitation”.

You have to take residence together.

Anonymous wrote:

Being celibate used to be weird for me. Now it’s becoming a wiser choice than I first thought.

Leave it to mother nature to… no wait…

Leave it to self-preservation.

Hah, that’s irony at it’s finest as both are from nature.
However, in reproduction vs. self-preservation, self-preservation rules on the hierarchy of needs.

Celibacy is by far the wiser choice, that’s sure. But I cannot do it, not now.
I’m stil too weak.

Anonymous wrote:

Men always think they can sneak around the law and will be one step ahead of women, but women and the government will always just change the rules whenever they want.

That’s why you have to choose either to rule yourself or just accept it and submit. Whenever I see men talking about chasing pussy and how they are always going to be in control I know the vast majority of them are right on the edge of the cliff, most of them are going to plunge headlong into it in short order. Very few men can dance at the precipice, what with women looking to push them in and the government blowing strong winds to push them off as well.

Right now it’s cohabiting, but then it’ll be dating, then it will be one night stands, and then it will be a facebook follow. You’re never going to win. You can either keep running ahead of it all or just sidestep and avoid women and become minimalist.

Next steps will be:
1) criminalising men who buys sex.
2) bachelor tax.
Then, after that, I guess they’ll try to crack down on porn: I expect some reactions against that.

cyberguy94 wrote:

Bah, ho trovato moltissimi redpiller consapevoli e riflessivi in mezzo ad alcuni tradcon con cui non sono d’accordo. E’ pur sempre un bastione italiano contro la merda dittatoriale femminista autoritaria manipolatrice

Considera che l’utero in affitto pone l’uomo nella condizione di dover pagare oro per il valore intrinseco del corpo della donna e che potrebbe danneggiare moltissimo il nascituro. Sono favorevole all’utero artificiale (in futuro) ma contrario a quello in affitto

PS: I’m sorry anglo/american friends, this is the last italian message i’ll write, we’re eventually gonna speak via pm next time, i promise

Si, molti sono a posto, ma nel complesso il sito fa il gioco del nemico perché ci sono almeno un paio di moderatori che sono tradcon duri e puri e di fatto si trovano spesso daccordo con gente come la Zanardo, nei fatti.
Non capisco che c’entra il prezzo: non metti mica al bando le Bentley perché costano troppo, stessa cosa per l’utero in affitto – poi se confronti con quel che ti costa mantenere una donna, capisci bene che non costa poi molto.
Inoltre se fosse meno osteggiato e più diffuso costerebbe la metà, che è sempre tanto ma più ragionevole.
Sui rischi: propaganda femminista – è quasi uguale ad un’inseminazione artificiale, e se usi la stessa donna per ovulo e utero è del tutto identico ad un’inseminazione articiale. Hai mai letto articoli contro i rischi da inseminazione articiale? Io no, neanche sui siti maschili…

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[mp357Participant 531]

the laws are similar in canada, any man who thinks its worth it to shack up with some chick and lose all your s~~~ just for access to vag is beyond me.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

when this law becomes the death blow to the Italian society, I will only have this to say.

Dear italy:

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

I predict
“manbreathing” and “dickhaving” as the next crimes on the state/women’s list.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

Maybe that is the feminist goal. To eliminate all marriage.

That’s the irony of it, for many feminists marriage is ‘female oppression’ and they DO want to end it.

They do our job for us, and it’s the rest of the women who will suffer.

[Anonymous 2]

Eric Lauder, you are absolutely 100% right about the situation in Australia. I am staying away from women like Beelzebub from the water cannon…

[cyberguy94Participant 81]

Here we come, Italy

http://www.breitbart.com/news/italy-set-to-double-baby-bonus-to-fight-birth-rate-apocalypse/

[Author]

Posts