A woman capable of logic?

[Honorable_Juice_BoxParticipant 591]

Here we see a rare instance in which a human of the female variety is able to apply logic and reasoning to the actions of males within the same species:

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22567]

Is has reached a point where critical thinking has become a rarity in both genders. Women are worse because they are rewarded by the state for their foolishness and irresponsibility.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

No. Women are driven by emtiona and feelings. But are to subjective to be rational.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 29]

When ever I hear word’s like high value man/male, it only re enforces the fact of a person being regarded as a chattel, an item, a machine to be used. She lost me at that point entirely.

The logic she is using, is female logic, make no mistake. As someone who provides advice, she is soft core at best.
She neglects to say that regardless of race or colour, men make better carer’s of other men’s children, but men prefer to
father their own kids. That is why there is so much reservation getting tangled up with a woman and a tribe of her kids.

Additionally, again she fails to touch upon the subject of where this man will be in the general pecking order in this new family unit.
She is being willfully dishonest or ignorant to the fact that in this family unit he well be at the bottom of the pile.

She or her kids will always take first place. Lets not forget that a third or even a fourth party may be involved as well.
The big brother, courts, and any residual/past partners of her’s who may effect this new family unit.
So I guess that leaves you in the lowliest position motherf~~~er’s

This is how I separated wheat from the chaff for decades.
Make no mistake, regardless of colour, race, or financial status, it will almost always be the same.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Jack is the man…!!,

[BudtaoParticipant 293]

DeepInThought wrote:

Jack is the man…!!,

<iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/6Y9BukEBI9c?feature=oembed” allowfullscreen=”” frameborder=”0″ height=”375″ width=”500″></iframe>

I swear there should just be a tag in the forum for that video. It gets used so often.

Nirvanna is never having to worry about a woman ever again.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

This is so damn sad. She’s justifying women having multiple kids that aren’t married. What a f~~~ing c~~~.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Women did future generations of women a great disservice by pushing to make single motherhood acceptable. I know hot single moms that can’t get a decent guy to stick around…average or below average single moms have literally no hope. Once the first kid is popped out, if things don’t work out with baby daddy…women probably face a 90% or higher chance that they will never be nothing more than a pump and dump for all men in their future.

The most hilarious part is the ones that don’t want to date guys with kids because he’s already paying child support and broke, or the ones that have kids but don’t want any more. Why the f~~~ would some guy without kids that might want kids agree to raise yours and not even get any of his own out of the deal lol.

Oh well, not my problem…they can enjoy that bed they so comfortable made for themselves lol.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Honorable_Juice_Box wrote:

Here we see a rare instance in which a human of the female variety is able to apply logic and reasoning to the actions of males within the same species:

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/OJAMh7avRSg?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Thanks for posting. It is rare to see a black person with the guts to be critical of black society. In medical school during my OB/Gyn rotation I followed a young black woman through her out of wedlock pregnancy and helped deliver the baby. On a family visit I saw that she lived in a household of several generations of women who had all gotten pregnant without “benefit of clergy” and lived on welfare.
The funny thing is that the father of her kid wanted to do the right thing and marry her but SHE didn’t want to. Now the poor kid is going to grow up with no men in his life.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

No. Women are ruled by emotion. Look at the title of the video.

White men are afraid to date her.

No, bitch. That’s like saying men are afraid to eat a pile of s~~~. It’s common sense. Boils down to shaming language as always because there is no logical reason to date this c~~~, so she tries to appeal to emotions.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Silverstone the Second wrote:

No. Women are ruled by emotion. Look at the title of the video.

White men are afraid to date her.

No, bitch. That’s like saying men are afraid to eat a pile of s~~~. It’s common sense. Boils down to shaming language as always because there is no logical reason to date this c~~~, so she tries to appeal to emotions.

She is explaining to the dumb single mother in very non-pc terms why no man would date her. Very logical.

[WolfParticipant 890]

Gotta love how the writer frames the question: why are men afraid to date me?

She’s in her 20s with three kids….perhaps she’s an irresponsible whore that offers no value to a new man, other than possibly appearance. The YouTuber touches on this briefly.

She likely doesn’t work, or makes a very low salary…perhaps a decent man is not interested in financially supporting her and children that are not his?

There’s probably more than one baby daddy involved…perhaps a decent man is not interested in the challenges and drama that come with that?

Above is just a few examples. The bottom line: there’s no fear here; rather, it’s a cost/benefit analysis of being in a relationship with her, and the costs will far outweigh the benefits.

Of course, the writer of the question will not see it this way. She’ll say she’s “worth it” based on zero logic – just her emotions and what she was raised to believe: women good, men bad. She deserves to be happy, and men should sacrifice for her happiness. If they don’t, shame them.

I can hear it now…

“Men are afraid of me!”

“I’m strong and independent!”

“If you can’t handle me at my worst, you don’t deserve me at my best!”

This kinda of s~~~ is getting really old.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Wolf wrote:

Gotta love how the writer frames the question: why are men afraid to date me?

You picked up on that too. GOOD EAR.

The well-indoctrinated go-to response a woman will always say before asking ” are men just not interested in me?”

• “Men are afraid of a higher earning female”.
• “Men are afraid of commitment”.
• “Men are afraid of growing up and getting married”.
• “Are men afraid to date a single mother with 3 kids from multiple dads?”

But here’s why it fails:

It doesn’t require “courage” to date a single mother with 3 kids.
It requires >>>> stupidity.

It sure doesn’t seem like women are capable of that kind of logic. Has anyone ever heard a woman say “there goes a winner who’s just not interested in me?”. Of course not. He’s just an “asshole player (or loser)” who’s “afraid of commitment”.

A woman capable of logic?

I’m sure they are …. “capable” of it. So what? Being “capable” doesn’t mean jack s~~~.

Have you ever tried to teach a woman logic?
MGTOW Member T.Bowden once said “Teaching women logic is like trying to smell the color 9”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[WolfParticipant 890]

Keymaster wrote:

Has anyone ever heard a woman say “there goes a winner who’s just not interested in me?”

This made me laugh my ass off!

I wholeheartedly agreed with you. From the female perspective, It’s always his fault. He’s not a real man. He’s afraid of commitment.

It’s a basic defense measure on the part of women, which they may not even be conscience of. It’s completely foreign to them that a guy may be seeking the full meal deal of marriage and kids, but just not with her.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Wolf wrote:

Keymaster wrote:

Has anyone ever heard a woman say “there goes a winner who’s just not interested in me?”

This made me laugh my ass off!

🙂 There was a trendy expression years ago “he’s just not that into you” and when it came on the scene before it was a movie , it was like a new concept that just blew women’s minds. When a woman exclaims “Why didn’t he call? What a jerk!” she REFUSES to accept he just doesn’t like her.

Some guy stepped up to the plate and gave it to her straight “he’s just not that into you”. Suddenly she was all dumbfounded – like she never considered it before — and it took her a couple of minutes to accept it.

Look at THE FIRST reaction from Sarah Michelle Pfeiffer ( or whatever that 3-named horse face is called ). Like “OMG that’s outrageous!! how DARE you say that!!” like it’s unthinkable. THAT’S damn near every female attitude out there. There couldn’t possibly be anything wrong with her.

That a man is just not interested is totally, utterly, and in all other ways……. inconceivable.

It even takes “the smart one” a couple of minutes to wrap her head around it. While the hamsters sitting with her are doing cartwheels looking for any other kinds of rationalizations.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[The Skank SpankerParticipant 1372]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

No. Women are driven by emtiona and feelings. But are to subjective to be rational.

Let me remind you who wrote “The Manipulated Man”, exactly, a woman.

Yes, a vast majority of women are ruled by emotion and feelings, but some are capable or rational thinking too.

[WolfParticipant 890]

Keymaster wrote:

When a woman exclaims “Why didn’t he call? What a jerk!” she REFUSES to accept he just doesn’t like her.

Agreed. It shouldn’t be difficult to understand. No action is a decision. No call means he’s decided that he’s not interested.

But no, women can’t accept that. He’s just a jerk for not calling. Even if she accepts (unlikely) that he’s doesn’t like her, she still wants the to be called and told such. This gives her the opportunity to get dramatic and somehow save face in her irrational thought process.

The Skank Spanker wrote:

Yes, a vast majority of women are ruled by emotion and feelings, but some are capable or rational thinking too.

Very true. And let’s not forget that they are quite capable of rationalizing the security that marriage to a stable man provides.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

The Skank Spanker wrote:

Jan.Sobieski wrote:

No. Women are driven by emtiona and feelings. But are to subjective to be rational.

Let me remind you who wrote “The Manipulated Man”, exactly, a woman.

Yes, a vast majority of women are ruled by emotion and feelings, but some are capable or rational thinking too.

I agree. Though they are indeed rare there are actually a few who get it. Let’s not ignore the few who are on our side though other women call them traitors. Let us not forget Christina Hoff Sommers who understands us men a lot better than most women and manginas do.

[MattNYCParticipant 2329]

Keymaster wrote:

totally, utterly, and in all other ways……. inconceivable.

Fantastic movie!

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22567]

The Skank Spanker wrote:

Yes, a vast majority of women are ruled by emotion and feelings, but some are capable or rational thinking too.

Yes. A major part of that is the difference in upbringing. Those women whom can critically think were not taught “princess mentality”. That does not mean they will not use situations and laws to their advantage. It just means these women will think though the possible consequences of their actions, before they take those actions.

[Author]

Posts