A theory (for entertainment purposes only)

[L.E.O.MParticipant 120]

I’m just gonna float this scenario: men build the world, foster civilization, society, technology, and protect women for thousands of years. One day, the women start to complain: they’re bored, they want more, they want to vote, etc. Their voices and complaints grow louder and louder. Some wise men get together and conclude that this will not go away. They also know that for every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction. So they intentionally give in, and promote feminism, knowing that in the long con, the reactionary forces will come into play and the world will be primed for a REAL patriarchy, with the carte Blanche being given to Muslim immigrants but one of the symptoms of this long con nearing its completion. Plausible? ComPlete horses~~~?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

I’ll just leave this here. “For entertainment purposes only”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

@ L.E.O.M. : Quite plausible. But then —> The metaphorical pendulum has swung into one direction for long enough.

During this year it may just about appear at its stationary position before swinging back which is inevitable…

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[L.E.O.MParticipant 120]

I agree regarding the position of the pendulum. If it swings back in my lifetime,29, if one were to look at the entirety of recorded history, feminism in its current form would look like a tiny half assed movement that reared its head for a few generations and then disappeared. I’d like to believe future historians will be saying things like “remember feminism? No, what was that?
Ha, funny story…”

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

It is well known to me from growing up in Soviet Union from the words of the russian version of the revolutionary song “L’Internationale” that in order to create the new world order, first you have to demolish the old one to the foundation and then rebuild on that foundation. Typical Machiavellian order out of chaos strategy. So that’s one of the intentional and unintentional purposes of feminism – breaking up families and replacing them with the authoritarian state

Elites want total tyranny and domination. Control of reproduction, production, money, movement, thoughts, air, water, food, energy, history, media, education, children – everything
All the means of control are already in place and ready to be used. But to the certain extent we still have freedoms, sovereignty, individualism, access to information, families, religions. And that prevents their plans from fruition so far. They have to wipe out all of that before moving on with their NWO agenda. Feminism is a great tool to take care of some of that. But I’m not really worried about feminism much – it’s just a catalyst, but not the primary weapon. Nuclear war would be needed to really make a dent in all that’s remaining of the old world.

“…If you say in the first chapter that there is a rifle hanging on the wall, in the second or third chapter it absolutely must go off. If it’s not going to be fired, it shouldn’t be hanging there.”

Anton Chekhov

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3726]

The elites are using feminism to bring in the theocratic conqerors.

Never attribute to conspiracy that which can be explained by sheer incompetence.

I think feminism in it’s modern state is basically a fad. When a whole generation realize that it has basically screwed them out of family and the kind of happiness that that can (not necessarily does – no guarantees) bring, I think you’re going to see a pretty sizable backlash.

Problem is, by that time, Men will have changed considerably too, in fact we already have. Even in Euro-mangina land – look at that cruise ship that overturned a couple years back in Greece. You remember when they interviewed the survivors and they were saying they were shocked *SHOCKED* that men weren’t letting women into the exits/lifeboats first.

I say “welcome to equality baby.” You asked for it, you got it toyota.

The social contract is broken, and women are the one who broke it, not us.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3726]

Russky wrote:

Nuclear war would be needed to really make a dent in all that’s remaining of the old world.

Considering that there are enough nuclear weapons right now on earth to destroy all human life more than 150 times over, I suspect feminism would be the least of our concerns in that scenario.

[Side note: if you’re curious about just how powerful “modern” nuclear weapons are, check this out.]

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Mister Man SmithParticipant 285]

Russky wrote:

(…)But to the certain extent we still have freedoms, (…) access to information.(…) Nuclear war would be needed to really make a dent in all that’s remaining of the old world.(…)

I wouldn’t be so sure, not with all the shadow bans on Facebook and Twitter, I myself have a small YouTube channel, just for a bit of fun, not monetised, but a few weeks ago I noticed if people clicked to see my channel, it would say I had no videos there.
I complained for weeks on YouTube feedback tool until it was restored, so frankly even YouTube is tainted.
As for news websites, well, don’t even get me started.
The internet in general is pretty controlled, 10 years ago it meant companies were just showing you stuff you liked, for example, they could figure out if you were right of left leaning, politically, and then when ever you searched for political news they’d only show you favourable news to your political vision.

Today it’s not a matter of “they’re watching you” it’s a matter of “they’re not letting you see everything” what they block is more often than not the most important things.

mistermansmithmgtow.blogspot.com

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

Survivor wrote:

The elites are using feminism to bring in the theocratic conqerors.

Problem is, by that time, Men will have changed considerably too, in fact we already have. Even in Euro-mangina land – look at that cruise ship that overturned a couple years back in Greece. You remember when they interviewed the survivors and they were saying they were shocked *SHOCKED* that men weren’t letting women into the exits/lifeboats first.

Yup, women have been knocked off their pedestal. They can thank feminism for that 🙂

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[Anonymous 24]

Collectivism preys on the weak. Control media/propaganda and you can get anything done. What those in control hate the most is people who demand sovereignty.

[Anonymous 24]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

Survivor wrote:

The elites are using feminism to bring in the theocratic conqerors.

Never attribute to conspiracy that which can be explained by sheer incompetence.

I think feminism in it’s modern state is basically a fad. When a whole generation realize that it has basically screwed them out of family and the kind of happiness that that can (not necessarily does – no guarantees) bring, I think you’re going to see a pretty sizable backlash.

A fad promoted by mainly Jewish controlled left wing media that has the masses voting for a woman who has been a part of the establishment for decades. An establishment that is all about providing Israel with money and never ending military support by invading countries that Israel does not like. All the while looking the other way in regards to their humanitarian crimes and nationalistic/fascist ways.

And that my friend is what you fail to see, yet it is all indisputable.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Anonymous wrote:

A fad promoted by mainly Jewish controlled left wing media that has the masses voting for a woman who has been a part of the establishment for decades. An establishment that is all about providing Israel with money and never ending military support by invading countries that Israel does not like. All the while looking the other way in regards to their humanitarian crimes and nationalistic/fascist ways.
And that my friend is what you fail to see, yet it is all indisputable.

Joe, I agree with you on the issue of Israeli aggression but cannot agree that this is supported by so-called left-wing media. The right wing in this country are the staunchest supporters of Israeli imperialism since it is most representative of Western imperialism. The idea that the media is some kind of left-wing monolith falls short since the media is owned by right-wing corporations.
A perfect example is the supposedly liberal NY times who were cheerleaders for the imperialistic Iraq war because many of the members of the executive board of the Times were also stock holders in the oil companies. They later apologized for their position when the facts were disclosed and public opinion turned against the war.
Both left and right wing politicians in this country, representing the wasp controlled media, are exploiting Jews and Israel in their fear of another Holocaust to perpetuate another example of Western Imperialism in the Middle East.

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

Feminism is just female nature.

The minute that women do not need men to pay for their food and shelter they abandon men.

They jump ship.

From the book feminine mystique women decided they were not happy being house wives and since then their happyness has gone down and down.

Women not being happy is part of their nature.Its part of hypergamy.Women are always thinking that they can do better and they are not as happy as they can be and THAT is the way they have always been.

Regardless of what your grandmother told you or how she acted or pretended to act.And they do not give 1 single solitary F~~~ how men feel.Women did not evolve to care about how men feel.Women evolved to utilize men to get what they and their children need to survive .

Think about how females, especially human females evolved.

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[Author]

Posts