A small victory for men…

[ManocalypseParticipant 321]

Nice to see justice done for once:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-33121969

No doubt some ignoramus feminist will absolve the mother all blame and suggest the system somehow “biased” towards men but still, let’s enjoy the moment. Is the tide starting to turn?

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

You know this case really p~~~ed me off.

Had it been the dad that ‘abducted’ his child, there would have been a police manhunt, media outcry, magazine articles about the heartbroken mother.

I’m glad he got his son back but she will f~~~ing walk with a token slap on the wrist.

The media are on her side.

Disgusting.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I wish the tide was turning. I really do.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[ManocalypseParticipant 321]

Just to bring us back to reality her mother was jailed for 10 days for contempt of court along with her partner…who got 28!

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Manocalypse wrote:

Just to bring us back to reality her mother was jailed for 10 days for contempt of court along with her partner…who got 28!

I understand that but they were jailed for lying to the court. They didn’t kidnap the child.

However, the mother did but I suspect she’ll get less than her mother.

Again … whatever happens to her, she WILL get less than if it were the father (male).

She had the child removed from her by the court for not allowing contact with the father.

So she has basically s~~~ all over a system that was alrady loaded in her favour …. but no … still wasn’t good enough for her.

What she wanted was the father OUT no matter what the court said.

Nobody is going to tell her what to do with HER child.

[SteveParticipant 462]

I’ve been following this case and it’s unbelievable the amount of support I’ve heard for the kidnapper, I mean mother.

Good to hear kidnapper and son will “get all the support they need”.

The message to any woman out there is that is ok to do this and we will support you afterwards.

She should be made an example of but of course she won’t be.

F~~~ing disgusting.

 

[treelville..miamiParticipant 893]

Must be nice to break the law with no consequence. This woman should be in prison for abduction of a minor but feminazis rather enable this behavior. These women claim equality but act like children when they dont get their way, disregarding the system but expect men to abide to this s~~~, Yea f~~~ off already.

"The wounds of honor are self inflicted"

[experiencedParticipant]

Reads like  Monty Python Canterbury Tales from hell on acid. She’s ASSuming authoritah at every twist and turn, that she created. Excuse me, who is the criminal here, let alone the one who defied the courts. If shoe were on the other foot – yes, he’d end up like William Wallace drawn quartered hung…

They are safe??

Pukingly nauseating considering the damning quantity of male suicides from said injustice system!  The guys are being killed by this system without breaking the law, and yet the skanks literally break and defy it with their actions and get… nada. That’s right, til anyone hears differently.

Where’s, “being held without bail” here?

Hint: when laydeez eyes/nose/mouth appear closer and closer on the same face, it’s not due to discipline or self control.   Long live the pig?

With the rate so high, how long before men under this system start taking judges with them to prevent what keeps happening to other men there.

@manocalypse thank you for the article.

OK so the “hearing” is on Monday, we will be “listening.”

 

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[ManocalypseParticipant 321]

I heard a news report on the radio and had the locals having their say and it was all “hope they’re safe” and all that crap. One of them was a man and he said (and I quote) “I’m on her side!” I s~~~ you not. What the f~~~ is up with people?

[experiencedParticipant]

Right.

It should be, “I hope the boy is safely away from the perpetrator and back with his dad.”

The criminal is:_________.     The victims are:_____, _____.

It’s that simple.

The revolting hypocracy is that all you ever hear from that neck of the global woods is, “Oh the royal couple this, Oh the royal couple that, the royal family this, the royal baby that.”   We’ll see how much ‘royal’ is applied Monday. Logically she should get less access to the kid compared to before her crime.                    LESS.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I fear we may all be disappointed on Monday.

If we’re not …  I will eat my ham sandwich 😃

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

Look at her eyes in the third picture.
Eyes full of crazy.

I would not approach this woman, seriously.

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[Author]

Posts