Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › A Prehistory of Violence
This topic contains 17 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by Maraudrz1 2 years, 3 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Hi Gents,
Apologies in advance if anyone else has posted a similar theory, but I thought I’d share these thoughts with you all. We’ve all been mystified at times by women’s fickle nature, who can’t get enough of you one day and turn it off like a tap the next. It dawned on me that mankind’s violent nature and history has helped shape women’s mental wiring. Basically, females of any species are units designed to churn out little copies to ensure the survival of the species, and their own genes.
Before society evolved with its rules and taboos, fertile women would have mated with as many different (fit) males as she could, to acquire as much different genetic material as possible, in the hope that at least some of her offspring would live long enough to reach puberty and continue the cycle. But occasionally, inter-tribal conflicts would have occurred and these would have been violent and bloody, with the weaker, gentler menfolk on the losing side being slaughtered, and the womenfolk being taken off as prizes. Thus, these captured women would then have access to new, stronger, genes to mate with. At a stroke, this constant thread of conflict and violence throughout our history explains 3 of the peculiarities of women’s minds: Their inability to love as deeply as men, their obsession with extra marital sex, and their hybristophilia (sexual arousal induced by violence).
It’s my opinion (and experience) that the vast majority of fertile women never move beyond the infatuation stage of a relationship. In ancient, violent times this was probably a mental safety mechanism to help women deal with the loss of a partner and move on quickly to another mate. So in the early stages they lavish you with sex and affection to draw you in, and the oxytocin rush is literally addictive on both sides. For men it often deepens into real love but ladies need the “feelz”, which diminish over time. Along comes Chad with his dangerous air, sweaty armpits (pheromones), impulsive charm and ready wit (ever noticed on dating sites how many women “just want to laugh again”?). Before you know it, her knickers are stuffed in her mouth and he’s banging her long dick style. Women are designed to do this. She needs his seed inside her to make more, different, little copies. Women are stoned to death in certain countries for adultery, yet they still do it, they can’t help it.
Also, if you’ve ever witnessed a fight outside a bar or a club, how many women are milling about in the background? Instead of getting the f~~~ away from the danger zone, they’re soaking up the drama and screaming, adding to the tension. We all know why, don’t we lads? They’re getting off on it. Anyone who’s ever watched the scene in Quadrophenia after the mod/rocker battle (where Jimmy finally gets to hump Steph as they’re both so high on adrenaline) will understand. Adrenaline has similar effects on men and women to testosterone, which in caveman or Viking times would’ve meant lots of jiggy-jiggy for the lucky winners of a fight to the death.
So as society collapses and more women revert to their natural, feral state, it is now commonplace to see women with multiple children from several different fathers, who are happy to be the f~~~ toys of low-lifes and drug dealers. The constant drama of being around these strong, sociopathic men, who actually care very little for their women, provides that steady supply of excitement and adrenalin with which to fuel their primal addiction to rough sex with strong men and emotional stimulation.
To those who would argue against this theory: If this were not true, why are so many imprisoned male serial killers inundated with fan mail and marriage proposals from women? Are these women hoping to bring out their gentler side – or do they recognise a fellow traveller?
Great post. Women can go f~~~ themselves for all I care.
I’m thinking that your “theory” is only potentially applicable to Men that are seeking “relationships” with women.
In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash
Fair point Awakened, now I know what I know I won’t be bothering my arse with relationships again 🙂
So as society collapses and more women revert to their natural, feral state…
I will give as much f~~~s as is left in my F~~~s Given box: 0
Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!now I know what I know I won’t be bothering my arse with relationships again
When it comes to relationships;
I will give as much f~~~s as is left in my NFG box: 0
In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash
I really like your analysis. It is very similar to mine and but some would disagree. I, however, will not.
I will add that the whole “Romeo and Juliet” fantasy females so love is just another, sleep with one of the enemies bad boys…a murderer of your own flesh and blood.
Just a search for better genetic seeds.
Studies of chimps show that they follow the same dynamic. Most inter tribal chimp fights do not end in physical violence but more shows of violence like throwing rocks.
But, in the evening the women from each different tribe secretly sneak off and have sex with alpha males of the opposite tribe. Probably some eye contact was made at the fight.
Women need strange. That’s why we have night clubs and men should dump that bitch if she wants “girls vagina’s night out”.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Fair point Awakened, now I know what I know I won’t be bothering my arse with relationships again 🙂
It’s never the same once you know the truth.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
Spot on Cid. Add to the fact that women have not evolved like we have it’s no wonder they still continue such habits.
Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος
Even if interesting this argument misses the main point.
Cheating is NOT a problem in itself.
Cheating is a problem if a man is trapped in a marriage contract and when there aren’t laws allowing paper abortion / financial abortion for men (it allow men to give up to their duties and rights on the child).Why I’m highlighting that?
Because human biology (female nature) CANNOT be changed.
So, what’s the point in blaming biology?
Laws, on the other hand…SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Hi to everyone who’s responded, and thanks for your comments. Eric L observed that its biology, which can’t be changed, and this is true: All of us here know that women can’t be trusted. All I was trying to do was root cause analysis on WHY women can’t be trusted. The older hands here instinctively know this stuff, but I thought it would be useful for newer members and lurkers to have it presented as a short essay.
I would buy this theory only in so far as society is hunter/gatherer. I don’t think it holds true for organized relatively safe and secure societies; even ancient ones.
And you asked and answered your own question: “why are so many imprisoned male serial killers inundated with fan mail and marriage proposals from women?” You answered this in paragraph #2 “hybristophilia”
Understand I’m not trying to be a critic, its an interesting theory and you put a lot of thought into it, I’m just suggesting that the paradigm changes a little when moving from hunter/gatherer to say an ancient Rome or Athens.
Of course as Gambit points out the safe approach is to have nothing to do with them and then it isn’t a problem.
Hi to everyone who’s responded, and thanks for your comments. Eric L observed that its biology, which can’t be changed, and this is true: All of us here know that women can’t be trusted. All I was trying to do was root cause analysis on WHY women can’t be trusted. The older hands here instinctively know this stuff, but I thought it would be useful for newer members and lurkers to have it presented as a short essay.
If there would be:
Financial abortions for men.
Real “innocent until proven guilty” when you’re accused by a woman.
Then you wouldn’t need to trust a woman, it wouldn’t matter what she could do.
All you would need in such situation would be avoiding marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation / common law marriage contract).SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
All you would need in such situation would be avoiding marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation / common law marriage contract).
Then they’ll making having sex a reason to come after your goods and services. One f~~~ and lose your house. Two f~~~s and lose a year salary and lifetime alimony for 3 or more f~~~s.
Women have to monetize that gash.
That’s the real purpose of sex laws.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
All you would need in such situation would be avoiding marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation / common law marriage contract).
Then they’ll making having sex a reason to come after your goods and services. One f~~~ and lose your house. Two f~~~s and lose a year salary and lifetime alimony for 3 or more f~~~s.
Women have to monetize that gash.
That’s the real purpose of sex laws.
I know.
But you know, everything keep flowing, everything change…
fleshlights, robot vacuum cleanears, robotic kitchens, sex robots, artificial wombs…SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Anonymous14Very well written, and I agree with all of it. Women have not and will not be transcending their nature in the near future. We are basically livestock to be pitted against one another to see who the winner is that will be getting the right to breed in their eyes. Hence their lovely Alpha and Beta terms for us that they throw around openly without shame. It has even become common practice to shame males with s~~~ like “that is so Beta”, have had it used towards me after a very intelligent insight on Youtube that got up voted nearly 200 times, but still, some bitch had to come in and say that because I was examining reality instead of playing the game she wanted to condition me to play…
Men are more capable of transcending their animal nature, not all men, just some, women seem nearly completely incapable of it. A look at all the top intellectuals and scientists is all the evidence that I need to cite here. In short, women don’t spend much time thinking and analyzing, men do.
Anonymous1Spot on analysis. I think your theory is correct.
I started thinking about this years ago, after reading a book on Charles Manson. Charlie gets tons of fan mail from teenage girls, love letters and such. I looked into this further and found that its pretty much all serial killers from the “Nightstalker” to the “Ice Man” that get fan mail from women. Thats when I started to read about Hybristophilia.
It seems like Hybristophilia is a fundamental part of female nature. They just can’t help it. For all of the above reasons you pointed out.
Highly plausible.
Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678