A modest proposal for welfare reform

Topic by Rumpole

Rumpole

Home Forums Political Corner A modest proposal for welfare reform

This topic contains 8 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Sky-O  Sky-O 3 years ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #390182
    +4
    Rumpole
    Rumpole
    Participant
    994

    Levels of out-of-wedlock births have skyrocketed over the past few decades. What used to be considered shameful is now acceptable in our deviant society. Levels run from around 30 percent of births in the white population to over 70 percent among blacks. The financial and social implications of this behavior are enormous and wide ranging.
    To discourage this, I offer the following proposals:
    1. Pass a bill prohibiting any welfare payments for future out-of-wedlock births.
    2. This would apply to any children born one year after the bill is signed into law.
    3. The only exception would be for children of women who were widowed after the child’s conception.

    #390235
    +3
    Oz-Bloke
    Oz-Bloke
    Participant
    3233

    Feminazis would never allow it as it is counter to the welfare and legal system-backed Vagina Monetization Scam (VMS) they have engineered over decades. Any moves that could tarnish the power and ‘rights’ of the Golden Uterus would be vehemently opposed by half the population – because VAGINA. What do you mean ‘You want me to be financially responsible for my 8+ kids?’ –
    .
    14 kids mother 1
    .
    14 kids mother 2
    .
    jobless mother of 11
    .
    syrian muslim refugee four wives
    .
    afghan muslim refugee nine kids
    .
    uk single mother of eight kids
    .
    family 17 kids
    .
    self confessed welfare queen
    .
    At the end of the day marriage is just a piece of paper that has had its time in the sun. I personally believe that to begin curtailing overpopulation and the Vagina Monetization Scam we must limit welfare and family tax breaks to a maximum ceiling rate of one child per mother. Take away the financial / lifestyle incentive for mindless breeding. From my experience most single mothers choose the lifestyle to avoid the workforce out of sheer laziness. Time to cap that welfare s~~~ before we throw the baby out with the bathwater!

    #ManOut

    #390378
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    what we need is drastic population reduction.
    mandatory sterilization of every woman after the first child is born.
    dead motherf~~~ing serious.

    #390508
    WhackerGuy2030
    WhackerGuy2030
    Participant
    999

    A simple solution to head off the single teen mom carnage on society would be to eliminate the marriage penalty in welfare. A married couple with four kids vs a single mom with two kids and half the income will get way more welfare than the married couple. So the economics of it demand the father be kept away. Smart parents will do a paper divorce and split the kids on paper as well. Way more money to be had.
    .
    A more radical approach would be to implement a cut in welfare 12 months out. For any child born after 2017, you get benefits for one kid and that’s it. You get knocked up after that, you had better get your hooks in Chad because the taxpayers ain’t paying the operating costs of your semen landfill (I just came up with that) anymore.

    #390579
    +1
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    Better yet just mandate birth control.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #390587
    Xenon
    xenon
    Participant
    2007

    Those pictures are absolutely scary. I am not leaving my house today or maybe tomorrow too. WTF?

    After divorce number two, I luckily have everything paid off….again…and my way of dealing with “taxes for babies having babies” is to only work enough to support myself minimizing my tax burden. The taxes I would have gladly paid over the rest of my life will be directly translated into time for me and whatever it is I decide to do with it. So far there is nothing to be done about being forced to pay to educate their spawn short of not owning or renting property and living in the forest. A very good option that may be exercised in the end.

    The only sane way to look at school tax for a guy like me is to open your damn eyes and see that your tax dollars go to help “educate” children that were spawned by chad with women that gladly left you alone night after night while riding chad after chad. Kind of makes that permanent camping expedition seem pretty good doesn’t it?

    #390590
    Cataphract
    Cataphract
    Participant
    2656

    Better yet just mandate birth control.

    Mandatory IUDs for women over 16 and only removed once they are married for at least a year.

    Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

    #390601
    Gnostic
    Gnostic
    Participant
    2491

    More government is not the answer. Government will find a way to scam more money out of it.

    Kick government out of welfare donation and use private donation instead. The rest of the things will sort out themselves.

    Forced donation by government is just robbery.

    There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

    #391801
    Sky-O
    Sky-O
    Participant
    18934

    Reform all welfare.

    Including free public education at a cost of $14,000 per kid, per year for K-12 education (that’s $160,000 per kid for twelve years).

    ‘Bailouts’ for corporations. As well as subsidies for them.

    Government & State pensions.
    (they don’t reflect reality and are in fact, welfare)

    Massive tax deductions that are just welfare for the wealthy and in most cases only about 3-4% of taxpayers can legally use them.

    &

    The Federal Reserve. Because when money that DOES NOT exist, is created out of thin air and winds up ‘stimulating’ the economy and making the rich even richer. Well, that IS also a form of welfare. But for the wealthy. And it is the most insidious and vile form, since it simultaneously reduces the purchasing power of those that have little or no wealth.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.