A measure of truth breaking through?

Topic by 743 roadmaster

743 roadmaster

Home Forums Political Corner A measure of truth breaking through?

This topic contains 11 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by Handsome Vic  Handsome Vic 2 years ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #715923
    +5
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    Trump’s Immigration Remarks Outrage Many, but Others Quietly Agree

    The Czech president has called Muslim immigrants criminals. The head of Poland’s governing party has said refugees are riddled with disease. The leader of Hungary has described migrants as a poison.

    This week, Austria’s new far-right interior minister suggested “concentrating” migrants in asylum centers — with all its obvious and odious echoes of World War II.

    ———What makes this captain obvious statement of value here is it is being said at the New York Times, the bastion of liberal leftist nutjobs.

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    #715938
    +2
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    While on the topic of truth, just love Lucas

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    #715968
    +5
    Silver Fox
    Silver Fox
    Participant
    2766

    If these countries weren’t s~~~holes, then why do the dems always screech loudly about how we need to increase foreign aid to these countries?

    "Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

    #715984
    +5
    SH3LLZ
    SH3LLZ
    Participant
    5569

    Wow.. Thats powerful. What people dont take into consideration is that many of the young migrants are all coming from war torn countries. While they may not have engaged in terrorist activities then, they were still bombarded with anti west imagery and propaganda. You are basically letting in an angry mob of people who are all suffering from PTSD since they were children. And Its not lost on them when they KNOW whos been dropping bombs on their countries for decades. Then you move an entire civilization into your backyard who generally hates you. Its just backwards.

    #ICETHEMOUT
    #MANOUT

    #ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

    #715996
    +2
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    Silver Fox is right on point—but we should CUT all aid to these countries—completely.

    #716007
    +1
    Silver Fox
    Silver Fox
    Participant
    2766

    Silver Fox is right on point—but we should CUT all aid to these countries—completely.

    Agreed!

    I don’t think foreign aid to third-world countries has led to a single, documented case where the country has become on par with first-world countries because of foreign aid.

    Not to say that we shouldn’t help suffering people. We should. But leave that up to private organizations and individuals. It should never be the province of governments through tax dollars.

    "Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

    #716008
    +3
    It'sallbs
    It’sallbs
    Participant

    If these countries weren’t s~~~holes, then why do the dems always screech loudly about how we need to increase foreign aid to these countries?

    Because it is all about regime change and installing puppet leaders controlled by America.

    The project for the new American centre planned it all in writing with the invasion of 7 countries -now you don’t need to read the document to work out which 7 countries those are.

    America want’s to control the entire world that is why Eisenhower threatened the UK with economic destruction over Egypt and the Suez Crisis, eh saw it as us rebuilding our empire.

    Germany has it’s empire = EU

    America would invade Britain (as it planned to in the 1930s)if it wasn’t strategically useful to have your fighter planes here.

    http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

    #716057
    +3
    Silver Fox
    Silver Fox
    Participant
    2766

    If these countries weren’t s~~~holes, then why do the dems always screech loudly about how we need to increase foreign aid to these countries?

    Because it is all about regime change and installing puppet leaders controlled by America.

    The project for the new American centre planned it all in writing with the invasion of 7 countries -now you don’t need to read the document to work out which 7 countries those are.

    America want’s to control the entire world that is why Eisenhower threatened the UK with economic destruction over Egypt and the Suez Crisis, eh saw it as us rebuilding our empire.

    Germany has it’s empire = EU

    America would invade Britain (as it planned to in the 1930s)if it wasn’t strategically useful to have your fighter planes here.

    Yeah, and it’s been interesting to see the plan get disrupted in the last few years by Russia… the American shadow government thought Syria was in the bag, until Putin stepped in and destroyed ISIS. They didn’t anticipate that monkey wrench thrown into the gears!

    Same thing with Ukraine. They thought they had a sure deal, to get a new pro-NATO government into place and then they would have NATO country right on the border with Russia… until the civil war reduced Ukraine into shambles.

    "Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

    #716068
    +2
    It'sallbs
    It’sallbs
    Participant

    Putin plays a very smart game in my opinion.

    Never been to Russia, must go one day.

    http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

    #716139
    +1

    Anonymous
    14

    The project for the new American centre planned it all in writing with the invasion of 7 countries -now you don’t need to read the document to work out which 7 countries those are.

    Here is some measure of truth breaking through-

    Great points made by SH3LLZ, it is almost as if the intent is to create more chaos throughout the West, with Israel being exempt from baring any of the refugee burden. The insidious irony of course being that all these wars that are being waged with U.S. Tax dollars are vs. those that Israel want’s taken out, Iran and it’s allies. Hey Pete, shouldn’t we stop paying for that s~~~ as well? Nah, what am I saying, I know you are a Right Winger who wants to use other people’s money for special interests, just like Leftists. So, as long as it is your interests being served you keep your mouth shut.

    And people still don’t get these wars are in part the wars of Globalists as the refugees are being shuttled into the E.U. This was made in 07′ well before Libya and Gaddafi’s warning that Europe would turn black if he were taken out. It always makes me shake my head when people only call out half of the problem, the letting in of refugees, yet never step back and call out what created them and allowed them to move north in the first place. Pretty f~~~ing retarded.

    (9/11 inside job and Libya destruction/destabilization being the main pieces of the puzzle)

    #716192
    +1

    Anonymous
    3

    “S~~~hole countries”
    Yes, there are plenty of really bad places on this planet. And one has to admit, that letting a country-ful of refuges in does not solve anything. The only possible solution is to somehow make them stop the wars and help them solve the problems locally. I mean their way of thinking needs to be changed.

    I mean, some people of those countries will also agree that it is a s~~~hole, but they cannot help it, and run away to have a non-s~~~ life. But Europe just cannot handle millions. The whole system of laws is not desingned for whole countries of refugees. Not to mention there are terrorists, people of trauma and PTSD, criminals, and whatever problems among them.

    And, s~~~, I also tend to feel that “s~~~hole” about my country, when I arrive back from abroad, and when I see the rusty s~~~ty train station next to the main airport, and taking the dirty rusty slow train to hometown. (Just saying, here the toilet on the train just ends in a big pipe, that makes s~~~ and pee fall in between the rails. And no one ever cleans it up except nature. That dirty… And this is already in Europe.)

    #716338
    +1
    Handsome Vic
    Handsome Vic
    Participant
    1613

    I’ve been on this Earth a few decades. I have travelled in the West, the East, the first world countries and the s~~~hole countries.

    I see the “West” as we knew it in decline. Too much debt (government and consumer), too much unskilled immigration, too much feminism which destroyed the traditional family, enlarged the labour pool and drove down wages. Too much costly war. Services in decline on one hand, and encouraging chronic poverty (daddy government) on the other. Impossibly costly health care. Inflation. If the affluent countries are more indebted than ever — after a 10-year post-recession “boom” — and more indebted each day — when will they ever recover? It’s unsustainable.

    In the east I see a LOT of growth. But it is a mirage. It is fuelled by government debt. Even oil-rich easy-money Saudi Arabia can’t maintain its status quo of social services to the working population unless oil recovers to around $100/bbl. The Eastern growth comes with even greater polarization of wealth — It’s not as though entire countries are being lifted out of poverty as one to what we would consider a middle-class Western standard of living. Some people are becoming more affluent. The working majority remain very poor.

    Ever see the movie “Elysium”? That’s the direction I fear things are headed. The most extremely wealthy people who can afford the technology keep themselves isolated from (and exploit) massive populations of poor who scrape to get by (ie everyone else). Globalization, technology and financialization are great levellers. It could take one major war or economic crisis to push our society past the point of no return.

    I think the West is going to have to face up to politically incorrect choices in the years ahead, or face continued decline. It may already be too late.

    I'm going my own way. Maybe I'll see you there.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.