Home › Forums › The Litter Box › A General Attitude Towards Women P1
This topic contains 26 replies, has 24 voices, and was last updated by Cap285 4 years, 5 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Call me a radical feminist but I find women great, amazing. They are amazing for… women. They are just different. No, not different the way you think. They are a different species with different mental processes, different behavior and different goals. Again, they are neither worse nor better – just different. Like dogs or skunks or else. In no way do I think that women are comparable to dogs. Dogs are quadruped, what is not the case with women (well, except when they are drunk or being doggy-styled). Dogs bark…., women, hmm, well women also do. BUT: dogs are loyal and true till the end no matter if you are poor, depressed or else. So, you see, women significantly differ in certain relationships from dogs and other species.
So we, the enlightened products of Hollywood movies where women are strong and smart and men weak, neurotic and stupid and a society where the submissive and horny women-defender is the standard for a “good” male, completely disagree with what Orpheus, the proto-father of Greek philosophy said some 3500 years ago: “There is nothing more doggish and detestable than women.” It would be absurd and idiotic to interpret my thought as women-hating. I have a spouse who I appreciate like all other beings on this planet. Do you hate an ant when it bites you, a dog when it barks at you or a mule when it kicks you? Do you say to a cobra: “O, you are so mean, I’m so disappointed”? Of course not. This is the nature of the being, and it cannot do otherwise. It is your fault that you don’t understand this fact and produce false expectations, that you are dependent. By the way, the German word for “disappoint” is “ent-täuschen” which means “stop being deceived”. When you are disappointed this is the end of deception.
In order to have a better understanding look at the ancestors. The ancestors of a man are the priests of Egypt and Sumer, Orpheus, the authors of the Bhagavat Gita, the Chinese philosophers, Thales, Democritus, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zenon, Chrysippus, Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius…. Yes, we are heirs of godlike men. As for women, they are the heirs of…. well, women. Or can you name me a female pendant of Socrates, of Siddhartha Gautama, of Confucius? Again: this does not mean that women are worse, just that they are different. The problem with not understanding this is the reason for the attachment 99% of heterosexual men feel for women. But one can evaluate an issue in an objective manner only if one has at least some distance thereto. So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”. And imagine how would you react if a different species (for ex a panda) did it. You don’t show a surge of e(vil)-motions, caprices, weakness. On the contrary – you show mild affection, you show that you are in control, that you are strong, disciplined and just. You curb your expectations and know that the other being might behave in a strange and illogical way.
Feel free to post an intro, the menbers here are (justifiably) wary of newcomers. A variety of this concept is played in “Speaker for the Dead” by Orson Scot Card. The males are humanoids pig-like creatures and the females are trees. I can also see a reference to the Faded Sun trilogy by C.J. Cherryh. One race refers to all other races as not them. I believe it’s also the concept of Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus to use a non-Sci Fi book. In the whole I understand what you’re saying, but what do you propose? Theory and understanding is great, but the World revolves around application.
I’m not going to speak for anybody else here. Knowing that I’m smarter, faster, stronger and deficient in all three to no woman that I’ve ever met didn’t prevent me from making a series of mistakes. I don’t hang out with Cobras, or Koalas, or Polar Bears; that’s exactly what the majority here do. The animals are better left to the zoo keepers that want to deal with their daily feeding and crap.
I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.
Call me a radical feminist but I find women great, amazing. They are amazing for… women. They are just different. No, not different the way you think. They are a different species with different mental processes, different behavior and different goals. Again, they are neither worse nor better – just different. Like dogs or skunks or else. In no way do I think that women are comparable to dogs. Dogs are quadruped, what is not the case with women (well, except when they are drunk or being doggy-styled). Dogs bark…., women, hmm, well women also do. BUT: dogs are loyal and true till the end no matter if you are poor, depressed or else. So, you see, women significantly differ in certain relationships from dogs and other species.
So we, the enlightened products of Hollywood movies where women are strong and smart and men weak, neurotic and stupid and a society where the submissive and horny women-defender is the standard for a “good” male, completely disagree with what Orpheus, the proto-father of Greek philosophy said some 3500 years ago: “There is nothing more doggish and detestable than women.” It would be absurd and idiotic to interpret my thought as women-hating. I have a spouse who I appreciate like all other beings on this planet. Do you hate an ant when it bites you, a dog when it barks at you or a mule when it kicks you? Do you say to a cobra: “O, you are so mean, I’m so disappointed”? Of course not. This is the nature of the being, and it cannot do otherwise. It is your fault that you don’t understand this fact and produce false expectations, that you are dependent. By the way, the German word for “disappoint” is “ent-täuschen” which means “stop being deceived”. When you are disappointed this is the end of deception.
In order to have a better understanding look at the ancestors. The ancestors of a man are the priests of Egypt and Sumer, Orpheus, the authors of the Bhagavat Gita, the Chinese philosophers, Thales, Democritus, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zenon, Chrysippus, Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius…. Yes, we are heirs of godlike men. As for women, they are the heirs of…. well, women. Or can you name me a female pendant of Socrates, of Siddhartha Gautama, of Confucius? Again: this does not mean that women are worse, just that they are different. The problem with not understanding this is the reason for the attachment 99% of heterosexual men feel for women. But one can evaluate an issue in an objective manner only if one has at least some distance thereto. So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”. And imagine how would you react if a different species (for ex a panda) did it. You don’t show a surge of e(vil)-motions, caprices, weakness. On the contrary – you show mild affection, you show that you are in control, that you are strong, disciplined and just. You curb your expectations and know that the other being might behave in a strange and illogical way.You f~~~ing Mangina! F~~~ off…
…Do you hate an ant when it bites you, a dog when it barks at you or a mule when it kicks you?…
No, I do not, What I do do is make sure that the circumstances which led to that event (in these analogies p~~~ing off the animals in question) are never allowed to reoccur and therefore I do not have to suffer the negative consequence again.
This is the nature of the being, and it cannot do otherwise
Congratulations, you just made our point for us. Women have their nature, and they cannot do otherwise, so we take the necessary actions to ensure we do not suffer the consequences of that nature, we go our own way.
Anonymous11So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”.
You’re not telling us anything we don’t already know so maybe you should have spent some more time reading threads. You are right about not saying she did this or that and getting angry. It’s the way they are programmed. We choose to accept it as-is and deal with it in the red pill manner.
Some of the Brothers here are fresh out of disastrous relations~~~s with one of these vapid creatures. Anger is a normal and healthy reaction for them at that stage. The anger eventually develops into a cold sterile detachment once one realizes the truth.
I refuse to worship before the all powerful vagina. I fully expect to be castigated by women and their servile manginas for my personal choice. Hold on let me check into something…..No, I still have zero f~~~s to give.
I got attacked by a bear once in the Sierras. Good thing I was quicker than it was and I got away with my jacket in tatters and a broke rib. Do you think I’m gonna go ahead and try to pet a wild bear after that?
Now you replace bear with woman and you then know my position as MGTOW.
And they’re NOT different creatures, they are still human beings and there is NO excuse for them behaving as they do.Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!Go to the archives read get educated and post an intro. You are saying nothing completely new to anyone. Don’t just go to a forum and start talking. This isn’t reddit or tumblr.
I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.
Well, here’s what feminists think about you:
from Julie Bindel, one of the most influential feminist scholars, published today and no, she’s not kidding:
will heterosexuality survive women’s liberation?
It won’t, not unless men get their act together, have their power taken from them and behave themselves. I mean, I would actually put them all in some kind of camp where they can all drive around in quad bikes, or bicycles, or white vans. I would give them a choice of vehicles to drive around with, give them no porn, they wouldn’t be able to fight – we would have wardens, of course! Women who want to see their sons or male loved ones would be able to go and visit, or take them out like a library book, and then bring them back.
I hope heterosexuality doesn’t survive, actually. I would like to see a truce on heterosexuality. I would like an amnesty on heterosexuality until we have sorted ourselves out. Because under patriarchy it’s s~~~.
And I am sick of hearing from individual women that their men are all right. Those men have been shored up by the advantages of patriarchy and they are complacent, they are not stopping other men from being s~~~.
I would love to see a women’s liberation that results in women turning away from men and saying: “when you come back as human beings, then we might look again.”
http://www.radfemcollective.org/news/2015/8/29/an-interview-with-julie-bindel
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
No, I still have zero f~~~s to give.
You f~~~ing Mangina! F~~~ off…
says it all for me, out the door you go….
go spew your bulls~~~ elsewhere
I see a c~~~ punt coming………
Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus
That book passed through my hands when I was still in my blue pill stage. My reaction was: Holy crap! Men really are different from women! A bit of pondering produced its corollary: The feminists have been lying to me all along!
Further reflection finds me concluding that the feminists have been lying to themselves and all of us. All of us all along.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
Anonymous29Call me a radical feminist – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -yaaaaaawn – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – yaaaaaawn – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – — – – – – — – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -yaaaaaawn – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – in a strange and illogical way.
I can imagine this clown writing this, with gusto and a self satisfied smile on their face thinking they have enlightened us with their wordery.
F~~~ off blue piller.
Anonymous11Are we going to be treated to P2? I can hardly wait.
T~~~ or mangina. I’m flipping a coin on that one.
Anonymous1OP smells of a giant pile of
BS…CowS~~~…(as we know, BS can only come from a Bull…)
In no way do I think that women are comparable to dogs.
I don’t either. Put your woman and your dog in the trunk of your car for a couple of hours.
When you come back… which one will be happy to see you?????Call me a radical feminist
Why bother? When we can just toss you in the litter box. Radical feminists are not welcome here. Or anywhere for that matter.
What do you mean by: A General Attitude Towards Women PART ONE??
There will not be a part 2.
MGTOW treat women according to her OWN individual behavior. Openly declaring “They [women] are not worse or better – just different” is like saying “I breathe air”. Now, maybe you feel some need to post a lecture in multiple parts on trying to influence others on “the general attitude towards women” in multiple volumes….. but that’s silly, unrealistic and impossible. You can’t afford to be that naive. No man can.
You don’t hold women to your OWN ideals.
You hold her to HER own ideals.In doing so, your “general attitude towards women” is not even a variable anymore.
You remove yourself (and your attitude) from the equation and treat her according to her OWN actions and behavior.Nobody gets to have a problem with that.
•••••••
Furthermore, you’re not going to learn anything if you ignore generalizations. So let’s say your “general attitude towards woman” is a GOOD one. That’s highly precarious – especially when you consider the general female attitude towards men is NOT a good one.
Women simply don’t give men the benefit of the doubt. That’s why they say things like “how do I know I can trust you?” or “how do I know you’re not going to hurt me?”. That is a generally BAD attitude towards men. We accept that and understand that “general attitude towards men” is BAD – even though she already knows that most men she passes in her every day life will NOT hurt her. She just met him, and a man already knows she’s not going to treat him according to HIS own behavior and actions … she will treat him according to her “general attitude towards men”. No matter how far from the truth it is.
Based on that alone, you don’t get to tell anyone about what kind of “general attitude towards women” they should have.
Treating women according to their own actions and behavior is a FAR more generous courtesy than what they will extend to YOU. Of that you can be 100% certain. And you can prove it with your own social experiment. Tell a woman who says “I want a man who knows how to treat a woman” that you know EXACTLY how to treat a woman: According to her OWN actions and behavior . She will have a problem with that. And why? Because she wants you to treat her like an angel, even when she behaves like a complete bitch.
She doesn’t WANT to be treated according to her own actions and behavior.
She would prefer to be treated according to some FALSE POSITIVE “general attitude towards women”.You will never hear a woman say “I prefer to be treated according to my own actions and behavior”.
But you can hear millions of them say “I want a man who knows how to treat a woman”.Fascinating, isn’t it.
Here’s the “general attitude towards men” »»
And YOU sign up here to lecture MEN on the “general attitude towards women are wonderful PART ONE”???What do you think we’re stupid too? lol go f~~~ yourself.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Call me a radical feminist but I find women great, amazing. They are amazing for… women. They are just different. No, not different the way you think. They are a different species with different mental processes, different behavior and different goals. Again, they are neither worse nor better – just different. Like dogs or skunks or else. In no way do I think that women are comparable to dogs. Dogs are quadruped, what is not the case with women (well, except when they are drunk or being doggy-styled). Dogs bark…., women, hmm, well women also do. BUT: dogs are loyal and true till the end no matter if you are poor, depressed or else. So, you see, women significantly differ in certain relationships from dogs and other species.
So we, the enlightened products of Hollywood movies where women are strong and smart and men weak, neurotic and stupid and a society where the submissive and horny women-defender is the standard for a “good” male, completely disagree with what Orpheus, the proto-father of Greek philosophy said some 3500 years ago: “There is nothing more doggish and detestable than women.” It would be absurd and idiotic to interpret my thought as women-hating. I have a spouse who I appreciate like all other beings on this planet. Do you hate an ant when it bites you, a dog when it barks at you or a mule when it kicks you? Do you say to a cobra: “O, you are so mean, I’m so disappointed”? Of course not. This is the nature of the being, and it cannot do otherwise. It is your fault that you don’t understand this fact and produce false expectations, that you are dependent. By the way, the German word for “disappoint” is “ent-täuschen” which means “stop being deceived”. When you are disappointed this is the end of deception.
In order to have a better understanding look at the ancestors. The ancestors of a man are the priests of Egypt and Sumer, Orpheus, the authors of the Bhagavat Gita, the Chinese philosophers, Thales, Democritus, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zenon, Chrysippus, Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius…. Yes, we are heirs of godlike men. As for women, they are the heirs of…. well, women. Or can you name me a female pendant of Socrates, of Siddhartha Gautama, of Confucius? Again: this does not mean that women are worse, just that they are different. The problem with not understanding this is the reason for the attachment 99% of heterosexual men feel for women. But one can evaluate an issue in an objective manner only if one has at least some distance thereto. So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”. And imagine how would you react if a different species (for ex a panda) did it. You don’t show a surge of e(vil)-motions, caprices, weakness. On the contrary – you show mild affection, you show that you are in control, that you are strong, disciplined and just. You curb your expectations and know that the other being might behave in a strange and illogical way.Dam I nearly missed the lecture
Cool story babe now go make me a sandwich
What exactly did you hope to achieve by this post T. Stoy?
are you a chia pet in man drag Wow…… what a clown, clown of epic proportions.
I mean, the whole post is a mess, but this line made me smile the most.So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”.
Oh yes, Sweden – It’s a wonder
peoplebiological machines are not walking around in creepy masks, to look truly equal and generic… equally f~~~ed up that is.
Like in Bioshock.Also, calling a human, an IT, …. where did I see that before ? Aaah yes…glorious.
Seems like it’s completely normal by today’s standards, wasn’t that maniac objectifying his victims or something, dehumanizing them?Well done m8. Gr8 b8 8 out of 8 POTY Good troll post, not gonna bother quoting every line, it’s ridiculous but not worth it.
-----------
They are amazing for… women. They are just different. No, not different the way you think. They are a different species with different mental processes, different behavior and different goals. Again, they are neither worse nor better – just different.
They are not a different species.
They are human beings just like the rest of us.Now get your worthless simp ass off of this forum!
Sorry OP, so sorry, will have to agree with Tau on this one.
They are human beings
Yeh, I agree, last time I checked anatomy, biology books and googled it up. Unless it’s a conspiracy and they are space Lizards ..or worse.
-----------
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678