A Curiosity with the Apperence of the "chad" preoccupation

[ExecrationParticipant 1496]

When it comes to getting laid I feel Some men are Competitive.

Chad is anyone who gets laid frequently, if I’m not mistaken or happens to naturally get laid.

Taking notice of how the MGTOW philosophy and NFG attitude has a tendency to get men laid, more frequently than being Blue-pill , from what I can tell the only discerntment between a man GHOW and Chad is being or choosing to be sexually active.

Do we approach being more like chad as a MGHOW and face the reprecussions of the beta by rejecting a Women sexually i.e the shaming tactics.

[bladeParticipant]

I got the chad look and i notice it . Shaved head and beard . Lol .

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Execration wrote:

When it comes to getting laid I feel some men are Competitive.

Ya think? Too many men will throw their own brother under the bus.

Execration wrote:

Chad is anyone who gets laid frequently, if I’m not mistaken or happens to naturally get laid.

Chad is to the SMP what rich kids are to the regular economy. You cant really understand SMP-dynamics without knowing Chad. Often totally oblivious and purposely condescending or cruel to his fellow man, Chad has absolutely no clue about why whatever he does works.

Chad Thunderc~~~ is the subject of your study – and nothing more. Do not confuse him with the “alpha”. He is simply the embodiment of the phrase “No matter how good you are, theres always somebody better”. And “better” depends on circumstance – not facts or reason.

Chad isn’t REALLY your “competition” and is very often a step down. The reality of the threat & competition Chad represents is the fault of widespread female promiscuity. Her decision to spread for Chad (instead of you) has little or nothing to do with you.

Execration wrote:

Taking notice of how the MGTOW/NFG attitude has a tendency to get men laid, more frequently than being Blue-pill

Notice how you said “get laid” and “get men laid” 4 times.
That’s treating sex like the prize or reward for men.

MGTOW/NFG is the other way around and it only works if it’s genuine. You can’t fake NFG to try and get the bang. They should stick to “game” instead of pretending not to want it. You need to be able to throw a hot, horny & naked chick out of your place and be perfectly OK with it and mean it.

When you KNOW that women are hornier than you, the script starts to flip and now SHE’s the one “trying to get laid”, because you truly have no f~~~s to give.

Execration wrote:

Do we approach being more like chad as a MGHOW and face the reprecussions of the beta by rejecting a Women sexually i.e the shaming tactics.

This started as a question and then became unclear.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[ExecrationParticipant 1496]

Keymaster wrote:

Execration wrote:

When it comes to getting laid I feel some men are Competitive.

Ya think? Too many men will throw their own brother under the bus.

Execration wrote:

Chad is anyone who gets laid frequently, if I’m not mistaken or happens to naturally get laid.

Chad is to the SMP what rich kids are to the regular economy. You cant really understand SMP-dynamics without knowing Chad. Often totally oblivious and purposely condescending or cruel to his fellow man, Chad has absolutely no clue about why whatever he does works.

Chad Thunderc~~~ is the subject of your study – and nothing more. Do not confuse him with the “alpha”. He is simply the embodiment of the phrase “No matter how good you are, theres always somebody better”. And “better” depends on circumstance – not facts or reason.

Chad isn’t REALLY your “competition” and is very often a step down. The reality of the threat & competition Chad represents is the fault of widespread female promiscuity. Her decision to spread for Chad (instead of you) has little or nothing to do with you.

Execration wrote:

Taking notice of how the MGTOW/NFG attitude has a tendency to get men laid, more frequently than being Blue-pill

Notice how you said “get laid” and “get men laid” 4 times.
That’s treating sex like the prize or reward for men.

MGTOW/NFG is the other way around and it only works if it’s genuine. You can’t fake NFG to try and get the bang. They should stick to “game” instead of pretending not to want it. You need to be able to throw a hot, horny & naked chick out of your place and be perfectly OK with it and mean it.

When you KNOW that women are hornier than you, the script starts to flip and now SHE’s the one “trying to get laid”, because you truly have no f~~~s to give.

Execration wrote:

Do we approach being more like chad as a MGHOW and face the reprecussions of the beta by rejecting a Women sexually i.e the shaming tactics.

This started as a question and then became unclear.

Good Points KM, I also appreciate the Information.

what I was trying to question is if “Chad” is even real by considering mating potential based on Female mating preference. I also was Considering whether female Preference has anything to do with what a majority beilieves it does as Chad is Considered a man of Status,(socially because he gets laid)despite having none .

From my understanding Chad is apparently regarded as being a Socially Dominant Male (what gets him laid) however, considering In Social hierarchies Status Determines Social Dominance, or the Inverse and status is dependent on wealth I’m Confused.

Considering the Inverse that Social Dominance determines wealth, based on Chads existence it Conflicts with what defines a beta-Provider.From my understanding by all means a beta-provider should beconsidered the socially Dominant male based on Status alone.

I do realise Women are Hornier , except Chad apparently has more Priveledge for X,Y, and Z reasons.

Also, Studies Suggest Beta-males are not a mating-preference. I just Don’t understand.

[ExecrationParticipant 1496]

blade wrote:

I got the chad look and i notice it . Shaved head and beard . Lol .

Whats up blade!

I Didn’t know you had a shaved head-Sometimes you have to be a badass.Been awhile since I talked with you man.Hope all is well

[AwakenedParticipant 35200]

If you’re focused on going your own way, why do you Give a F~~~ about Chad and/ or his HO’s ??

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

Chad is whoever taps into her ancient animal psyche, and give her the thrill that tingles her vag. 2017 woman wants the beta provider, but 150,000 BC woman wants Chad.

Almost every woman I have known, whether lover or platonic, admits that during sex they love it when a guy gets completely dominant and rough…and that’s who “Chad” is…literally and figuratively.

Sovereignty above all else.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Caution about using sex as a metric for success.
To get sex you have to first be desired by woman. This need for desire puts you in a corner that can lead to a viscous circle in either direction.
In one direction you become an arrogant ass because you think your better than guys who cant get laid, or the other direction you become depressed because guys are screwing woman you can’t get. Regardless you have given woman power over you they should not have. Being a Chad is as pathetic as being a bluepill. They both suffer from the same issue – letting woman have the final say in their self-worth.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

Chad is more of a running joke around here than something to aspire to.

Chad is the guy that breaks up relationships. Chad is the guy that helps them become single moms. Chad is the guy that gives them tingles. Chad is the guy that REALLY only wants one thing. He ruins their lives by making them cheaters, and he ruins his by giving value to the V.

Chad is a loser, he is just successful by his measure of life. Chad can be an unemployed slacker, or a passionate artist, or a felon. I could be Chad, but I have too much respect for myself.

Chad views the World through glasses crafted by women. He gets mentioned here so often because he’s such an quandary. He thinks he’s winning while he’s bobbing for apples in a kiddie pool full of s~~~.

Chad isn’t an obsession here. He’s a standard punchline because women operate on such basic programming.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[OneTrueMisfitSpectator 2690]

FrostByte wrote:

Caution about using sex as a metric for success.
To get sex you have to first be desired by woman. This need for desire puts you in a corner that can lead to a viscous circle in either direction.
In one direction you become an arrogant ass because you think your better than guys who cant get laid, or the other direction you become depressed because guys are screwing woman you can’t get. Regardless you have given woman power over you they should not have. Being a Chad is as pathetic as being a bluepill. They both suffer from the same issue – letting woman have the final say in their self-worth.

Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Winner winner chicken dinner. Slaves to the pussy.

Don't care

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

Keymaster wrote:

Chad isn’t REALLY your “competition” and is very often a step down. The reality of the threat & competition Chad represents is the fault of widespread female promiscuity. Her decision to spread for Chad (instead of you) has little or nothing to do with you.

KM has yet again nailed it! I can’t tell you how many times girls have left me for a CHAD who was in every metric worse than me: looks, income, and goals.

I have noticed how women will often go back to Ex-Chad when they get the resurgence of the gina tingles. I’ve even recently had a girl who attempted to rekindle feelings with me after going back to Ex-Chad. I had to give her the chair. I ghosted her, and have no desire to even be friends. She ended that possibility with her petulant behavior.

I want a women, not a girl…

Women and their promiscuity have reached a new level of absurdity. Dating today is nothing more than a s~~~ show. A veritable circus.

I hate circuses…

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

The irony here is that all of the negative things that a Chad causes was once reviled by society, now it is not only accepted it is seen as the new normal to some.

Where is that damned meteor…

Sovereignty above all else.

[Sky-OParticipant 18933]

Anyone can look like a Chad with the right tattoos, clothes and rough ‘masculine’ aesthetics.

But today’s Chad is inevitably tomorrows insignificant loser in the eyes of women.

Pumpkin only knows what she wants right now. Bases her subjective assessment of what kind of c~~~ she wants on a combination of ingrained evolutionary biological signals, contemporary societal influences and the usual tingles.

Chads have expiration dates and when pumpkin is done with them, they are as relevant as road kill.

And I’ve known a few Chads. Underneath it all, they are an extremely fragile bunch. In most cases, they don’t even know who they are.

And at the end of the day, they are pawns of pumpkin just like beta and just as disposable when the time comes for pumpkin to devalue & discard them.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Execration wrote:

Chad is anyone who gets laid frequently, if I’m not mistaken or happens to naturally get laid.

Nah. Chad is a lesson on female behavior, and has nothing to do with male behavior, not even the behavior of Chad.

Keymaster wrote:

Chad has absolutely no clue about why whatever he does works.

Exactly. And when things stop “working” for Chad he generally becomes just another pussy begging simp.

Execration wrote:

From my understanding Chad is apparently regarded as being a Socially Dominant Male (what gets him laid) however, considering In Social hierarchies Status Determines Social Dominance, or the Inverse and status is dependent on wealth I’m Confused.

Nope. Social dominance has nothing to do with it.

Sky-O wrote:

Anyone can look like a Chad with the right tattoos, clothes and rough ‘masculine’ aesthetics.

Nor do any outward physical traits. “Looking like Chad” does not make one a Chad. I know a few out of shape, overweight Chads.

What makes a Chad has almost nothing to do with the Chad himself, and very little to do with a woman’s perception of him, but has a lot to do with women’s perception of other women’s perception of him.

tl;dr: Women want Chad because they think other women want Chad. This has almost nothing to do with Chad himself.

[Author]

Posts