9/11 .Truth.

I have seen slow-mo vids of the towers and the explosions happened on different floors, the first ones completely different of the one(s) where the plane entered the building. I’m very skeptical, especially because Bush didn’t even flinch when he was reading to kids when the planes struck…

It was real. A real inside job. A real travesty, a real tragedy, real people died.

no planes hit building 7 though
and the hole in the ground in Shanksville was not from a passenger plane – there were no seats, no remains, no nothing – just a smoking hole.

cave people from Afghanistan did that? They also gave NORAD stand down orders?

I was also alive on 9/11. I was in school when it happened, but we heard about it pretty quickly and when I got to a TV hours later, I was quite surprised to see that it was way worse than I imagined it as.

The 2002 documentary and the book ‘Above Hallowed Ground’ do a good job of showing the significance of what occurred that day.

Hitman wrote:

Russky wrote:

So this has been planned ahead of time

yeah, i’d say so..
but these guys who said it wasn’t “real ” are delusional.

I wouldn’t hate on them. They can be misguided and misinformed, but what’s driving them – is noble – the quest for truth and justice.

I’ve been studying everything about 9/11 I could find for years and years. And there are some wild theories that are over the top or don’t make sense. But that shouldn’t be the reason to paint all truthers with a wide brush, discredit them and because of that – accept the official story.
Crazy conspiracy theorists make the rest of reasonable people look bad, and that’s a real problem.
People shouldn’t look at things as black or white.
If some people believe that jewish reptiloids from outer space killed JFK – that’s crazy, but that doesn’t automatically mean that anyone who questions a magic bullet official story is crazy too. You know what I mean?

People who don’t believe there were planes involved in 9/11 have some reasons to believe so. I personally don’t think so, but there would be only one way to find out for sure – a repeat experiment.
We’d see if planes would go over 500 mph without falling apart, if they would penetrate steel girders and if they’d crumble, bounce back and fall to the ground.

No-plane truthers look at video compression artifacts and think that this is a proof that planes were computer-generated or holograms. They don’t understand that if they shot a flying bird with a camera made in 2000 with digital zoom on and then recorded it using compression algorithms – that bird would also look like it wasn’t real.

I am much more annoyed at people who refuse to acknowledge anything fishy about 9/11 and blindly trust the government story. Much more annoyed. F~~~ing head-in-the-sand retards.
But I don’t hate on them either. They’re just victims of brainwashing. Very sad.

Wait i never said anything about 9/11 the most i believe that is a conspiracy with it is that israel had prior knowledge to the attacks and had mossad agents on buidings recording it. I don’t know if there was a bomb or anything nor do i believe that you could put explosives in the elevator shaft of a building without getting caught.

But mgtow should have its own board if it does however dive into conspiracy’s so we can at least contain it.

Russky wrote:

Well, see, the problem with imploding buildings is that you need weeks to wire it, not 6 hours.

Actually the implosion argument is not a good one. Buildings like the WTC are designed to “implode” in the event of catastrophic structural failure because dropping straight down into themselves is infinitely preferable to toppling over sideways like a giant domino.

Regardless of what you think caused the catastrophic structural failure, the towers themselves behaved exactly as they were originally designed to do. So while it does take weeks to plan out an implosion, in the case of the WTC those weeks were spent back in the 1960s, years before the foundations were even dug.