9/11

The plane was shot down.
Story got changed the next day.

The globalists/elites did it. F~~~ those sick f~~~s.

For all of you who keep talking about s~~~ like footage of planes hitting the twin towers proves no conspiracy or you just don’t believe it you are the guys who know very little about building 7. It fell down the same afternoon, no plane hit it. It was barely damaged in one corner, yet fell straight down as if demolished. It was damaged by debris from the towers coming down… Now, it would take more than a few hours to rig it and bring it down, therefore it was rigged beforehand. On top of that it would have to of been rigged for demolition while one corner of it was burning and it was filled with smoke…Buildings of this size are not rigged in a matter of hours to fall…We are talking more like a month of work. Also, if it was ordered to be done, where is the footage of all the trucks and men brave enough to go into a burning smoke filled building so that they could demolish it right away??? All the other arguments mean jack f~~~ing s~~~, this one here is all you need to know.

9/11 was an inside job, you would have to be a f~~~ing moron of epic proportions to believe otherwise. The beneficiaries of 9/11 are Sunni Saudis, Israel, and U.S. Imperialist, Oil, and Opium interests in the Mid East vs. predominantly those Israel wants destroyed (Libya/Iran/Iraq/Syria…) It is a three sided bulls~~~ machine over there that keeps fabricating reasons to go to war against sometimes common “enemies”.

So, Saudis were on those planes right? When do we attack Saudi Arabia? Oh, that’s right, we just gave them 100 Billion in arms right? The longer we are at war continuing to fabricate reasons for destruction such as in Libya/Syria… the more obvious the whole pile of s~~~ becomes. It’s all bulls~~~, if you are one who cannot see it, oh well, you are not as Red Pill as you think. Because to swallow the official story you would have to believe that on the same day something that never happened before happened three times. Steel buildings fell straight down from fire three times… Disregard the Towers for a second and realize that in the case of Building 7 it was barely on fire and barely damaged, yet fell straight down, everything failing inside it all at once… Yea f~~~ing right.

Hitman wrote:

It was allowed to happen.

Agreed, none the less, very bad day that shaped my generation into warriors.

You will never convince someone who believes the official story otherwise and vice-versa.

No point in trying. People believe what they want.

The government would never lie to people, and radical religion is simply misunderstood.

Oh look! A sports game and popstar is on TV!

Anonymous wrote:

Manspread Mansplainer wrote:

The government would never lie to people.

lol you summed up Sidecar, that is if you clarify that by saying U.S. Government…

LOL it wasn’t directed at anyone, I’ve been seeing this unfold all over the interwebs today. Division and accusation of being a ‘traitor’ or ‘sheep’.

Bush just happened to be reading a story to kids (btw watch the full video of that it’s creepy) and Cheney wouldn’t harm a fly.

It took how many years to find Bin Laden because well, he was so elusive with his kidney dialysis machine.

Anonymous wrote:

When exactly was I “schooled on this”?

I believe around this same time last year. But you never, ever learn.

Or are you saying Building 7 fell straight down

Just like it was designed to do.

a little fire

It was a big fire. A very big fire. And it was left to burn for hours without any fire suppression whatsoever in a building with fireproofing rated for just an hour or two. And that had never happened in the U.S. before.

Have any video evidence of other non demolished steel buildings falling like this?

No other such building has ever been left to burn for hours and hours like that in the U.S. but there have been other examples of vertical pancaking in other construction methods. There were a bunch of examples in school, the lesson basically being: “This is why we design for vertical failure modes now.”

In fact IIRC Building 7 was an interesting case because its foundation was originally designed for a different building footprint than was eventually built, and so some serious work had to go into the design of some of the floors to ensure sideways stability and load balancing during a potential failure.

I can link plenty of videos of steel buildings still standing after being burned out, completely…In fact, that’s what they all do.

Because they all still had functioning fire suppression. In fact that’s the reason why they are all required to have functioning fire suppression. But because we are not all idiots they are also required to pancake straight down, should the fire suppression fail. Up until 9/11 that had never happened in the U.S., but it was still a contingency in the code.

anyone who has been here long enough knows who likely signs your checks.

Grow the f~~~ up or go back to /pol/.

And learn some f~~~ing civil engineering while you’re at it.

Next you’ll be telling me I’m mind controlled by THE JOOOZ.

Manspread Mansplainer wrote:

You will never convince someone who believes the official story otherwise and vice-versa.

But I don’t believe “the official story”. I go with what I and other engineers know about construction. If the “official story” on building 7 were contrary to what we know, there would be dozens of qualified civil engineers all crying “bulls~~~”. Instead it’s just f~~~wits on the internet who wouldn’t know a dead load from the s~~~ in their heads.

Oh, but they have a “clever” answer to that too. Every single civil engineer in the country must have been paid off by the conspiracy. How very convenient.

The real 9/11 “conspiracy” is all about people and what they did, not buildings.

to Sidecar
Are you f~~~ing nuts ??? “They where designed so” ???
Buildings ( other than industrial chemical complexes witch has large windows instead walls, and are designed to blow out walls in case of emergency and yet do its all possible to withstand the emergency ( when the walls are out ) ) are designed to WITHSTAND AT ALL F~~~ING TIMES AND AT ALL F~~~ING CASES POSSIBLE what this world can bring on … and you talk about it was designed to fall ? are you f~~~ing serious ???
im out of words …. go eat your grass … sheep ..

Anonymous wrote:

For all of you who keep talking about s~~~ like footage of planes hitting the twin towers proves no conspiracy or you just don’t believe it you are the guys who know very little about building 7. It fell down the same afternoon, no plane hit it. It was barely damaged in one corner, yet fell straight down as if demolished. It was damaged by debris from the towers coming down… Now, it would take more than a few hours to rig it and bring it down, therefore it was rigged beforehand. On top of that it would have to of been rigged for demolition while one corner of it was burning and it was filled with smoke…Buildings of this size are not rigged in a matter of hours to fall…We are talking more like a month of work. Also, if it was ordered to be done, where is the footage of all the trucks and men brave enough to go into a burning smoke filled building so that they could demolish it right away??? All the other arguments mean jack f~~~ing s~~~, this one here is all you need to know.

9/11 was an inside job, you would have to be a f~~~ing moron of epic proportions to believe otherwise. The beneficiaries of 9/11 are Sunni Saudis, Israel, and U.S. Imperialist, Oil, and Opium interests in the Mid East vs. predominantly those Israel wants destroyed (Libya/Iran/Iraq/Syria…) It is a three sided bulls~~~ machine over there that keeps fabricating reasons to go to war against sometimes common “enemies”.

So, Saudis were on those planes right? When do we attack Saudi Arabia? Oh, that’s right, we just gave them 100 Billion in arms right? The longer we are at war continuing to fabricate reasons for destruction such as in Libya/Syria… the more obvious the whole pile of s~~~ becomes. It’s all bulls~~~, if you are one who cannot see it, oh well, you are not as Red Pill as you think. Because to swallow the official story you would have to believe that on the same day something that never happened before happened three times. Steel buildings fell straight down from fire three times… Disregard the Towers for a second and realize that in the case of Building 7 it was barely on fire and barely damaged, yet fell straight down, everything failing inside it all at once… Yea f~~~ing right.

Perhaps it is time to turn off coast to coast and Thom Hartman, and come in off the ledge.

743 roadmaster wrote:

Perhaps it is time to turn off coast to coast and Thom Hartman, and come in off the ledge.

Coast to Coast is garbage about aliens, and Hartman is a Leftist pussy.

Pro-tip, when entering a discussion you should counter statements instead of posting a tin-foil hat picture and nothing more.

Sidecar, like I said, you can provide zero evidence of a single building falling like 7 did from small and brief fire. Southpark was entertaining last night though, it sure did “school me” on a lot of stuff more than you ever have…

And yea, designed to go down like that due to a small brief fire off in one corner? You are high as a kite. Why would they do that, people could still be inside and alive… So much one time no evidence of other occurrence bulls~~~ has to be believed to go along with the official story, that s~~~ right there is what Tin Foil Hats are made of.