70% Of Nonreciprocal Domestic Violence Is Started By Women – ABC Q&A Program

So last night I was subjected to a bout of televised, tax-payer funded man-bashing in the form of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s (ABC) panel-discussion program Q&A. The ABC is fully tax-payer funded here in Australia and as such is ‘meant’ (cough, cough) to be the home of balanced public debate, news and current affairs.

On this Q&A episode entitled ‘Alcohol, Violence, Sugar and Shakespeare’, the five-member panel comprised three women including feminist author Germaine Greer, so I suspected the discussion would be a little biased when it got to the segment entitled ‘Domestic Violence & Women’s Choices’.

The expected man-bashing and ‘women-are-victims’ ensued (all genders are victims, why discriminate?), but I was dismayed that neither of the male speakers had bothered to do their research and counter the attack. Neither man cited the 2007 Harvard Medical School report ‘Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner’. That report found that 70% of nonreciprocal domestic violence is initiated by women against men.

LINK – http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020

To quote the Harvard Medical School research –

“Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases.”

What’s more alarming is the male panelists included former psychiatrist and doctor Theodore Dalrymple. His gender aside, you would think someone with such qualifications would not ignore the raw research data (which Harvard have since tried to supress) and take such a blatant, gynocentric bias. The other male member of the panel was Australian musician Joseph Tawadros who didn’t have much to say and made no effort to call out the midsandry on show, probably worried he may lose some of his female fans if he dare call-out their male-bashing bulls~~~. And the mangina chair of the program, Tony Jones, made no attempt to restrain the man-bashing with any of this easily Googled data.

The reason I even bothered to research domestic violence after last night’s program was because of a recent discussion I had with a seemingly intelligent psychologist at a BBQ (cook-out). We somehow got onto men’s issues and he calmly noted how women conveniently gloss over the fact that they initiate domestic violence in equal or above-equal measure than men, be it against their partners or children (smacking the kids, being the first to strike physically in a fight etc.). On both of his claims my research revealed he was right. To quote the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau report entitled “Child Maltreatment 2012”

“In 2012, 54% of (child maltreatment) perpetrators were women and 45% of perpetrators were men.”

LINK 1) http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/childmaltreatment-facts-at-a-glance.pdf
LINK 2) http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm2012.pdf

I think we could also safely conclude that many men do not come forward or report the domestic abuse they are subjected to by their wives or girlfriends out of a sense of male pride or the stigma/shame that they were assaulted by the ‘weaker sex’.

I have never struck a woman, but I have been assaulted by one. In my 20s a girlfriend had way too much alcohol at a wedding, we got into an argument and after the cab-ride to the motel she started striking me with her fists. I grabbed her wrists with my hands to stop the blows until she stopped ranting and she eventually fell asleep. Seeing her go full-retard, I ended our relationship the next day when she was semi-sober and dropped her off at a bus station so she could buy a ticket to the nearest airport and fly back home to her parents. I didn’t suffer the full-blown ‘battered-husband’ syndrome, but it was enough to stop me putting my dick into crazy.

Anyway, last night’s biased Q&A got me thinking how “women’s issues” have become such an industry for academics, authors, women’s ‘charities’, social-workers, and the welfare system as a whole. Any evidence contrary to their one-eyed position is subverted and suppressed so that it does not threaten the continued funding of the misandry machine.

Alas, with shows like last night’s Q&A, my tax dollars are used by the feminist movement and media white-knights to craft a baseball bat of lies and disinformation to continually beat me and all men over the head with it. It’s total crap. At year’s end I should send the Australian Government a bill demanding my 14 cents-a-day back ( what every Australian pays to fund the ABC https://theconversation.com/does-the-abc-deliver-australians-good-bang-for-their-buck-25608 ).

After all, I could spend that 14 cents-a-day on something a little more honest like a prostitute or lawyers.

Here’s the link to the Q&A episode in question. Non-Australian viewers may require a VPN to get around regional geoblocking –

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s4424409.htm

I expect these sort of lies and deceit from women, but come on men, do your research and stop swallowing all the bulls~~~. Question everything! Even more reason to be MGTOW.