50's to now.

Topic by Broken-oak

Broken-Oak

Home Forums Relations~~~s 50's to now.

Tagged: 

This topic contains 11 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by Frank V.  Frank V. 2 years, 2 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #676997
    +3
    Broken-Oak
    Broken-oak
    Participant
    75

    You know how some red-pill men tend to dream about the days when women stayed in the kitchen, raised the kids and were docile homemakers without any job prospects or drive to even want to work?

    What gives? Do they want an adult child or worse, a mother? For f~~~s sake, I would think any man worth his salt would be repulsed by a needy, no life having, neurotic, baby machine that knows nothing more than to cook, clean, and offer nothing more than a half assed missionary f~~~ and divorce paperwork for her alimony because the government loves mindless lead anchors who spend a man’s money, makes more little tax payers, and continues to consume endlessly.

    What actual sanity is there when you raid churches and fake piety to get a holly homemaker, only to be sucked into the empty existence of the henpecked married man with kids and expenditures that he wouldn’t otherwise had if he was thinking with his brain, and not his dick.

    Then you have PUA’s and their hunger for pump and dump attitudes. PUA’s kinda sicken me to be honest because of their attraction to the modern woman. She either buys feminist ideals (I don’t need no man, except to pay my bills, marry me so I can have my day, provide me with kids and money, become boring because I kept making him change, and then get cash and prizes at the end), is fat and haaaaaappy (fat pride) or is so lost in the instant gratification of social media, and fake internet points that it borderlines addiction.

    That’s like taking everything that may have made a homemaker at least have some purpose, and throwing it away. I get that hook up culture has made sex into a feeding frenzy, but how much can you gorge yourself before you put down the fork or vomit from a distended gut.

    Look guys, I never wanted to be MGTOW. I never wanted to see women as horrible, and I was totally fine drinking the kool-aid. Every time someone who doesn’t understand why a man would choose to forgo relationships, intimacy, and feeling like he’s wanted tries to show a perverted version of what MGTOW is, I feel that. It burns, but I know that I chose to live like this for a reason, and it was for my health and my happiness. I guess it shows how much a man is willing to give before he finally stops.

    Sorry for the disjointed rant, and if it needs to be put in another section, feel free to do just that. I really just had to get some s~~~ off of my chest.

    #677004
    +4
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    I have no use for a women, I don’t need another mother, i have one.

    I don’t need a baby to take care off.

    I wanted a companion, but women just can’t be that, f~~~ then (not).

    Now I have my alien and we are Soo happy toguether.

    Who’s daddy little blood thirsty, insane, maniac alien life for?
    Soo cute

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #677018
    +3

    Anonymous
    5

    You know how some red-pill men tend to dream about the days when women stayed in the kitchen, raised the kids and were docile homemakers without any job prospects or drive to even want to work?

    I absolutely agree. It’s a disturbing concept to expect someone to be wholly dependent and subservient.
    I think the 50’s generation was the result of women growing up in the horror uncertainties of post Great Depression where the zenith of hypergamy was having a roof over your head, food on the table and an employed man. As our standard of living improved, hypergamy returned to it’s usual insatiable ruthlessness.

    I always dreamed of an independent partner. My only expectations were reciprocated loyalty and responsibility. It’s the kool-aid we all loved.

    The problem with this basic expectation is that we’re projecting male attributes onto women. It’s an aberration of nature the hive needs us to believe to continue to exploit men as resources.
    I know now, that in a modern world of gynocentric perspective and judicial bias, men are seen as enablers of women’s needs and wants. All relationships are simply indentured servitude for men, regardless of any external facade.

    Simply, if you stick your dick into it, no one in the world will care what she does to you, including the legal system.

    #677044
    +3
    OldBill
    OldBill
    Participant

    You know how some red-pill men tend to dream about the days when women stayed in the kitchen, raised the kids and were docile homemakers without any job prospects or drive to even want to work?

    An uncle of mine married one. In the end, he couldn’t stand her anymore. She never worked outside the home, never learned to drive, went to Mass every morning, kept the shades drawn, watched her “stories”, smoked like a chimney, etc. , etc. When he finally divorced her after nearly three decades, she simply moved in with a widowed sister and continued to live in the same narrow fashion.

    Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

    #677057
    +3
    JVB
    JVB
    Participant

    Aaahhhh!!! Yesss!!!

    The 1950’s ………….when chrome was thick and women were straight.

    Peace is > piece.

    #677085
    +5

    Anonymous
    12

    People did what they were told and what was expected of them just as they do now.

    Getting married and having kids in the 50’s is the modern day equivalent of getting tattoos and being a Leftard.

    Most people will choose the path that is well traveled.

    #677097
    +1
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35206

    People did what they were told and what was expected of them just as they do now.

    Getting married and having kids in the 50’s is the modern day equivalent of getting tattoos and being a Leftard.

    Most people will choose the path that is well traveled.

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    People are sheep…
    That pretty much explains the “success” of “social media”.

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #677100
    +1

    Anonymous
    42

    Feminism is terminal cancer, the West is dying!

    There’s no recovery from this, only death…

    #677109
    Boar
    Boar
    Participant

    You have written the long definition of AWALT. No matter what the packaging appears like: AWALT.

    Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

    #677306
    KevinStyles
    KevinStyles
    Participant
    2580

    Women today are too busy trying to take the role of the man. The problem is MEN have no desire to take the traditional role of the woman. Which creates power struggle and a vacancy on the traditional womans role and women resent us because we don’t want to be them. We didn’t ask them to be US so don’t expect US to be them.

    #677332
    +1
    Narwhal
    narwhal
    Participant

    You know how some red-pill men tend to dream about the days when women stayed in the kitchen, raised the kids and were docile homemakers without any job prospects or drive to even want to work?
    What gives? Do they want an adult child or worse, a mother? For f~~~s sake, I would think any man worth his salt would be repulsed by a needy, no life having, neurotic, baby machine that knows nothing more than to cook, clean, and offer nothing more than a half assed missionary f~~~ and divorce paperwork for her alimony because the government loves mindless lead anchors who spend a man’s money, makes more little tax payers, and continues to consume endlessly.

    I think you’re assuming that women back then behaved as modern women do…they just did it while working less. I don’t think that’s quite true as a woman’s value in society was tied to the happiness and success of her family. She could not just divorce her husband and say it was all his fault.

    I also think you’re assuming that a dependent relationship can’t be a happy and loving one, when the reality is that most loving relationships are not among equals. A pet owner loves their dog and the dog loves them back, even thought dog is dependent on the owner and the dog must obey his owner. Then there is the parent child relationship. The relationship between a man and his God, if he believes in one. In every successful organization, there is a leader who gives commands and dependents who are expected to follow orders.

    It’s rare to see a successful loving relationship where the members are equals. Yet society thinks that’s the best. It’s unthinkable to even suggest otherwise. Heck if you take the examples above, you can easily see how everything falls apart when a parent fails to lead his children, and a child will not follow his lead. A master who won’t discipline his dog ends up with a dog who’s unhappy and uncontrollable.

    All that said, I’m not saying I wish I lived in the 50’s, that we could go back to that time, or NAWALT. Just that I don’t think that’s a fair representations of the 50s. But what do I know, I wasn’t alive then.

    Ok. Then do it.

    #680844
    Frank V.
    Frank V.
    Participant
    2445

    Take a listen at some of the old radio shows I was given. A lot of this fondness for the “Good Old Days” has no bearing on what it was like.

    The term “Ball And Chain” used to describe a wife was nothing new 40 years when I was a kid !

    Frank V.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.