50 Years Asking Forevermore Privileges Women Expecting Men to Approach Them WTF!

MACHO wrote:

I have no doubt whatsoever that the hooker business is booming,

On the contrary, I’ve read articles that show it’s collapsing hard. Like whores can’t even give it away for a cheese sandwich.

The value of pussy is plummeting across the board.

Keymaster wrote:

“RooshV” tweeted: “Men who cold approach women should be proud of themselves”.

The f~~~ is a “cold approach”?

Why do PUAs have to come up with all this stupid terminology? Don’t they know it just shows what obvious bulls~~~ they’re trying to sell?

Keymaster wrote:

I remember the first time I heard of a “wingman” as if it takes more than ONE man to “talk to a woman”.

For the longest time I thought a “wingman” was there to stop you from f~~~ing women you’ll only regret later. Like in aviation, he’s there to cover your ass and keep you from waking up next to some fat ass coyote fugly slore because you drank way too much the previous evening to have enough sense of your own.

When I heard the PUA definition of “wingman” my first thought was: “What’s the point of that?”

narwhal wrote:

It’s actually the very same reason why women don’t want to ‘approach’ men. They don’t know what expect, they don’t want to risk the rejection. They just differ in that they fall back on the common excuse about how it’s the man’s job, etc.

It’s not a matter of them not wanting to risk rejection. They cannot handle rejection. Period. That’s why they fall back on the excuse that it’s somehow the man’s job, and then accuse men of being somehow “broken” for not approaching them. They can’t face the fact that men who don’t approach them have already rejected them.

That’s why instead of just giving their phone number to a man, they’ll ask him:

: “Aren’t you going to ask me for my number?”
: “Why would I do that?”

When a woman rejects a man, she tells him, “No.” At best. But when a man rejects a woman, he says nothing whatsoever.