50% of Minnesotans not married

It’s pretty f~~~ed up they always spin it as “female power” type s~~~ to only make men compete more for a woman to marry. But, if you ask me, it doesn’t really matter how they spin it. The point is, men aren’t married, and not getting their life force sucked out by some c~~~ bag. Hey, I’ll take this as a victory.

Anything to avoid admitting that it’s their own fault.

sidecar wrote:

Jan.Sobieski wrote:

women have more economic opportunities so they don’t need to rely on a husband.

Hahaha. “Need” to rely on a husband? Women have never needed to rely on a husband. Oh, no. Women want to rely on a husband.

The alternative is having to earn everything themselves, and trust me, they don’t want that.

They don’t mind the earning. It’s having to pay for their car, home, meals, etc that they have a problem with.

Jan Sobieski wrote:

The local news affiliate is reporting that a report coming out this week said that 50% of Minnesotans not married. They blamed the economy and wait for it…women have more economic opportunities so they don’t need to rely on a husband.

It is almost like there is a conspiracy to avoid mentioning that marriage is a bad deal for men.

There is a conspiracy to avoid mentioning marriage as a bad deal for Men, that’s why they resort to shaming tactics instead of reasoning. They have no real argument for marriage benefiting Men so they have to mask the real reasons why Marriage is taking a tumble in Minnesota or around the world for that matter.
They can try to cover it up but the truth won’t be stifled and more and more men are finding their own way away from the Plantation.

Will be interesting to see their statistics, because im supposing their going to say the economy is bad but yet within that frame work women have more economic opportunities? That won’t make any sense and will require some voodoo statistics to spin. Or perhaps the economy is bad and guys don’t want to eat a s~~~ sandwich on top of that.