13-year-old's father confronts teacher who sexually abused his son

They are calling it “Sexual Misconduct.”

If we reversed the genders this would be RAPE.

I like how that cuck husband defends his wife. “She made a mistake.”

He got cucked by a 13 year old. WTF is wrong with these people!?

She waited outside his home in her car. She encouraged him to sneak out of the house and get in her car. That is KIDNAPPING AND RAPE!!!

When the raw numbers are tallied it will be seen that women are the real abusers of children as such statistics have always shown.

“Sexual Misconduct” MY ASS!!!
It’s SEXUAL ASSAULT !!!
PUT THE MONSTERS IN PRISON UNTIL THE SUN DIES !!!

May God NEVER forgive them! EVER !!

iMickey503 wrote:

Mankind is not lost yet.

You high, Mickey ? hahahah

Constantine wrote:

When I was 13, I was not interested in dating. There were girls I had crushes on, but it didn’t go beyond that. I didn’t start thinking about relationships until I was closer to 15.
You can call me a late bloomer if you like, but that’s how it was. And I wasn’t the only one. None of my friends were especially interested in having girlfriends either. Some were even – oh the horror – more concerned with doing well at school. Personally, I think that’s a good pace at which to take it. Since 13 is only just out of the preteen years, it’s not really the right age to be worried about sex. I’d had my first kiss by then, sure, but wasn’t interested in sleeping with anyone.
Can’t pretend I wasn’t noticing girls, though. And yes, I even had some attractive teachers that I thought were kind of cute.
But if one of them had came on to me, I would’ve been weirded out.
Seriously. I wouldn’t have been enthralled, I would’ve been puzzled and freaked. Especially if she was married.
Why do people always assume that no harm has been caused “because he probably enjoyed it”?
Were these people there when the assault happened? Did they see his reaction? Did they know the kid personally? Did they have any notion of his daily interests? So who are they to make that assumption? When for all they know, he might’ve felt the same way about the occurrence that I certainly would have?!
Now don’t get me wrong, not everyone is the same. Girl-craziness has been known to happen in kids, even at 13. But since I, and a number of others, are living proof that the opposite can exist too, these idiots need to stop thinking that just because he’s a boy, he was automatically psyched about the idea of f~~~ing his teacher. And that any “sex” they had was totally consensual and amazing. Because unless video footage exists to show the encounter as such, they don’t know s~~~!
But most importantly, who gives a red f~~~ if the assault was “enjoyed”?! The slut took advantage of a minor!
Getting that odd sensation of déjà vu again. This is happening so frequently, we’re going round in circles. I’m running out of ways to rephrase my disgust. You’d like to imagine that the growing number of female paedophiles might send more guys our way, but her goddamn husband is defending that slime. Growing a brain seems beyond people’s reach.

Imagine if a person suggested that rape was okay if a woman seemed to “enjoy” it. They’d probably get hundreds of death threats.

A lot of things could theoretically be “enjoyed” by a victim that can’t psychologically process the event or understand things… a sick f~~~ could give a blowjob to a dog, or give cunnilingus to an infant. Maybe it “feels good” but NEITHER is capable of giving consent. I’m not even going into religious morality here.

This country has so many depraved degenerates that should be piled into a huge gasoline soaked pyramid and lit up so bright that it can be seen from space.

She talks like a child.

Gender is irrelevant. The idea that a boy might enjoy might enjoy it while a girl would not is just nonsense, beside being completely irrelevant.

When I was in HS, the male swimming coach was busted for sex with a female swimmer. It’s rumor, but the word was that she came on to him, and that story is entirely plausible. There was no reason to think that she didn’t want and enjoy the sex. Do we honestly think young girls never get the hots for a male authority figure? Having sex and getting attention from an authority figure is a big motivator, whether you’re a boy or girl.

That’s not to blame the minor involved in any way, regardless of the sex. The adult is always responsible. It does not matter who approached who, or if sex resulted in increased self esteem or better grades. If the law says a minor cannot consent, than he/she cannot consent.

Regarding the law though, there’s a part of me that thinks perhaps the law should be changed so that consent can be given below the age of 18 (14 maybe) if parental consent is given. A big percentage of kids are having sex under the age of 18 right now, and parents either are completely unaware or turn a blind eye. So we have generations of kids who don’t get parental guidance on one of the more important decisions in their lives. My parents were completely unaware of my dating activities and sex during my high school years, and I often regret some of the stupid decisions I made because I had no idea what I was doing. I try to talk to my kids about dating and such, even though they are just 12 and 14 because I know they aren’t ready for this on their own, same as I wasn’t ready.

The reality is that parents are responsible for their minor dependents, and allowing them to give consent, taking responsibility, makes sense on some levels. It’s also the reality that a lot, maybe most, are absolutely s~~~ty parents.

BTW, whether you’re kid is thinking about sex at 12-14 is somewhat irrelevant, as kids have to deal with this at that age anyway. These days, the girls will come up to you and blatantly ask you how big your dick is (My son’s response is “I’m tiny, you wouldn’t be interested”) or whether my daughter should go over to the lesbian girl’s house for a sleepover.

Ranger One wrote:

A lot of things could theoretically be “enjoyed” by a victim that can’t psychologically process the event or understand things… a sick f~~~ could give a blowjob to a dog, or give cunnilingus to an infant. Maybe it “feels good” but NEITHER is capable of giving consent. I’m not even going into religious morality here.

Exactly. Kids that young are not mature enough to process the impact of what’s going on. So to put it on them is exploiting them. People need to stop focusing on the “sexual fantasy” of “hot teacher seducing naïve student”, and accept that a crime has been committed. This c~~~ exploited his innocence and corrupted him. That should be all that matters.

Twist wrote:

So she coerced the child to lie to his parents via her intentional and deliberate actions. Damaging, if not destroying, the most important relationships of his young life. Grooming him for a life of lies and deception, perhaps one day paying his abuse forward by molesting a child himself? Abuse is generational – a well known rule. Hurt people, hurt people.

Couldn’t have said it better, man.

narwhal wrote:

When I was in HS, the male swimming coach was busted for sex with a female swimmer. It’s rumor, but the word was that she came on to him, and that story is entirely plausible. There was no reason to think that she didn’t want and enjoy the sex. Do we honestly think young girls never get the hots for a male authority figure? Having sex and getting attention from an authority figure is a big motivator, whether you’re a boy or girl.

Hell yes! There’s something else, too – people are always banging on about how “girls mature faster than boys”. It’s another grating catchphrase used to denigrate young men.

What they never seem to note is, if it were really the case, then a girl is less likely to be damaged by that experience. Because she’s “more mature” than a boy.

But the second a male teacher takes advantage of a teenage girl, suddenly it’s “she’s not mature enough to understand this act!” “Just because she acts mature, doesn’t mean that she’s ready for sex!” “She’s just a kid, how dare he take advantage of someone not mature enough to understand that!”

Take advantage of a teenage boy, however, and it’s, “Well sex is all they think about anyway”, “Teenage boys are so desperate to get laid, it’s not going to affect him”, “Victim, my ass!” and so on.

Suddenly, the boy is treated as the more mature of the two. What’s the message here? The same as every other – boys are only “more mature than girls” when it suits whichever narrative is being pushed this week.