----------WIP------------
ON TRADITIONALISM:

"We've been led to believe in the men's movement by traditionalist conservatives that the Right doesn't look at gender, that they teach that everybody is an individual under the law, that identity politics is a bastion and signature of the Left. Why then has it reared its ugly head in the TradCon Right for everyone to see once the chance of real equality enshrined into the Constitution makes itself available?"

"Now lets talk about non-feminism. This purveyor of feminism as the great evil and injustice of our time mentality. What says the non-feminist here? I mean have you looked up from your gnashing of teeth at your golden shrine of antifeminism? Have you looked up yet to notice that while you were indulging in your ten-minutes hate of feminism over and over again, a woman called Phyllis Schlafly, about as non-feminist as they come, mobilized a political reckoning that stopped an amendment to the United States Constitution barring discrimination based on sex? Would you care to explain to me just how the feminists are responsible and to blame for this one?"

"The Traditionalist schiblif of protecting women from harm at all costs is responsible for the failure of the Equal Rights Amendment and all of the ensuing opportunities that men will have missed out on henceforth. This should exist as a lesson to us that its not just feminists who want a special kind of equality when it comes to women, That for all of their talk about Libertarian values and for all of their sanctimonious flag-worshipping liberty and freedom for all bullshit, (Traditionalists) are still just as guilty of a desire to have institutionalized privileges for women. They justify it by selling men a plate of pig slop dripping with chivalry and outdated tradition, they cover it up in euphemisms and homemaking and family values, but in the end telling men that you should face the possibility of getting shot at more than a women for the same amount of freedoms, is no better and certainly not one iota above the typical feminist brand of jurisprudence that has led us to affirmative action for women or any other one of the injustices leveled against men under the operating assumption that women should be entitled to extra protections or exemptions simply for being female."
(Barbarossa - Traditionalism and Feminism, the Great Gynocentrisms of Our Time)

ON GYNOCENTRISM:

"Gynocentrism ...is a biologically driven instinct to protect women. This instinct is in both men and women, though manifests itself differently. The overall effect is society ...being hypersensitive to female suffering, and callus to male suffering. It is society being hyper aware of dangers and injustices to women, while being oblivious to dangers and injustices to men. It is, quite frankly, a matter of putting women first."

"The reason ...is simple: for a species to survive, it must reproduce ...If the female is the limiting factor (in reproduction), than her life and her safety, is more important. It will hurt a species significantly more to have 20% of its female population killed, than it would to have 20% of its male population killed. Thus we have evolved with an instinct to protect women and keep them safe. This instinct is in both men and women. Women instinctively look out for the well being of women, and men instinctively look out for the well being of women."

"Females are more important to the survival of the species than the male, thus a species must behave in a way that prioritizes the well being of the females ahead of the males. This is Gynocentrism."

"Once you fully understand this, you will see why men pursue women in mating, why women are very picky, and view themselves as deserving. You will understand the origin of their narcissism, their entitled attitude; Why our culture says “women and children first”; Why women’s cancers and diseases receive more funding; Why women are given lighter sentences and kept out of jail more; Why men pay the bulk of the taxes and women receive the bulk of the entitlement programs; Why women are seen as victims, and men are seen as dangerous."

"Women are instinctively wired to take all of their safety and luxury for granted, and to see themselves as underprivileged, or victimized, endangered or persecuted. Women are just doing what they were born to do: looking out for their own kind, and viewing the world from the lens of “how does this effect women” without stopping to care and asking themselves “how does this effect men”.

Women instinctively believe that safety and well being is a thing reserved for women, and it is not reserved for men, because the role of men is to look out for the safety and well being of women (men are to protect and provide), and to part with their own safety and well being if necessary. Men must make sacrifices to keep women safe and well. The safety and well being of men, is not in the equation, thus they are blind to male suffering and injustice."
(RBK - Gynocentrism - The Heart of What MGTOW Fights)

ON "GAME":

"Lets talk about what defines game in the game community: We're talking about a group of people that obsessively study what women want, and more specifically how women want them to act, and then give it to them in exchange for pussy, and this gives them a sense of value and manhood since of course game is about the validation of masculinity through women"
(Barbarossa - PUA Roissy on MGTOW)

"'Game' is dependent on female sexual dominance. This dominance translates to all areas of male endeavor. It is a stifling, wasteful expenditure of male vitality... Simply put, when male excellence is at a standstill, and females have some access to some external source of sustenance or advantage over men, you will see game arise, since game at it's core is a prolonged game of cutthroat amongst men for access to females."

"Now when the state bankrolled female dominance over men in poor urban areas via welfare and other subsidies, the males since they were essentially strong-armed into equal economic status were forced to find other ways to differentiate themselves to women, and this is when male competition, the driving force of civilization, makes the transition from healthy male vs male competition, to often times ultra-violent, economically destructive, poverty-inducing, gynocentric male vs male competition."

"Scientific discovery is derived from healthy male vs male competition. When Niels Bohr and Einstein were battling it out for the acceptance of quantum mechanics, the fervor in which these two heavyweights were taking shots at each other is the stuff of legend, but what differentiates this form of competition between that of game, is that there exists an end result, something is produced, society is rewarded with something as a result of this conflict, but in game the only thing produced was a sex act"
(Barbarossa - Deconstructing Game and PUA Frauds)

------ WIP -------