Revolutionary male birth control easy as flipping a switch

[FIDKParticipant 32]

While it looks like a painful surgery, basically he suggests putting a little valve in there that you can turn on when you want a kid, but is off the rest of the time. Read the article,

German carpenter Clemens Bimek has crafted a male contraception “switch” – a valve that can stop, or start, the flow of sperm. The revolutionary invention, if approved, could change men’s reproductive future, turning a permanent vasectomy into a relic of history.

https://www.rt.com/news/328472-male-contraception-sperm-switch/

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Im sticking to waiting on Vasalgel,with this switch she will take you dancing and hold you tight for the sake of love while you’re drinking and thinking about sex she will flick the switch off,may not sound possible until I saw the story on a nurse giving oral to a guy putting his semen in a syringe and injecting it into her and has the nerve to go to the state for child support and WON! I never thought something like that could happen until it did.

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[AttonParticipant]

It sounds like a rather good concept but it needs a hell of a lot of refinement.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[WolfParticipant 890]

I saw that article on Friday. Personally, I don’t like it. As eluded above, a deceitful woman can still trick you by flicking the switch after you had a few drinks. It’s certainly not out of the realm of possibility for a woman who wants to get pregnant.

I advocate for a vasectomy, which is what I have done. She’s not getting at my sperm without cutting my nuts open with a scalpel!

For those that just want a temp form of male birth control, I think science nowadays can do better. However, there doesn’t seem to be much appetite for helping men to control whether or not they impregnate, other than a condom (which sucks) or abstinence.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

As you say, if you can flick the switch, so can she – and afterwards she’ll say, “well if he didn’t want a kid, he could have always turned his switch off”.

[WolfParticipant 890]

Shiny wrote:

As you say, if you can flick the switch, so can she – and afterwards she’ll say, “well if he didn’t want a kid, he could have always turned his switch off”.

Or she (and society) can say…

“You had sex, now deal with the consequences!”

Some may think I’m paranoid, but the female birth control is supposedly up to 99% effective when taken properly. Yet, we consistently hear about unplanned pregnancies while she was on the pill. Far more than 1%. Do the math and come to your own conclusions.

[FIDKParticipant 32]

Vasectomies are not as reliable as they are purported to be. I highly advise against it. I have a buddy who had a surprise kid (he went back to make sure he was not shooting blanks.. he was not). Another buddy was so injured they had to cut the nerves in his spine to stop the b~~~~ack pain. He can’t walk right anymore. And still has to take painkillers.

I am sure I have come across dozens of men who have had successful vasectomies (they do not typically talk about it). But, 2 stories like that and I will never do it.

[WolfParticipant 890]

FIDK wrote:

Vasectomies are not as reliable as they are purported to be. I highly advise against it. I have a buddy who had a surprise kid (he went back to make sure he was not shooting blanks.. he was not). Another buddy was so injured they had to cut the nerves in his spine to stop the b~~~~ack pain. He can’t walk right anymore. And still has to take painkillers.

They are just as effective as any other form of birth control. Certainly more so than a switch installed in your body. With a switch, all the plumbing is still connected – with a vasectomy, it’s not.

Are you saying that he was still shooting sperm after the vasectomy?

When I had my vasectomy, I was told to continue using another form of birth control for 3 months. After that, my semen was tested in order to determine if there was any sperm, and there was not.

It is possible for the procedure to not work, hence the testing three months later.

There are also different procedures for a vasectomy. I was talking to a guy last week who’s reluctant to get it done because he thought there would be some big needle injected into his b~~~~. That is not correct.

The procedure I had was very straight forward. An incision was made in the scrotum less than a centimeter long. The vas deferens were pulled out, a piece was cut out, the ends were burned, and clamps were put on each end. They were then tucked back in, and the incision was glued.

Not sure how such a simple procedure could cause severe pain in the scrotum. He must have had an entirely different procedure.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Until a male pill (which femanists will block), only park your dick in your hand or a pay by the hour parking space.

Women have all the control and the more dick you give them …. the more control they have over you.

Use the big head.

[RoyDalParticipant]

RE: @wolf‘s post. It’s a simple calculation to determine a man’s odds. If he scores 50 times with a female who has 1% odds of getting pregnant, then his odds of becoming a daddy are 39%.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 0]

OH I can just hear it now.
Are you turned on tonite baby?
OR
I didn’t do it. It must have been an “accident” (sarcasm)
I would never turn you on without your permission. (Heavy sarcasm)
He turned on without my permission. What a beast. I’m a victim. (It never stops)

No matter what happens, a scheming woman will always find a way to make it your fault.
This is one of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard. I had a vasectomy when Is was 28 and have never regretted it. (63 now).

[Anonymous 29]

FIDK wrote:

While it looks like a painful surgery, basically he suggests putting a little valve in there that you can turn on when you want a kid, but is off the rest of the time. Read the article,

German carpenter Clemens Bimek has crafted a male contraception “switch” – a valve that can stop, or start, the flow of sperm. The revolutionary invention, if approved, could change men’s reproductive future, turning a permanent vasectomy into a relic of history.

https://www.rt.com/news/328472-male-contraception-sperm-switch/

This is a three decade old technology.
The switch that you see is actually rather large.

Those who had money for the implant of the taps had it good and less than half the size of the one in the picture.
But needless to say, awareness of this type of male birth control should be more widely spread.
While it does cost to have it done it gives a guy a s~~~ load of advantage and security.

[Anonymous 42]

boing, boing, boing, garbagecan for three points,,,,,,,swish! Right where she belongs! and look, NO BABY! MG-Tower for the win!!!

[narwhalParticipant]

Do not want. Besides not wanting mechanical parts down there, I also do not want the possibility of control of my reproduction capabilities to be in the hands of others. Many have mentioned the possibility of a female partner getting control. What about parents of minors? What about the government?

It starts off with parents understandably wanting to add the switch to their boys under 18. Then the government will install it in males who have committed certain crimes. Since it’s not permanent, it will be more acceptable. Then it will be installed in any male that doesn’t have a high enough credit rating or financial savings. Then, we’ll switch to stud/farming society to get better genetic stock.

I see unintended consequences all over this.

Ok. Then do it.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

We need to have a pill. I ain’t getting cut.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[HitmanParticipant]

I ain’t getting cut either!

[Anonymous 42]

I don’t like needles and knives! go cut and stab someone else’s flesh! CREEPY!

[tripvanParticipant 193]

Could you imagine a psycho bitch dig her nails in and rip that thing out because you didn’t want to turn it on?

Could happen. Ah the possibilities…

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

RoyDal wrote:

If he scores 50 times with a female who has 1% odds of getting pregnant, then his odds of becoming a daddy are 39%.

That’s not what the “failure rate” means. It’s a yearly thing. If the birth control pill is “99% effective for perfect use” that means that if a hundred woman use it perfectly for a year, by the end of the year one of them will get pregnant.

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[Author]

Posts