When we ourselves talk or hear other men talk about women, especially a collective of women, in a critical and unapologetic way, one of the many supposed rebuttals that we hear, apart from shaming tactics, is NAWALT and its variations.

For those who do not know, NAWALT is the acronym for Not All Women Are Like That. Other variations of NAWALT include NAFALT where F is for feminists.

As such,I would like to talk today about the NAWALT argument. Specifically, why the NAWALT argument is pointless and irrelevant when we speak of the human female collective..

The reasons for the NAWALT irrelevance boils down to two things :- Systems and Incentives.

The reality is that the systems and incentives that are currently in existence in many parts of the world allow women to do whatever they want and whenever they want with little to no consequences whatsoever. Consequently, there is no reason for women to hold back or think through their actions. Why bother doing such petty actions when you have a myriad of safety nets covering your arse should you go full retard ?

If women falsely accuses men of rape or violent assault and they are discovered doing that, they get next to nothing. At worst, they get a slap on the wrist. If their false accusations were not discovered, their word are almost always believed as true.

If women assault men or rape them, either nothing happens to the women or once again, thanks to pussy pass, they, at most, get a slap on the wrist combined with society making up excuses for them. For instance, observe the rising reports of female teachers raping young boys in north American schools and see what happens to these women. Next to nothing.

If women divorce men on a whim or because of feels, nothing happens either. They get half the man’s stuff, his car, his house and custody of his kids most of the time.

If women choose to enter a particular profession, they have tons of affirmative action, diversity policies and “equality” laws at their side. Oh, and they have white knighting men and corporations who will bend over backwards to accomodate for them or let them in.

If women cheat or commit adultery, there is almost no consequence for it either. In fact, this is seen as a form of female empowermen. It is usually the man’s fault. Par for the course really.

If women are broke or homeless or decided to do stupid things like get pregnant while in their teens, they have a welfare system that full supports their life choices with checks every month. What’s worse is that welfare checks in USA will make you get more money than a postgraduate student.

If women commit crimes, they are guaranteed to get lesser sentencing or no sentencing depending on how much of a feminist or white knighting fools the judges and the juries are.

In addition to all this, there are legions of moronic Sir White Knightingtons who are willing to play Captain Save-A-Hoe for women instead of letting women fend for themselves. Titanic anyone ?

I can keep going on and on and on but the essence of it is this :- When you have a system that allows a group of people to get away with whatever they do and want, they will act on their self interest and focus on seeking their own gratification with little regard to anything else. Why should they give a damn about anything else ? They are getting to have their cake and eat it too.

This is why, no matter how nice a woman might be, no matter if she is a NAWALT or not, no matter if NAWALTs exist or not, men still face a big risk when they interact with women. Because the systems and incentives in place allow any and all women, no matter if they are NAWALT or not, to go full retard and f~~~ you up with little to no consequences for doing so. NAWALTs are irrelevant because the exist in a system which allows them to go full blown AWALTs with no problems.

As such, will you, as a man, rely on the fragile and whimsical notion that women might be good ? That she might not make uses of the systems to cash in on its rewards ? That she might remain good for long periods of time ? That you might have to beg with her or parlay with her endlessly to ensures she remains good and not use the systems in place ? I say that only a man who is desperately addicted to women, white knights and manginas of the worst degree, will do such things.

A thinking man, a rational man, a sensible man, a practical will not rely on slim chances. They will not rely on irrelevant deflections. A thinking man will look at all that is going on and be cautious when he is dealing with women, out of a sense of self-preservation. A thinking man will use his rational mind, not his dickhead and not his emotions when interacting with women. Most importantly, a thinking man will not rely on theoreticals like NAWALT.

Cheers.

I don’t even think that way anymore ….. it’s as simple as breathing.

Yep. It doesn’t matter if you find a NAWALT, you are in a system engineered to profit off of your mistakes, a system designed for you to fail, in which women are weaponized to aid in that process. At any moment, a woman can ruin you or attempt to ruin you with hardly any consequences for her.

I would add profit from your success if not your very existence.

I sometimes really want to believe in the NAWALT, but a woman can do an 180 at any time, the second she does, she has all your extra lives, and spawn point in her claws, lol.

Even if the playing field should finally get even again, I only see it as a timesink, better spent on furthering your own dreams, than chasing some tail.

EWALT (enough women are like that) I’ll have a better chance at beating “battle toads” than finding a NAWALT.

Battletoads was freaking hard! Would a game genie help?

Ewalt, newalt, whatever walt are all irrelevant.

There is no such things as nawalt. Every western woman will always find some way that she has been “wronged” as justification for her decisions.

Now ain’t that just the absolute truth. After a while, you just gotta get tired of the fukery, and be done with it. Period.