So, as some of you might know, I started the whole thread about racists black men, sometime ago. At the time I didn’t see what was worng with the thread, and for the most part I still don’t. My aim, at that moment, was to criticize men that uses their skin color as an excuse to try and divide Mgtow (or to try to blame tohers for their won failures, for that matter). And although that seemed to be the general consensus at that post, some friction was still generated.

After reading some coments and put some though, I would like to apologize for the way I expressed my views. Note that, I am not apologizing for criticizing those men I criticized on that video. I still think that racism is racism no matter what color of your skin is. However I don’t believe that the ends justify the means, and although that thread showed that Mgtow, at least here, are in a consensus when it comes to the “race” issue (which is… it doesn’t matter what is yours, men are men. period.), it also caused some unecessry attriction.

I am guessing that this might be because of my use of words, and because of that, maybe the message I was trying to convey was diluted and/or missed. I don’t back off when I think the conflict is necessary, but I also apologize when I think I did wrong and upon further analysis I am reaching the conclusion that, in this case, there was no need for generating conflict.

I would like to point out a few things though:

– I don’t think any “race” has a pass for not being held to a minimum standard. My opinion on stupid people is equally low, regardless of the “race” of the person showing poor judgement skills (wether it is racism, or any other type of ill/stupid/detrimental “belief”. SPECIALLY, when said belief is to the detriment of men, because pussy said so).

– I don’t think political correctness is a good thing either. People should be able to try to express their opinions, and we (people in general) should judge such opinions based on their CONTENT, not SEMANTICS, or FEELINGS. I still prefer a painfull truth then a cosy LIE. And a little of common sense and sense of humor can do wonders.

That said, I may have been a little too coarse on the way I dealt with the subject at hand. Also, this place, mgtow.com, is, after all, a place for mgtows to get together, and if that thread made divise when, on the core, people agree on their ideals, then it backfired, and for that I do apologize.

Make no mistake though. I am not apologizing for other people’s feelings or to “dodge” any consequence of my actions. I am apologizing for my own sense of justice, since I am starting to think I should have been able to handle that subject better.

Anyway, that’s what I have to say.

Have a good weekend you all.

Cheers

Also I think it is important for Non White MGTOW’s to understand that White men were the first men targeted by Feminism and Marxism and that if you want to demonize a race, gender or sexuality than pick on a White Straight Guy and no one will say a word.

So what you posted was spot on and from what I saw most of us agreed with you.

The fact that you have BOTH the conscious and GUILT to make an apology thread, is demosntobable of the fact that your intentions were sincere, but also this “white guilt” complex is systemic.

You did NO wrong by calling out a black racist. I think it was a healthy post.

Hats off to you.

When I listen to some of the artistic talent they created I am moved beyond words. Simply inspirational.

The problem becomes when EVERY issue is racist. Even if it occurred before EITHER of us even existed. I believe the media attempts to drive blacks against whites, and THAT created a false sense of division that doesnt even exist.

From my perspective as a white man I can say this: the ONLY division I feel with blacks, is that THEY view ME as racist. Which I will NOT tolerate, because I am not.

(thunderous applause…)

(…continues)

“Wait a second.”

BTW just joking.

You did fine.

If I was in a corporate office workplace, I’d frequently point out that I looked scruffy and needed a promotion at work to buy a new suit and managers might overlook our team’s performance due to other teams looking better and being more presentable to clients. If the women in my team wanted to promote a woman to leadership instead I’d suggest taking up donation plate to buy me new threads. My being promoted would probably be seen as the lessor evil. Appealing to a woman’s fashion sense and their perception of themselves as being lowered by others new handbags or better colour co-ordination or people they work with or other vanity can work wonders for motivating women to do things that are in your favour.

Women are vain, I believe firmly in using them not just as sex toys but to achieve whatever it is I want. I’d even stoop so low as to use feminists to demonise men, women and those unsure to get a pay rise. All hail the dollar!

Roy Dal: Damn, I must be a crummy person! I’m a firm believer in using women to achieve my goals.

If I was in a corporate office workplace, I’d frequently point out that I looked scruffy and needed a promotion at work to buy a new suit and managers might overlook our team’s performance due to other teams looking better and being more presentable to clients. If the women in my team wanted to promote a woman to leadership instead I’d suggest taking up donation plate to buy me new threads. My being promoted would probably be seen as the lessor evil. Appealing to a woman’s fashion sense and their perception of themselves as being lowered by others new handbags or better colour co-ordination or people they work with or other vanity can work wonders for motivating women to do things that are in your favour.

Women are vain, I believe firmly in using them not just as sex toys but to achieve whatever it is I want. I’d even stoop so low as to use feminists to demonise men, women and those unsure to get a pay rise. All hail the dollar!

Attack their weaknesses, avoid their strengths. Attack is always better than defense. Know your enemy and you have won before the war starts. This is straight out of Sun Tzu’s Art of War, Machiavelli’s The Prince and Robert Greene’s 48 Laws of Power! Take your pick.

I cannot extol those books enough. That goes double for 48 Laws of Power. If you want to survive, live long, and prosper in a hostile hierarchy, then you need this knowledge. Hint: All hierarchies are inherently hostile to those who can’t obey their unwritten rules.

P.S: The very first slave owner was a black man by the way.