So we, the enlightened products of Hollywood movies where women are strong and smart and men weak, neurotic and stupid and a society where the submissive and horny women-defender is the standard for a “good” male, completely disagree with what Orpheus, the proto-father of Greek philosophy said some 3500 years ago: “There is nothing more doggish and detestable than women.” It would be absurd and idiotic to interpret my thought as women-hating. I have a spouse who I appreciate like all other beings on this planet. Do you hate an ant when it bites you, a dog when it barks at you or a mule when it kicks you? Do you say to a cobra: “O, you are so mean, I’m so disappointed”? Of course not. This is the nature of the being, and it cannot do otherwise. It is your fault that you don’t understand this fact and produce false expectations, that you are dependent. By the way, the German word for “disappoint” is “ent-täuschen” which means “stop being deceived”. When you are disappointed this is the end of deception.

In order to have a better understanding look at the ancestors. The ancestors of a man are the priests of Egypt and Sumer, Orpheus, the authors of the Bhagavat Gita, the Chinese philosophers, Thales, Democritus, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zenon, Chrysippus, Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius…. Yes, we are heirs of godlike men. As for women, they are the heirs of…. well, women. Or can you name me a female pendant of Socrates, of Siddhartha Gautama, of Confucius? Again: this does not mean that women are worse, just that they are different. The problem with not understanding this is the reason for the attachment 99% of heterosexual men feel for women. But one can evaluate an issue in an objective manner only if one has at least some distance thereto. So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”. And imagine how would you react if a different species (for ex a panda) did it. You don’t show a surge of e(vil)-motions, caprices, weakness. On the contrary – you show mild affection, you show that you are in control, that you are strong, disciplined and just. You curb your expectations and know that the other being might behave in a strange and illogical way.

I’m not going to speak for anybody else here. Knowing that I’m smarter, faster, stronger and deficient in all three to no woman that I’ve ever met didn’t prevent me from making a series of mistakes. I don’t hang out with Cobras, or Koalas, or Polar Bears; that’s exactly what the majority here do. The animals are better left to the zoo keepers that want to deal with their daily feeding and crap.

Call me a radical feminist but I find women great, amazing. They are amazing for… women. They are just different. No, not different the way you think. They are a different species with different mental processes, different behavior and different goals. Again, they are neither worse nor better – just different. Like dogs or skunks or else. In no way do I think that women are comparable to dogs. Dogs are quadruped, what is not the case with women (well, except when they are drunk or being doggy-styled). Dogs bark…., women, hmm, well women also do. BUT: dogs are loyal and true till the end no matter if you are poor, depressed or else. So, you see, women significantly differ in certain relationships from dogs and other species.
So we, the enlightened products of Hollywood movies where women are strong and smart and men weak, neurotic and stupid and a society where the submissive and horny women-defender is the standard for a “good” male, completely disagree with what Orpheus, the proto-father of Greek philosophy said some 3500 years ago: “There is nothing more doggish and detestable than women.” It would be absurd and idiotic to interpret my thought as women-hating. I have a spouse who I appreciate like all other beings on this planet. Do you hate an ant when it bites you, a dog when it barks at you or a mule when it kicks you? Do you say to a cobra: “O, you are so mean, I’m so disappointed”? Of course not. This is the nature of the being, and it cannot do otherwise. It is your fault that you don’t understand this fact and produce false expectations, that you are dependent. By the way, the German word for “disappoint” is “ent-täuschen” which means “stop being deceived”. When you are disappointed this is the end of deception.
In order to have a better understanding look at the ancestors. The ancestors of a man are the priests of Egypt and Sumer, Orpheus, the authors of the Bhagavat Gita, the Chinese philosophers, Thales, Democritus, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zenon, Chrysippus, Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius…. Yes, we are heirs of godlike men. As for women, they are the heirs of…. well, women. Or can you name me a female pendant of Socrates, of Siddhartha Gautama, of Confucius? Again: this does not mean that women are worse, just that they are different. The problem with not understanding this is the reason for the attachment 99% of heterosexual men feel for women. But one can evaluate an issue in an objective manner only if one has at least some distance thereto. So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”. And imagine how would you react if a different species (for ex a panda) did it. You don’t show a surge of e(vil)-motions, caprices, weakness. On the contrary – you show mild affection, you show that you are in control, that you are strong, disciplined and just. You curb your expectations and know that the other being might behave in a strange and illogical way.

You f~~~ing Mangina! F~~~ off…

…Do you hate an ant when it bites you, a dog when it barks at you or a mule when it kicks you?…

No, I do not, What I do do is make sure that the circumstances which led to that event (in these analogies p~~~ing off the animals in question) are never allowed to reoccur and therefore I do not have to suffer the negative consequence again.

This is the nature of the being, and it cannot do otherwise

Congratulations, you just made our point for us. Women have their nature, and they cannot do otherwise, so we take the necessary actions to ensure we do not suffer the consequences of that nature, we go our own way.

So, forget your sexism, like they do in Sweden, and next time there is an issue concerning a woman, don’t say “She did this or that” but “It did this or behaved in this way”.

You’re not telling us anything we don’t already know so maybe you should have spent some more time reading threads. You are right about not saying she did this or that and getting angry. It’s the way they are programmed. We choose to accept it as-is and deal with it in the red pill manner.

Some of the Brothers here are fresh out of disastrous relations~~~s with one of these vapid creatures. Anger is a normal and healthy reaction for them at that stage. The anger eventually develops into a cold sterile detachment once one realizes the truth.

I refuse to worship before the all powerful vagina. I fully expect to be castigated by women and their servile manginas for my personal choice. Hold on let me check into something…..No, I still have zero f~~~s to give.

from Julie Bindel, one of the most influential feminist scholars, published today and no, she’s not kidding:

will heterosexuality survive women’s liberation?

It won’t, not unless men get their act together, have their power taken from them and behave themselves. I mean, I would actually put them all in some kind of camp where they can all drive around in quad bikes, or bicycles, or white vans. I would give them a choice of vehicles to drive around with, give them no porn, they wouldn’t be able to fight – we would have wardens, of course! Women who want to see their sons or male loved ones would be able to go and visit, or take them out like a library book, and then bring them back.

I hope heterosexuality doesn’t survive, actually. I would like to see a truce on heterosexuality. I would like an amnesty on heterosexuality until we have sorted ourselves out. Because under patriarchy it’s s~~~.

And I am sick of hearing from individual women that their men are all right. Those men have been shored up by the advantages of patriarchy and they are complacent, they are not stopping other men from being s~~~.

I would love to see a women’s liberation that results in women turning away from men and saying: “when you come back as human beings, then we might look again.”

http://www.radfemcollective.org/news/2015/8/29/an-interview-with-julie-bindel

No, I still have zero f~~~s to give.

DeepInThought wrote:

You f~~~ing Mangina! F~~~ off…

says it all for me, out the door you go….

go spew your bulls~~~ elsewhere