MGTOWYou want children? New law: You have no parental rights anymore – MGTOW https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/feed/ Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:55:07 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.5.14-6684 en-US https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/page/357/#post-48070 <![CDATA[You want children? New law: You have no parental rights anymore]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/page/357/#post-48070 Mon, 04 May 2015 12:01:04 +0000 Read an article that made me further realize why men in the west have no firm connection to their children. It took me years to learn this but for most here, I imagine it’s old news.

One of the very main tenets of feminism is that women must have total and complete control of all aspects of procreation to really control the world. This is clearly laid out in any woman’s studies book, especially ones that focus of feminist theory.

From Margaret Sanger: Born 1879

Men and women who have it in control and constantly use their brain cells thinking deeply, are never sensual.”[78][79] Sanger said that birth control would elevate women away from a position of being an object of lust and elevate sex away from purely being for satisfying lust, saying that birth control “denies that sex should be reduced to the position of sensual lust, or that woman should permit herself to be the instrument of its satisfaction.”[80] Sanger wrote that masturbation was dangerous. She stated: “In my personal experience as a trained nurse while attending persons afflicted with various and often revolting diseases, no matter what their ailments, I never found any one so repulsive as the chronic masturbator. It would not be difficult to fill page upon page of heart-rending confessions made by young girls, whose lives were blighted by this pernicious habit, always begun so innocently.”[81] She believed that women had the ability to control their sexual impulses, and should utilize that control to avoid sex outside of relationships marked by “confidence and respect.” She believed that exercising such control would lead to the “strongest and most sacred passion.”

The generation of women that started third wave feminism were stay at home mothers. If their man did the housework and child care, just as they demand today, they would literally have nothing to do, be landed gentry, and that’s what third wave feminism was really striving for since the women had everything in the world and…automated.

But even one hundred years ago women realized their power came in controlling who mates with who and when a child results.

That is why even women who hate abortion don’t question it and why, despite married women demanding help from daddy, single women want nothing to do with their “baby daddy”.

Here is a new article about how women should control embryo’s that she made with a contract that protected him in case he didn’t want them implanted.

In this article an idiot male let her have (legally his/her’s) babies after she signed a paper saying that he doesn’t have to pay child support so he could save a few hundred dollars in storage fees.

Sorry Charlie, you can’t sign away child support. If she get’s down on her luck or if the next chick is poor, then she will receive welfare and this idiot will have a paper trail leading right to his testicles.

He will have to re-imburse the state. Don’t like it…poor poopies, it’s old settled case law.

She writes:

Regaining power over my ability to decide to have children was a huge victory for me – but it need not have been. It’s seemingly become standard for couples to agree to equal rights over their embryos and, as Sofia Vergara’s ex demonstrated in the pages of the New York Times, it’s increasingly common for those equal rights to be wielded as a weapon of control, particularly against women. Had I been asked to think through both what seemed fair to him and what that fairness might cost me, I might’ve had one less thing to worry about while trying to save my own life.

So she openly states that she doesn’t want to have to think about “what seemed fair to him”.

Women have children. They have no intention nor will they ever “share custody”, they want baby sitters but when their done needing your help…forget about you children.

If you really really want children STOP IT.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/#post-48153 <![CDATA[Reply To: You want children? New law: You have no parental rights anymore]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/#post-48153 Mon, 04 May 2015 18:43:12 +0000 Smacktalk73 As I’ve gotten older, I’ve started to recognize how backwards we are in our views of sexuality.  Notice how women spend tons of time making themselves look F~~~ABLE?   Males spend virtually no time on this compared do females.  And yet women also complain about being seen as sex objects.

The conflict here is resolved when you realize that once a woman has f~~~ed a man, she has all the power — but until she has f~~~ed the man she WANTS to f~~~ she’s vulnerable to being f~~~ed and impregnated by others.

So women are trying as hard as they can to seem f~~~able, for the guy they WANT to f~~~, but they’re also desperately using a stick to slap away all the other guys that are getting roped in by the signals they broadcast.

Males are worked in to a sexual frenzy by all these women walking around dressed like they are ready to f~~~ you at any second.  So all we think about is GETTING sex.  We don’t think about the consequences.

Females on the other hand are interested in sex, and know that once the consequences come around, as long as they’ve had sex with the guy they want, they are in TOTAL control.  They have the guy by the b~~~~.

The truth is, if women DIDN’T spend so much time trying to look sexy, males would be gone.  We’d be completely uninterested in f~~~ing, compared to women.

Now, when I see women walking down the street, primped out with a hour’s worth of makeup and hair, ass and t~~~ on display wiggling around, I think “now there’s a woman trying DESPERATELY to get f~~~ed by the right guy — and praying the wrong guy doesn’t lose his s~~~ and rape her.”

Women are playing with fire here, but all risk ends when sex happens.  If it’s the right guy, he’s snared.  If it’s the wrong guy, f~~~ it she just goes and has an abortion.

It’s men who should be RUNNING from sex.  The only thing that keeps us involved in the sex game is how much women play it up, constantly trying to keep sex on our minds.  If we thought about how HORRIBLE what comes after sex is from males, we’d all be getting vasectomies right now, at the very least.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/#post-48155 <![CDATA[Reply To: You want children? New law: You have no parental rights anymore]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/#post-48155 Mon, 04 May 2015 18:58:23 +0000 I have my vas done 8 years ago.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/#post-48193 <![CDATA[Reply To: You want children? New law: You have no parental rights anymore]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/you-want-children-new-law-you-have-no-parental-rights-anymore/#post-48193 Mon, 04 May 2015 21:03:27 +0000 sidecar

From Margaret Sanger: Born 1879

1879

Again: 1879

And yet even here some people still cling to the lie that feminism was ever about equality.

]]>