My first comment:
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/oh-look-rok-is-telling-us-what-to-do-again/page/2/#post-249893
Second Comment:
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/oh-look-rok-is-telling-us-what-to-do-again/page/2/#post-249972
Ban:
Corey
I said you could do whatever you want and that this article is not for you, but you continue whine here. Banned.

Thin skinned PUA… HA!

What is this person talking about? I’ve never seen such criticism in the MGTOW community (not in this forum or anywhere else). Anytime someone pays off debt, gets a college degree, gets a pay raise/promotion at work, or saves up enough money to get sports car, I applaud them! Maybe there’s some bad websites out there in cyberspace, but as far as I can see, we encourage each other to work hard and enjoy the fruits of our labor.

They had a strict policy. If you respond to a female in the comments, you will be banned. I respected this, knew and understood it, but one day, I schooled a bitch in the comments and realized I shouldn’t have done that. So I came forward and admitted that I was now facing being banned.

One of the admins told me they won’t ban me because:
1. I knew I f~~~ed up and was forthright about it.
and
2. He said my input there was highly valued.

Then our site opened and obviously I stopped participating over there, until Fatt Horny dug into MGTOW with that s~~~ty piece some 15 months later, so I went over there and reminded them who they were talking about. Confronting them directly. (paraphrasing) “Hey remember me? I’m the commenter you up-voted a f~~~-hundred times and didn’t even ban when you should have. And now THIS??? You don’t know what you’re talking about.”

Banned me that day. And there you have it.

You can’t respond to women when the PUA lifestyle revolves around game & women? That seems kind of odd.

If you respond to a female in the comments, you will be banned.

Dafuq

You can’t respond to women when the PUA lifestyle revolves around game & women? That seems kind of odd.

Interesting way to put it. And it is odd. But they are clearly trying to outrage women, to get the visits and clicks. Take for example the ROK viral article that went ballistic, entitled “Girls with short hair are damaged”.

If you want to talk about how modern women are “damaged”, you could do it 100 other ways. For example, they are “damaged” by too much Walt Disney during early development. Have you seen Disney’s “Enchanted”. Holy s~~~. The 6 year old girl in it hasn’t even dated or kissed a boy yet …..and she’s already got her head filled with nonsense she tells the princess, like “Guys only want one thing.” When the Princess asks “what’s that?”, she says “I dont know. Nobody will tell me”.

This is for an audience of little girls all across America. By the time they are 7 they have all kinds of stupid s~~~ pumped into their heads. And they tell each other the same s~~~ without even knowing what they are saying!!!

That’s “damaging” to little girls and baby women.

But ROK writes “girls with short hair are damaged” as if their screwed up mentalities hinge on getting a boy cut – or implying they got a boy cut because they are “damaged” . Naturally women with short hair all over the internet are going to going to ape s~~~, which is exactly what ROK wanted.

I don’t find short hair attractive on women either, but in that case, you say “I prefer women with long hair”. But they intentionally say “girls with short hair are damaged” to generate an emotional reaction from women with short hair.

That’s why they publish so many articles that start with:

“10 reasons to ….”
“6 ways to….”
“18 reasons why….”

That’s the s~~~ women love to read. “6 ways to please your man other than laying there like a futon”. And honestly, who gives a f~~~ if socks are on or off? It’s pathetic. But that’s the s~~~ women read in women’s interest magazines.

The ONE THING women’s magazines never tell women:
“If you want to please your man. Ask HIM what he likes. And when he answers … DO IT”

Now that’s some decent useful advice for women. But instead, they list off 10 totally stupid reasons that don’t even solve their problems.

The ROK stuff like that isn’t written for men.
It’s written to outrage women.

… and then they pretend women are not permitted to comment?
Yeah OK whatever. They can just STFU about MGTOW.
They can get their cheap clicks and emotional outbursts from women.

ROK’s is about PUA lifestyle, at least that’s the gist of it I have taken away from reading some of it.

Having taken a few steps back to see the overall picture (like I always do) after having read some of it as well I strongly tend to agree with your observation, chir.

And therefore like I said before: We are (or at least should be) beyond PUA’s lifestyle and thus beyond ROK’s attitudes, whatever they may say or postulate about us.

Now let me quickly elaborate this a bit further here: I am not saying we are below or above ROK but beyond which wants to simply mean “off their tracks”, and well so be it.

Do feel free to comment in there every now and again if you please and/or as long as you are “allowed to”, but if you get banned for this from there, who cares, gents..? Then just leave them alone in their own “peace” instead of keeping to go back and trying to defend your mgtow views or similar, that’ll be just pointless.

In other words at that point let it go, we do have our great forum right here after all…

Women love players, because they realize, they still matter.

I can’t really comprehend ROK. They don’t like us, because we’ve staked their sacred golden vagina out on a pole and exposed it to the World.