Now, a woman would never give this reason for objecting to a prenup, so what reasons do they give?

Reason 1. Sob!

Reason 2. Sniff!

Reason 3. Snotbubble!

I think the subtitle sums it up best… “When I got married as a penniless 24-year-old, I never imagined I’d outearn my husband or how that would affect me financially, especially when we got divorced.”

Why would you think that you would need a prenup if you were going to marry me? Sob! If you loved me then you would know that I’m not that kind of woman. Sniff! I’m not after you for your money. Snotbubble! Reason 1. Sob! Reason 2. Sniff! Reason 3. Snotbubble!

Oh god …. I’m sorry Soldier-Medic … I didn’t mean the pre nup ….. my mother put me up to it.

Don’t cry ….. we won’t do it ok.

I love you Soldier-Medic …. I really do 😂

1. They are almost always coercive

2. They lack consideration

3. The people entering into them have no idea what marriage is

4. There is often a silent party to the prenup who is controlling the process

5. The attorneys pushing prenuptial agreements for first marriages have no sensitivity to the destruction they cause

6. Prenuptial agreements usually lack minimum estate distribution if the marriage is ongoing at the time of the death of a party

7. They create a lifetime of corrosive memories

8. They make the less-moneyed party make legal representations that are simply not the truth

9. They are always unfair

10. They show a disregard of the law

But it isn’t even the fact that I had to give him half that I find so egregious. It’s the alimony he demanded I pay him on top of it that makes me very, very angry—like scream-really-loud, get-drunk, and eat-gratuitous-carbohydrates angry. On the first day of every month, I have to write him a mother^#%*ing check

Welcome to equality sweetheart. Don’t you just love it? Funny how she neglects to mention how unfair this has been to men over the years, only when it affects HER in the negative does it suddenly become a travesty.

You sure she’s a lawyer, not a comedienne?

they marry men in order to extract what he can provide during and after the marriage. A marriage certificate is essentially a legally binding contract that grants her access to his resources. Prenups take away, or mitigate, this power and control over his resources.

And they use their ultimate measure of manipulation, they use the word “LOVE”.

The word LOVE is a red flag.

Actions are what prove LOVE, not saying it.

And real LOVE does not include resource extraction or social prostitution.

From a female lawyer: Link
1. They are almost always coercive
2. They lack consideration
3. The people entering into them have no idea what marriage is
4. There is often a silent party to the prenup who is controlling the process
5. The attorneys pushing prenuptial agreements for first marriages have no sensitivity to the destruction they cause
6. Prenuptial agreements usually lack minimum estate distribution if the marriage is ongoing at the time of the death of a party
7. They create a lifetime of corrosive memories
8. They make the less-moneyed party make legal representations that are simply not the truth
9. They are always unfair
10. They show a disregard of the law

Sounds to me like Ms. Female Lawyer is talking about the marriage contract itself, not pre-nups.