Now most women who had replied said that the husband did a mistake and he should be taught a lesson. Also there is this woman who went to an extent and said that she works in the same company (not same place) where the husband works and if the OP wanted she can use her influence to kick him out or frame him so he looses his job. Obviously the reply was yes and every member of the forum endorsed it and also applauded the OP for being a strong women.

Also there is this other woman who also said that he should be taught some strong lessons besides kicking him out of the company, which is to get a divorce where he has to pay some hefty compensation or file a fake police complaint. Again everybody accepted it. Some also said that society and law always empathize for women more even if she is wrong, so go ahead with the divorce.

According to women they are strong, independent and don’t need man’s money. But from above we can clearly see that women wants to destroy men financially, which means she is there for money and once she can’t get her hand on it or use it, she try things to destroy him financially. This also clearly proves that most women get married for money, security and not for love, even the OP mentioned that she had a bad past life and marriage was her biggest hope of light, which means she married him so that she can cling on to him and enjoy all benefits and fulfill her dreams without moving her ass.

If she’s a independent and strong woman, what she should have done was to move out of the marriage, get a job, stand on her feet and then show the world that she’s independent. But here she wanted to kick him out of his job and drain him financially.

But say if the roles were reversed and if wife says that she had no compatibility and wanted to end the marriage.., Then the only option the guy would have was to move out without any complaints and that is what society expects too, otherwise he would have been called a coward if he tried same things like the woman did above.

1.  All women have an ulterior unstated agenda focused on financial gain.

2. “Love” (read loyalty) has no significance to a woman unless the dialogue is focused on YOUR love and loyalty fulfilling HER needs.

3.  YOUR NEEDS aren’t even a blip on HER radar….ever.

4.  When she perceives the slightest hint that you are not 110% focused on #2, then she pulls out all the stops to destroy you like a bratty child fries ants on a hot sunny day with a magnifying glass.

5.  Our social paradigm and the legal system fully supports and rewards HER rationale for divorce no matter how outrageous and childish they may be.

6.  YOUR outcome in divorce has two outcomes;  YOU LOSE EVERYTHING MATERIALLLY and YOU FEEL LIKE YOU’VE LOST YOUR SOUL.

I speak as the voice of experience here but I am certainly far from unique.  I am the norm in these circumstances.  For anyone thinking of marriage, learn from me and many others who have been here.  Learn from the female narrative the OP posted above.  Then ask yourself if your cupcake is really a NAWALT.

According to women they are strong, independent and don’t need man’s money. 

I’ve been with a few of those women, but they always turned out to be financial parasites.

One specifically like to thing of herself as a strong and independent woman that did not need a man’s money. On some level that was true: she did not need my money, directly. It was like, I was not paying her every time we had sex. However, for the entire year and half period of time she lived at my house (I had a mortgage)  she didn’t pay any rent and did not pay anything in terms of utilities. Her philosophy regarding that in her own words was ‘It’s a given that you need somewhere to live and you would be living here even if we were not together’. So basically I was supposed to be grateful that she was co-habituating with me at my house. I also paid for every vacation that we went on and spoiled her financially with other things. That was my pre-MGTOW era.

But while I was covering all of the boring, normal bills. She maxed out her IRA for both calendar years that we were together, put 20% of her income in her 401k, bought a new car and had access to a trust fund her grandfather left her that had $430,000 in it. But her fundamental business model when in a relationship was that a man was ‘supposed to take good care of me.’

If the sex wasn’t so phenomenal, I would have got out of that situation way sooner.

And as far as her claiming to be independent and not needing a man’s money: She feeds parasitically off of every guy she is with and still gets money from other men 01: her father gives her $12,000 a year and he paid for her college degree, 02: grandfather’s trust fund, 03: got a pile of cash from her ex-husband when the house from that marriage was sold, 04: etc, etc, etc. – In the end, every aspect of her existence is based exclusively on money that she has got and continues to get from men.

Some women are so pathologically delusional that they actual believe their own warped and twisted facades of what they portray themselves to be.