We love women so much that we consider ourselves not worthy of their kindness and affection.

We sacrifice our own happiness and small pleasures of a woman’s divine company so that the more worthy men among us can enjoy their companionship.

We love women a little too much here to be honest.

Her eye is CONSTANTLY fixed on her own object of selfish desire, on account of which she is submissive to her husband. Otherwise she is disobedient and destructive.

Her face is cheerful, but her mind is unclean.

As Men, we understand something you don’t. Violence is not how you deal with women. It doesn’t even hurt them.
Rhianna kept going back for MORE for Christ’s sake. It doesn’t teach them a goddam thing!

You best let her destroy herself from the INSIDE.

See … men understand force EXPLICITLY:
We use fists, bombs, guns, knives etc. to neutralize a threat.

Women understand force IMPLICITLY:
They use manipulation, nagging, backstabbing, ostracizing from a group.

When you use “force” (as you suggest) against a woman…..you don’t accomplish anything. You don’t win that way. You’re not beating her at her own game. You’re not even hurting her. All you’re doing is satisfying her core belief system that men are bad. That would SATISFY her. Because as long as you’re beating her, you’re still *paying* attention to her. That’s what she wants! She will even come back for more(!) – because nothing is more devastating to her than being ignored.

Nothing is more devastating to her than being ignored.

You don’t understand that s~~~ because you’re still stuck in the f~~~ing stone age.
Way too last century and late to the party, pal.

It’s true women need more training than a killer whale and more discipline than a sack of lard. They don’t even understand what “men only” means. But you would have to beat a sack of lard pretty heavily in order to get meringue. And in case you missed that, meringue is made from eggs whites. So no matter how heavily you beat lard, you will never get meringue.

No. You let her destroy herself – from the INSIDE.
Bruises heal. But abandonment issues are forever.

Less effort than beating her. More effective results.

This guy has exactly the right idea:

—

His only mistake was coming home again. She actually believed she is “teaching him a lesson” and is proud of her behavior! Instead of letting her drive him crazy with her incessant nagging, bitching (she says it herself)….. you LEAVE HER there to do all the work and drive HERSELF crazy – all alone. And the beauty of it is, it takes ZERO effort from you. Attention is a woman’s lifeblood. Don’t give her any, and she will eventually die that slow and painful death you were talking about. Like an exhausted fly on a window sill that kept bashing it’s own stupid head against the glass – over and over again, because it was too f~~~ing stupid to find another open window.

That’s MGTOW, baby. Man wins by doing NOTHING.
You could afford to learn a few things.

Her man tried to get even by teaching her a lesson in “equality”.
Like “equal treatment for women”….

—

But that satisfies her. It turns her on. You become the violent destructive asshole that she cultivated ON PURPOSE.
And now she is satisfied, because nothing is more devastating to her than being ignored.
Never, never, satisfy a bitch with more of your attention.
… unless you plan on training her to be even BIGGER bitch.

….

Nothing is more devastating to her than being ignored.

Use that to your advantage.

Now leave.

Earlier women were STRICTLY not allowed to be free and it was considered the worst thing in the world as women were known to be the MOST dangerous creatures.

Citation needed. NON-FEMINIST citation needed.

webster wrote:

Men cannot enjoy the inventions of their superior sex, because the women have invaded our good world and are getting us left and right.

Well, there is a solution for that, is called GO YOUR OWN WAY….

webster wrote:

Women have always been considered the root of all evil by almost all cultures worldwide since the beginning of time.

Again, NON-FEMINIST citation needed.

webster wrote:

Even Hitler has not killed nearly as many men. Millions and billions die at the hands of women and their tricks.

Can I call Femenatzi on this one? I think this is pretty much the DICTIONARY DEFINITION of femenatzi (if the term had a dictionary definition).

webster wrote:

Not only are women to be burned at the stake and stoned to death, in some parts they should even be burned after the husband’s death because it was known that their bad karma killed men.

And there is where I press the T~~~ button. Only a freaking female/feminist would think men think that way.

F~~~ off troll.