Anthony Kiedis, 52, sparks rumours of a split from 22-year-old girlfriend Wanessa Milhomem as he cosies up to a pretty young blonde

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3088756/Anthony-Kiedis-52-sparks-rumours-split-22-year-old-girlfriend-Wanessa-Milhomem-cozies-mystery-young-blonde.html#ixzz3agyU0AAm
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3088756/Anthony-Kiedis-52-sparks-rumours-split-22-year-old-girlfriend-Wanessa-Milhomem-cozies-mystery-young-blonde.html

Yeah, 50’s single, cool, fun. MGTOW are just a bunch of sad losers who can’t get a date.

Attractiveness (Att) = Money*Fame/Age*Looks.

So we have Att = (M*F*/Age*L) .

When Att > 1 he’s f~~~able.

Age in and alone is irrelevant.

M*F / A*L = Att. If Att is greater than 1 then you have the green light to have sex with them. Meaning M*F > A*L. Dividing by  F on both sides and then dividing by A on both sides yields (M/A) >(L/F). Consider the left hand side. Call it S=M/A. This S variable is large if and only if the money you make is very large and your age is small. S is small if and only if your age is large or you’re old as hell and your monetary worth is small. This implies that S is some variant of a success coefficient as it shows that the younger you are and the more money you have the more of a “success” you are in their eyes. So

success (S) = money /age

Now look at the right hand side of the equation. Call it W = L/F. This W variable is large when you have lots of good looks or physical attractiveness and little fame/recognition. W is small precisely when you have little looks and lots of fame. People are famous for their money, their character, their accomplishments, or their looks in conjunction with money like acting professions. Those with little looks who work very hard to be famous or achieve recognition in this field are willing to do whatever it takes to be successful and have resources for themselves which tells a woman they are workhorses  in need of someone they can spend money on. We call the inverse of W the workhorse coefficient so

workhorse coeff. (W.c.) = 1/W

So by substitution Success (S)*Workhorse coeff.(Wc) > 1. If S and Wc are very high it is more likely to be greater than 1 so you are maritable material if not long term relationship material. women don’t want a man who is successful and works hard. They want a man who will be successful and work hard FOR THEM. Look at the math. I’m a 22 year old design engineering student and I’ve figured this out without being burned this far in life. Women are leeches and its sooooo obvious. Thanks to HR pufnstuf for his mathematical conjecture. It was illuminating .

Yo I had to comment on this. This formula though intended to be more of a jest than anything serious has hidden nuggets of truth I don’t think you realize. Your equation states that if the Att>1 you’re screwable. I would argue that not only are you screwable, you become worth their time and emotional investment, I.e. Long term relationship status. Consider a rearrangement of your equation … M*F / A*L = Att. If Att is greater than 1 then you have the green light to have sex with them. Meaning M*F > A*L. Dividing by F on both sides and then dividing by A on both sides yields (M/A) >(L/F). Consider the left hand side. Call it S=M/A. This S variable is large if and only if the money you make is very large and your age is small. S is small if and only if your age is large or you’re old as hell and your monetary worth is small. This implies that S is some variant of a success coefficient as it shows that the younger you are and the more money you have the more of a “success” you are in their eyes. So success (S) = money /age Now look at the right hand side of the equation. Call it W = L/F. This W variable is large when you have lots of good looks or physical attractiveness and little fame/recognition. W is small precisely when you have little looks and lots of fame. People are famous for their money, their character, their accomplishments, or their looks in conjunction with money like acting professions. Those with little looks who work very hard to be famous or achieve recognition in this field are willing to do whatever it takes to be successful and have resources for themselves which tells a woman they are workhorses in need of someone they can spend money on. We call the inverse of W the workhorse coefficient so workhorse coeff. (W.c.) = 1/W So by substitution Success (S)*Workhorse coeff.(Wc) > 1. If S and Wc are very high it is more likely to be greater than 1 so you are maritable material if not long term relationship material. women don’t want a man who is successful and works hard. They want a man who will be successful and work hard FOR THEM. Look at the math. I’m a 22 year old design engineering student and I’ve figured this out without being burned this far in life. Women are leeches and its sooooo obvious. Thanks to HR pufnstuf for his mathematical conjecture. It was illuminating .

Hahaha f~~~ me hahaha you’re the mgtow Einstein hahaha

My heads hurting 😃

Loved their music since the 90s, when I was a young brat, another MGTOW band would probably be Rammstein, at least the song, Du Hast, is pretty much a man ditching his woman for his pals/life, and another song Rosenrot, pretty much displays how beautiful women are insane and cruel in their own ways, and that men are willing to kill others and themselves for them.

Californication man, He’s it. Loved their music since the 90s, when I was a young brat, another MGTOW band would probably be Rammstein, at least the song, Du Hast, is pretty much a man ditching his woman for his pals/life, and another song Rosenrot, pretty much displays how beautiful women are insane and cruel in their own ways, and that men are willing to kill others and themselves for them.

Rammstein are always on my head when working out. Deffo mgtow band. Also some Korn helps ☺

Fermat271 Wrote: This formula though intended to be more of a jest than anything serious has hidden nuggets of truth I don’t think you realize.

I have read HRP’s previous post involving math logic and I would give (two to one) odds (one time only) that he does realize those nuggets of truth are there…he has drawn a map and put an X to mark the spot… having money trumps every other part of the equation.. ie.  With enough money nothing else matters..looks, workhorse variables, fame or status, age, sexual prowess or anything else you may toss into the math problem that is sexual market value…(Daddy’s credit card syndrome)