More importantly, so long as there are no negative repercussions to women for false accusations it’s only going to get worse.  There is literally no down side for them to make false rape accusations.

I’m willing to bet it’s north of 20% of rape allegations are false.

Think, I read somewhere it was between 25-40% or something.

Scary stuff, this is something that completely ruins a man’s life.

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1o74n7/facts_and_statistics_about_false_rape_claims_a/

Old but interesting.

That may have a lot to do with the fact that I do not depend on using alcohol, drugs or lies to pry a female’s clothing off like so many men that I have known. While there may be females out there who accuse men of rape just for the sport of it, I suspect most of them do it because they feel cheated in some way… either coerced into sex or misled with promises or implications that turned out to be false.

This is not to say that you can be 100% free from rape charges if you are honest and direct and use natural charm to bed females, just that you can substantially lower your risks of catching a charge (not to mention VD) if you limit yourself to only having sex with sober females.

Which leads me to this… what percentage of initial sexual encounters do you guys think occur between two completely sober people? I’ve met people who have NEVER had sex sober or with a sober partner. To me this is just begging for trouble. Getting females drunk and high so you can f~~~ them is the risk equivalent of said female showing up in a miniskirt with no panties and accepting your drinks and drugs. You may think she’s the stupid mark, but you’re setting yourself up for worse. Being raped can become a badge of feminist proof and honor… but being branded a sex offender will ruin your life.

Gentlemen, you have to be careful with yourselves out there… if you’re trawling bars and music events for drunk and high chicks to bang, I won’t have much sympathy when you end up with a felony rape charge and herpes.

Watch this video, its from this men’s right activist in Delhi who is like an Indian version of Karen Straughan.

Also recently during Obama’s visit to India on the celebration of India’s Republic Day a bunch of feminazis decided to use that opportunity of free publicity to push their political agenda and did a programme called Rape-Public Day.
Watch this response video made by this guy who just hammered this extremely stupid feminist bitch.

Women think that they somehow *OWN* rape — as though rape itself were a wedding and no man could have an opinion about it. But I am taking back rape like I took back the vote. It’s a MAN thing and women aren’t allowed to have an opinion on it. Rape is one of the most underreported crimes in the world. That’s because women don’t really give a sh*t about it. I sat on my seatbelt one time. It sucked and I was sore for a bit, but I cranked some metal all the way to work and by the time I got there, I didn’t give a sh*t. That’s basically the same as women and rape. They just need an extra long shower.

Only 16% of rapes and sexual assaults are reported to the police. If women love to hate rape so much, then why do they constantly miss the opportunity to do something about it? Because they’re women. If rolling her eyes doesn’t fix the problem, it’s passed to the nearest man. More men are raped every year than women. When I decided that, I was initially shocked at the statistics, which indicated the opposite: that I was wrong.

Prison rape statistics put the annual number of prisoner rape at approximately 7,000 a year. The average number of women who are “sexually assaulted” every year is 200,780.

That’s a BIG fcuking difference. Like a wedding or menopause, it looks like women should own rape and be able to say whatever they want about it. However, like usual when dealing with women, I knew there was some bullsh*t afoot with that staggering 200,000.

When I forced my man-probe of investigation into this data, I discovered that “sexual assault” is not the same as rape. Apparently women aren’t going by the long-established and very manly Clinton definition of “sexual” when they define “assault”. If it didn’t fit, you must acquit.

64,080 of sexual assaults involve actual “rape” / penetration / intercourse. And a staggeringly low 26% of these “rapes” were committed by an actual stranger.

Women raped the true meaning of the word “rape”.

A roommate who drinks all your beer isn’t a thief, he’s just a dick. A younger brother who burns your toys isn’t an arsonist, he’s just a dick. A guy who f~~~s a drunk naked chick who passed out in his bed isn’t a rapist, he’s just a dick. Get over it. And here is proof 100% of those drunks sluts are LYING.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-436592/Drug-rape-myth-exposed-study-reveals-binge-drinking-blame.html

Personally, I have always known date rape victims are lying. Of course “personally” is the worst way to be right about anything. “Personally” is subjective and emotional. It is prone to error and bias. “Personally” is womanly. So instead of saying “personally” , because I am a MAN, lets prove it SCIENTIFICALLY.

Recently, it was stated that in the UK, Rohypnol has never ever been used in a case of sexual misconduct. I say sexual misconduct because “date rape” is a crass and manipulative word. I refused to use it from now on. It rapes the true meaning of the word “rape”. Someone performed a study anyway, and here are the results of that study in the form of a boot straight up the ass of every woman who is culturally prejudiced against the way women are treated in the Middle East.

Over 12 months, and out of 75 patients who claimed to be “victims” of sexual misconduct and drink tampering with Rohypnol, GHB, or ketamine, 0% were found to have it in their system. ZERO. F~~~ING. PERCENT. In an unsurprising twist, 100% of these sluts were found to be drunk out of their trees. And she did that to herself.

• 55% of “rape victims” had a blood alcohol content of twice the legal driving limit.
• 25% of “rape victims” were three times over the limit.
• 20% of “rape victims” tested positive for amphetamines.

In the case of women, you’ve also got a 20% chance of being on amphetamines. I’m no vagina doctor, but I’m pretty sure they don’t put amphetamines in the birth control pills that none of these whores were taking when they hit Ladies Night like a drunken tornado of abandonment issues.

•••••

26% of 64,000 rape victims is 16,640 women.
Getting your boob grabbed on the subway isn’t rape.

A woman might think these pruning measures should be applied to my prison man-rape statistics, but if anything, prison rape is probably more underreported than regular rape.

I have something I call the Treasure Map of Truth that I use when dealing with women. Step one is determining what women actually mean with a word like “sexually”. They never mean what you think they mean. Step two means figuring out how much of it was her fault. It’s usually very high. In this case, 74%. And step three is see where she’s lying her f~~~ing ass off.

Less than half of accused rapists are convicted. 54% are NOT (to be mancise). That means any man accused of and arrested for rape is likely to not have done sh*t.

http://www.mgtow.com/video/false-rape-thwarted-by-police-camera/

And of course there are the “convicted” ones did NOT rape anyone either.

If more than 54% of rapes didn’t actually happen, then that reported 16,640 goes down to 7,654.

If I was a woman, that’s where I would stop. 7,654 women and 6,908 men are raped every year and it looks like women barely squeaked out a majority on this one. That doesn’t mean it’s theirs, but it does make me wrong, which I’m much more concerned about.

By all conservative estimates, 10% of non-prison rape victims are male. That means the final rape statistics for any given year are 6,908 men and 6,889 women.

Just: “one in 3 women are raped”.

… and they call themselves “smart”. Permitting women to speak about “rape” is like watch a toddler playing with a loaded gun.

Horrifying.

A rape accusation is essentially a weapon.  Accusing a man publicly of rape is akin to shooting him.  His life will never be the same. A good portion of people will never believe he is innocent, even if he is acquitted.

Now, I would NEVER say a woman can’t have a gun to protect herself.  And I would NEVER say a woman can’t accuse a man of rape.

But I would also NEVER say that if a woman shoots a man, and says it was to protect herself, we can’t question her motives and the justice of her actions.   Likewise, if a woman accuses a man of rape, I would NEVER say we can’t question her motives and the justice of her actions.

That’s the bottom line — many women want the weapon of rape accusation to be available, but want a total lack of accountability for it.

If someone said “I want to be allowed to shoot people, and I don’t want you to be able to question my decision, because that might discourage me from shooting people” we would think they were F~~~ING CRAZY.

But women can say “I want to be able to accuse men of rape, and I don’t want you to be able to question my accusation, because that might discourage me from accusing men at all.”

Same thing. F~~~ing crazy.

As an experiment I asked a large group of women if they had ever been raped.
Even when they were not raped, NONE of them just said “no” I’ve never been raped.

THEY ALL tried to think of a way to demonize a man:

• “Well I sat on Santa’s lap one time and Im pretty sure he had a boner! LOL!”
OK so that’s a no. So why didn’t you just say NO???

• “Well I have an uncle who smiles at me alot. I think he’s kinda creepy.”
OK so that’s a no. So why didn’t you just say NO???

• “Well my prom date really wanted to have sex with me.”
OK so that’s also a no. So why didn’t you just say NO???

And the same f~~~ing bitches will buy, read and go watch 50 shades of grey on VALENTINE’S DAY and take their babies to see it.

…. and they want “respect”.