In the event that you ever had any illusions about feminism being about ‘equality’, take a quick look at this article about comments made recently by Female American Supreme Court Judge Ruth Ginsburg. For those who are not American and may not be familiar with our system here, the American Supreme Court is a panel of nine judges who preside over the court that has final authority over what is, and is not, consistent with the American Constitution (the document written by the founders of our country that delineates how power is distributed to whom, and on what terms within our government). The original intended aim of that document was to distribute legal power of government essentially equally between the president (executive branch), the congress (legislative branch) and the courts (judicial branch). The Supreme Court is the ultimate power within that judicial branch. Among their powers is the ability to decide what civil rights of the citizenry are, and to whom and on what terms they are protected. What follows below is a cut and paste of the article. Pay particular attention to that last line:

The 81-year-old Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told law students at Georgetown University this week that she believes there will be “enough” women on the Supreme Court when “there are nine” justices.
“People ask me sometimes when do you think it will be enough? When will there be enough women on the court? And my answer is when there are nine,” she said.
Mobile_Inline
Ginsburg is currently one of three women sitting on the United States Supreme Court. Sandra Day O’Connor was the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court in 1981 by President Ronald Reagan. Ginsburg became the second female justice on the court when President Bill Clinton appointed her in 1993.
She told the crowd of Georgetown students about the challenges of finding a job in the legal profession as a woman in the early days of her career.
“Most judges wouldn’t hire women,” she explained. “And the excuse for not hiring women in the Criminal Division was they have to deal with all these tough types, and women aren’t up to that. And I was amazed. I said, have you seen the lawyers at legal aid who are representing these tough types? They’re all women.”

Ginsburg revealed that if she had her choice of another career profession, she would want to be a “great diva.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/02/07/ruth-bader-ginsburg-wants-an-all-female-supreme-court-video/

With all the women that will be in charge, there will be continual conflict between groups.  Men will be run by their animal passions, because they will follow the example of their leaders, which will be women.  Men will continually clash with each other because of their inability to control themselves.  Mass violence will eventually take place and become the norm.  The gangs will need someone to supply them.  In turn the corruption will keep the women in power.

If women are to be in control it can only be in lower and mid levels of government.  Those who are really in control would have to be men, since women are not able to control themselves.  So if one day we wake up with a woman as president, I think we can safely assume that in the grand scheme of things, the national government is subject to some higher level of government that we do not know about.

Power is the grandest illusion of them all.

It is about equality for feminists.  Equality through destruction.

Imagine the feminist controlled media uproar if say, Clarence Thomas, said the inverse.  Ruth, Your Honoress Highest Maximus C~~~rix, I think it’s time you resign from your post as your creeping senility obviously is beginning to rot your feeble mind.

I f~~~ing hate double standards.

Here in Canada, the head of the Supreme Court is the Right Honourable Madame Chief Justice McLachlin:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverley_McLachlin

Women have also held the position of Governor General, such as the Right Honourable Jeanne Sauve:

http://archive.gg.ca/gg/fgg/bios/01/sauve_e.asp

She also had the distinction of having been the first woman Speaker of the House of Commons.  Other women have been Governor General but their terms were, in my opinion, less than stellar.

“And I was amazed. I said, have you seen the lawyers at legal aid who are representing these tough types? They’re all women.”

The reason they are women is because the legal aid lawyers are generally entry level and the least competent, and their employer, the state, is obligated to fill quotas.