NEVER GET MARRIED IN THIS CULTURE

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/are-new-dating-apps-killing-monogamy-or-has-it-always-been-dead/2015/05/26/485f07ec-03e8-11e5-8bda-c7b4e9a8f7ac_story.html?tid=sm_tw

“In 2010, Jessie approached her husband with an idea she called “ethical non-monogamy.” They would stay together as each other’s primary, lifelong partners, but they wouldn’t rule out other relationships — as long as they happened openly. Jessie has shown her husband her profile on several dating sites, including Open Minded. When she returns from her weekly date with one of her four extramarital partners, she tells him as much, or as little, as he likes.”

NEVER GET MARRIED IN THIS CULTURE

 You convinced me!

We’re are close …. very close …

Throw me another beer ☺

If she wants back on the carousel, ride away sister. However be f~~~ing honest, have some integrity, set the man free financially and without obligations, and own her choice. Oh and don’t be surprised when the is no “good” man available for her when the ride ends. Trash with money is still trash

Throw me another beer ☺

here’s a 6 pack and popcorn ILiveAgain

When you lose your credibility, it’s supposed to be hard to get it back. But men have been giving liberal feminists a pass constantly. No matter how many times their lies are debunked, men are quick to believe these women the next time they lie. This is why there is never any progress, as long as we always go back to a starting point of accepting whatever women say and then working to debunk it, we are trapped in an endless loop.

The men of the west have become pathetic losers. I wonder what  Muslim man would do if his wife even suggested such a thing. And I wonder if Muslim men would even be willing to commit adultery with a 50+ year old woman as in the article.

The article likes to claim we are returning to our roots. My Christian knowledge of history tells me we would stone adulterers. Of course feminists like to pick and choose. They like to pick from the decline stage of civilizations and insist we must act that way, with zero punishment or accountability for themselves.

NEVER GET MARRIED

There, this is better.

Durden wrote:

When she returns from her weekly date with one of her four extramarital partners,

I didn’t even opened the link and my eyes are already burning… FOUR extramarital partners?!?! REALLY?

In this climate, I do wonder, why THE F~~~ would ANY MAN get MARRIED? So your wife can openly BANG OTHER DUDES? Mybe I am old fashioned (never thought I would ever say that at 32 years old), but somebody please explain to me, HOW someone can DEVELOP EMOTIONAL BONDS with a woman that is banging 4 OTHER MEN on the f~~~ing SIDE?

Going to the article now… Wish me luck…

“How to Break Free from Monogamy without Destroying Marriage”

More like: “How to get your spineless husband to allow you to go around riding other dicks” lmao

“How to get your hubby to pay for your s~~~ even though he doesn’t even get sex out of you anymore” would also be very suiting

Her first marriage, in her early 20s, had ended after an affair. (Hers.)

Great, We start on an awesome start. We are talking with a woman that had already an affair, and whose husband was not very happy about it, since that relationship ended.

Her second marriage, started shortly thereafter, was “happy — very happy,” but as her boys grew up and moved out and moved on, she was left faintly bored.

That, gentleman, is the main reason why they cheat: boredom. I think she would less bored if she had to actually WORK HER ASS OFF to sustain the f~~~ing house, like HER HUSBAND probably do. What’s wrong with these people? And she was sooo happy with her 2nd husband, that she wanted 4 MORE OTHER C~~~S… Holy crap…

She thought about cheating on her husband of 20 years. She considered bars, parties, a review of the lapses in her mid-20s.

F~~~ing upstanding citizen right there.

Instead, she sat her husband down and told him something that more and more progressive couples are beginning to realize. They loved each other and wanted to stay together — but in the age of Tinder and Ashley Madison and OkCupid, they also both wanted to have other options. Options they knew were just a click away.

I like how all the sudden is THEY. So far, SHE was the one with an itch between her legs. But now, THEY are the ones looking for other partners. Funny how all the guys “desire” were brought up.

“Interesting, introspective, happily married D.C. professional,” reads Jessie’s profile on the new non-monogamous dating site Open Minded. “I’m into building deep and loving relationships that add to the joy and aliveness of being human.”

“I’m into building deep and loving relationships…” with anyone else but my HUSBAND and FATHER OF MY CHILDREN.

Open Minded isn’t quite like Ashley Madison, the unapologetic dating-for-cheaters service that expects a billion-dollar valuation when it launches its impending IPO. It also isn’t quite like mobile hook-up app Tinder, where — according to one recent report — as many as 40 percent of “singles” are secretly . . . not.

I wonder how much of those 40% that are not single on Tinder are women…

Instead, says Brandon Wade, the site’s pragmatic, MIT-educated founder, Open Minded is a new kind of dating site for a newly mainstream lifestyle: one in which couples form very real attachments, just not exclusively with each other. He expects swingers, polysexuals and experimental 20-somethings to use his site. But he guesses that most of his 70,000 users are people like Jessie: Those in committed, conventional relationships, who realize that, statistically speaking, few modern couples stay with a single person their whole lives.

Yes, few modern couples stay with a single person their whole lives because WOMEN are the FIRST to bail the F~~~ OUT…

“If you look at marriage, it developed as a survival strategy and a means of raising kids,” Wade said. “But relationships are no longer a necessary component of life. People have careers and other interests — they can survive without them.”

I actually agree. Specially MEN can survive without them. On this case, WHY THE F~~~ MARRY IN THE FIRST PLACE? In fact, why get into ANY kind of relationship? I am sold, that’s why I am MGTOW. No need to use your services sir, thank you very much. I will f~~~ and dump if the situation present itself, or I shall hire prostitutes or use porn. In the meantime I will better myself. No need for a woman, if she is going to F~~~ AROUND ANYWAY.

That’s not wrong, says Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist and one of the world’s leading relationship researchers. In the caveman days, humans teamed up in non-exclusive pairs to protect their children. Later, as people learned to plant crops and settle in one place, marriage became a way for men to guarantee kids, and for women — who couldn’t push heavy plows or carry loads of crops to market — to eat and keep a roof over their heads.

Soooo, men were worried about the survival of the family, while women, since they couldn’t do anything, were just reaping the benefits? Got it. No wonder is so EASY for FEMALES to f~~~ around. They are not used to have REAL RESPONSIBILITIES…

There’s a long history of married men sleeping around, Fisher said. And the romantic notion that relationships are anything but transactions is relatively recent — as is the social expectation that both people partner for life, to the exclusion of everyone else.

Really now? If men are the ones sleeping around, then explain why WOMEN are the ones INITIATING DIVORCE and looking for OPEN MARRIAGES. If MEN were the ones with such desires, wouldn’t be MEN the ones INITIATING this S~~~?

In fact, given the history and prevalence of non-monogamous relationships throughout cultures, it’s not scientifically correct to say the human species mates or pairs for life. Dogs mate for life. Beavers mate for life. Humans have one-night stands, paramours and a 50 percent divorce rate.

Yes, and from those 50% of divorce, 70% to 90% are INITIATED BY WOMEN! YOU F~~~ING C~~~!!! Holy f….

Fisher dubs it a “dual reproductive strategy”: We’re biologically programmed to form pair-bonds, yes, but some people — many people — are also programmed to seek out variety.

These “many people” are WOMEN.

Just consider the number of married men who have partners outside of their marriage — more than 40 percent in the United States. (That’s down, by the way, from past decades.) Recent research suggests that the network of secondary partners we developed in our cavemen days is still around on Facebook, where we poke and message as many as eight could-be partners in anticipation of rainy days. Even Leviticus tacitly permitted male adultery, provided the act didn’t involve a married lady.

Citation f~~~ing needed. Besides, again, if that was true, then why is WOMEN the ones initiating DIVORCES and SUGGESTING this OPEN RELATIONSHIPS? If MEN were the “horny” ones, shouldn’t we see MEN asking their WIVES for these kind of things?

Also, I am not religious, but taking in consideration all the “faulty logic” so far, I am suspicious about this bible of hers. Even if she is correct, well, I am NOT RELIGIOUS. So I expect loyalty for the sake of the persons involved on the RELATIONSHIP and not to appease GOD.

“Nothing about this is new. It’s as old as the hills,” Fisher said. “What is new is that women are now also being more adulterous — and so people are beginning to be more open about it.”

What is new is that men are starting to see that WOMEN have no bonds to anyone whatsoever. That this is old as the hills, it might be.

Jessie doesn’t like that word. Adultery. It conjures images of lipstick stains and burner phones. Or worse, stonings and scarlet A’s. It also reminds her of her first marriage, which ended after an affair. She hated the lying, the sneaking around. This time, she wanted to be more honest.

I feel so sorry that she doesn’t like the word adultery… because it reminds her of her first marriage. You know, the one where she CHEATED.

In 2010, Jessie approached her husband with an idea she called “ethical non-monogamy.” They would stay together as each other’s primary, lifelong partners, but they wouldn’t rule out other relationships — as long as they happened openly. Jessie has shown her husband her profile on several dating sites, including Open Minded. When she returns from her weekly date with one of her four extramarital partners, she tells him as much, or as little, as he likes.

No word about what HIS relationships looks like. Or how he received this “exciting” news. I wonder how many “extramarital” partners HE has. Probably not as much as hers. Poor bastard.

Publicly, no one knows about this arrangement. (It’s why we have agreed to just use her first name in this story.) Jessie doesn’t plan to tell her children, though she could see it coming up one day. She and her husband still have sex, still go to social functions, still celebrate anniversaries.

Why not? Isn’t that supposed to be normal, old as the hills? Why not let people know? And why would you celebrate ANNIVERSARIES? Does she f~~~ one of her 4 EXTRA MARITAL PARTNERS on this day too? Does HE? Maybe they do a big f~~~ing orgy.

But that whole thing about “the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law . . . so long as he liveth”? To that, Jessie says no thanks.

Then why… the f~~~… did you marry… Oh, yes, money. Really commendable.

More and more women will make this choice or consider it, Fisher expects; it’s in keeping with decades of widespread social change and women’s empowerment. Just 30 years ago, when Jessie was in her 20s, the average woman married at 23 and had her first child within the year. Her mother’s generation didn’t even leave the home. The majority simply raised kids, preached chastity and finger-waved their hair

I see more and more men going Mgtow. And if women are so empowered, they might as well pay their own bills, protect their own self, fight their own wars, and do f~~~ing parthenogenesis, because I am not having a kid with a whore. Like I said, this is the result of pandering women. They need to f~~~ing work and see how having RESPONSIBILITIES is like. Giving them JUST THE RIGHTS, makes them “bored”.

“That’s all sliding away from us,” Fisher said. “We’re shedding all these agricultural traditions . . . [and] returning to the way we were millions of years ago.”

Yeah, the good old days where humans had to FIGHT to SURVIVE. You know, where there were no TECHNOLOGIES or CONVENIENCES for humans. Women can go back to living in caves if they want to, since apparently, their only desire is to F~~~ everything that MOVES.

Internal data from Open Minded would appear to back that up: Thus far, most of its self-declared “monogamish” users are under 33. In other words, they’re women (and men) who paid off their own student loans, fooled around on Tinder — and grew up with a notion of personal independence much different from the one taught in the 1st century A.D.

Oh, that’s rich. “In other words, they’re women (and men) who paid off their own student loans“, I wonder how many women had their student loans PAID FOR by their now CUCKOLD HUSBANDS. And “grew up with a notion of personal independence much different from the one taught in the 1st century A.D.” as far as I can tell, means no BONDS necessary…

For them, and for their more conventional peers, Jessie has some advice: Talk to your partner about monogamy. Listen “without judgment.” Keep, in all cases, an open mind.

For the men, I would add: ask for a divorce. You will lose half of your s~~~, but you will keep your sanity.

“Whichever it is, make a real choice,” she said. “We’re told we only have enough love for one person. Does that sound right to you?”

Well, I am pretty sure that the concept of loyalty is total alien to women. After all, the caveman days were the s~~~, right? They could f~~~ like monkeys! Of course, there was all the “fighting the elements of nature to survive” thing, but hey, we were not monogamous! So it was better.

Wow… Just… Wow.

I will end this with a question. With this kind of mentality, why, in the name of the nine hells, would ANY MEN have ANY KIND OF RELATIONSHIP WITH WOMEN? And why are WOMEN asking WHERE THE GOOD MEN ARE? You want to f~~~ around don’t you, ladies? Go for it. There is no such thing as relationships. And if MONEY is all you are after, I rather spend it on a hooker.

I am so glad I found Mgtow, cause this is madness…