i was wondering these day about some rather odd scenario. But i would like to share it with you

we all know that many man these day prefer to get out of mainstream. mgtow or hermits or grass eating in japan. many of these man prefer to flip a burger or stay secluded rather than compete in this world

now …as we know mostly men are behind tech revolutions and inovations.as more men opt to not play the game and keep a low profile most likely we will se a slowdown in tech advance

on one side of the coin than can be a bad thing….but on the other  it can be a good one. why? environment degradation. tech is good and science is good. but we all know that tech in consumeristic markets is polluting the environment

can be all that a self regulating scheme on a grand scale pe mother nature?

consumerism + feminism + strange lwas => man opt out => less men develop tech => less new tech to pollute => clean water + happy men going their own way?

or my scenario is dumb and paranoid?

Pushing women in fields such as tech will eventually lead us to going backwards …. because they can’t innovate and are risk adverse. Thus boundaries won’t get pushed.

Men have put there very lives at risk …. test pilots … astronauts etc. Many have died. War always sees huge advances but it was men once again.

So with these men walking away and women incapable of push forward …. there will be a slowing down in every aspect.

This may be good for ‘nature’ but it may also stop someone inventing a solution.

So here’s the deal: next time you catch yourself doing something because you think it might get you laid or please a female (or the opposite, to not do it would prevent you from getting laid or make a female angry) simply do not do it. Let the female get angry and go without the pussy. Save that money and when you’ve got enough of it, cut back your hours and just enjoy yourself.

Honestly, how many of us really need mobile phones to talk to each other? You want to talk to a man, use a CB or HAM radio or, better yet, just meet him at a bar. No need for a phone. And without females, how much money would a man spend going out to dinner in a given month? $20? Zero?

Stop doing anything that you do for females and keep the money for yourself. I promise you’ll see a cleaner, calmer, happier world as a result.

It basically says that the more efficient you are technologically the higher the consumption of resources.  Example:  People used to get crazy about turning off lights to REDUCE energy use.  But, since energy efficient bulbs are on the market, people don’t worry about turning them off anymore and so energy consumption INCREASES.

Wikipedia:  In economics, the Jevons paradox; occurs when technological progress increases the efficiency with which a resource is used (reducing the amount necessary for any one use), but the rate of consumption of that resource rises because of increasing demand. The Jevons paradox is perhaps the most widely known paradox in ecological economics. However, governments and environmentalists generally assume that efficiency gains will lower resource consumption and are an effective policy for sustainability, ignoring the possibility of the paradox arising.

All of this feeds into my notion that the world is a snowball headed for hell; the more you try and SLOW it down, the FASTER it goes.  So put your seat-backs and tray tables in their up-right position cause this mutherfuka is going down.

as for myself i will keep a low profile focusing on developing my neurons and sense of modesty

did you notice that modesty is viewed as a bad thing?

climate change was buffered by the ocean (and it still is). but it is easier to stop

these changes at the start. for example it is easier to solve this problems at 300 ppm co2 rather than 404 ppm as it is now. it is the proverbial snowball effect

this is a very hard nut to crack even with all nations in some combined effort (as US Russia China relations are rather cold now…..)

i did some research about mass extinctions in the past. most bright minds of today agree that we are in the middle of the 6th and it is close in badness to Permian Triassic one that to the K-T one that wiped out the dinos

i think that we are in some very dangerous zone that can even mean the demise of our civilisation as we know it. not in the way of some stupid movie (bang bang we are gone) but in the decades to come we will se states fail, medical systems fail and agriculture fail. on top of this most likely climate refugees – Indus and Yangtze valley to most probalbe candidates