Now where it gets interesting is that, most women want to “marry up” ie. they want to marry a man that earns more than them, so they can fund their lavish lifestyle with her husbands money. The only reason I can think of when a women “marries down” is if she has some sort of sadistic streak in her to absolutely dominate the male (maybe discussion for later).

Another study has come out saying that 75% of women (1/3) would not date or enter a relationship with unemployed men (links below).

If one were to logically look at these data points, it would be no surprise that these feminists are delusional. Suppose they got their wish and achieve higher pay than men, how would they find men if they assert that they would only date/marry up if they are earning equal or more. Anytime I bring this up with some women, they are quite defensive and will in fact resort to ad hominem attacks, cognitive dissonance at its finest… Links below tell me what you guys think.

http://thefederalist.com/2015/05/06/there-is-no-wage-gap-feminists-want-equal-pay-for-unequal-work/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/unemployed-men-survey-its-just-lunch_n_1631289.html

It is interesting to compare what percent of men WOULD date an unemployed woman, and that number, is a shockingly high 66% from the 2nd link you provide!  Only 8% would exclude unemployed women.  Granted, this survey is from It’s Just Lunch!, a dating site catering to professionals.  A lot of women probably join it to find high EP men.  So only 25% of women will date an unemployed man, but 66% of men will date an unemployed woman.  What do you call the 8% of men that won’t date the unemployed women?  SMART.  Haha. At least, if she’s long-term unemployed.

Other surveys are probably more representative than It’s Just Lunch, which their survey numbers indicate, is a haven for gold diggers.  e.g. http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/dating-poll-money-gender-roles-reveals-contradictions-article-1.1810049 indicates a smaller but still significant gap, with 43% of men willing to date a lower-earning woman and only 28% of women willing to date a lower-earning man.

If I re-married, the first thing a woman would demand is ‘upgrade the furniture’, ‘get a fancier car’, etc — at least, the vast majority of women.

When a chick is bugging me with over enthusiastic flirting, and I am not interested in her, then I have a sure fire solution (discovered in high school and used ever since). I let it “accidentally” slip out that I am broke. Works every time, 100% success rate — she is gone, and it was her idea so she will not come back to stalk me later.

In my corporate jockey days I was at a private airfield event in France.

This very well dressed and very well deportmented mature woman came up to the ship and started ‘chatting me up’.

Red flags were flying left right and centre. Widow, unattached, touchy feely and probing questions.

She asked to sit inside but I told here I have to find the captain and ask permission.

She says she thought I was the captain …. and I reply … oh no haha I was the steward.

I’m not kidding … she shot me a look that she had just trodden in dog s~~~. Without saying a word she turned and marched off.

Sad coz I thought I’d make a very sexy steward ?

I always offer up a lower position in these situations. Its kryptonite to them.

I’m still trying to get my head around everything but from what she is saying she is counting unpaid housework, supposedly women do more housework than men. Why they never count yard work, I have no idea. I asked her what about men who live alone, women who live alone etc. She doesn’t have an answer for that but that is where this Pay Gap bulls~~~ is coming from, they are counting your normal chores that they think they should also be paid for.

Typical Leftie nonsense.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-98970/The-generation-girls-boil-egg.html