MGTOWFeminism=Polygamy – MGTOW https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/feed/ Mon, 08 Jun 2020 20:26:10 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.5.14-6684 en-US https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/page/528/#post-1758 <![CDATA[Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/page/528/#post-1758 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:43:52 +0000 ether_ore Being MGTOW myself and of the variety that believes in sexual abstinence for religious reasons, I see an ironic situation taking shape. Feminism seems to be on the path to polygamy. Several factors are contributing to this trend which is only in its beginning stages. I think women’s desires are developing into something looking like this: feminism = socialism = forced dominance by elitists = hive mind = necessitated polygamy. Sure, I know what you’re thinking… I’m nuts and this will never happen. I’M only suggesting that it’s a plausible outcome. Going from feminism to socialism is no big leap. The two go hand in hand because if women will not be dependent on husbands, they will necessarily be dependent on government. And… forced dominance by elitists is what socialism is all about. With feminism being dominant in this particular socialist model, you have a hive mind that seeks to relegate men to irrelevance. Add to this the voluntary decision of some men to go MGTOW and this creates a situation where there will likely be fewer men to perform any service for women, which means several women dependent on one man for sex. By definition, polygamy means a man having more than one “wife”, as in… ‘married’. However, in the scenario I’ve described, the result is the same; the marriage issue notwithstanding. I could be wrong. After all women do not “need” individualized attention or affection. They can turn it on or off at will.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1760 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1760 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:15:33 +0000 VileNord You definitely made some giant leaps there! I think that if anything, a socialist society controlled by an elitist group of feminists wouldn’t care one iota about a man identifying as a MGHOW and would pass legislation that enforces him to toe their line under threat of imprisonment. A feminist controlled society would rape a man of all his dignity and harvest his utility for the benefit of womenkind. If polygamy exists in this hypothetical dystopia, it would be a women with a harem of males, each fulfilling a particular need she had. One for sex, one for complaining, one for listening, one for shopping, etc…

This will never happen though. Men have a vast edge in too many areas of life to allow women to get that far. We would of course rebel and they would suffer tremendous casualties.

Lust for comfort suffocates the soul

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1762 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1762 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:05:08 +0000 ether_ore @vilenord

From my perspective, I think you’re making my point in some ways. For one thing, precedence concerning enforced parentage has been set by women themselves over the issue of abortion. This would make it difficult for them to do an about face on the issue of sovereignty over one’s own body. You could be right about enforcement of involuntary servitude, but you also, yourself suggest that this won’t happen because men won’t allow it to happen. My point was only this: that as long as individual autonomy exists at some basic level, men will be less and less inclined to submit to a relationship with women which has no tangible benefit for men. Couple this with a sufficient number of men respecting the autonomy of women and you have a condition that resembles what I described.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1786 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1786 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 08:36:56 +0000 TheBard I could picture feminists promoting multiple husbands for all females so they get more money, more choices for sex, and keep men down. Men like us wouldn’t fall for it, but there is no shortage of pathetic men who would fall for this and let it happen because having to share pussy with 5 other guys, but knowing he will get at least once every week would be good enough for him. Feminism and socialism do seem a lot alike though as in both involve getting taken care of and women would love to use their bodies to make men take care of them. I am sure all of those hardcore feminists imagine a society where all they do is relax all day and have fun while men go to work and better themselves for a chance to be one of their husbands and get pussy when the woman needs to use it as a weapon.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1788 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1788 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 09:24:49 +0000 Keymaster I have also noticed the rise in polygamy and marveled at a video on some “Anderson Cooper” show (i think)… where a woman had a very pathetic “beta” weakling for all the “support” she needed … and a more “alpha” dude to get the job done in the bedroom. I shuddered at the men who were accepting of this, particularly the studio audience who didn’t say “boo” about it. What a bunch of hypocrites!! When you know that a man will two “wives” would be booed off the stage before he opened his mouth.

The glaring reality is that women today use men to fill certain specific holes in their lives and play certain roles. The gay best friend is there to help boost her self-esteem and take her to the mall to tell her how “faaaabulous” she looks. The husband quietly pays for everything and never pesters her for sex. The boyfriend on-the-sly gives her the ‘gina tingles. And her 400 other male Facebook “friends” are there to “like” everything she posts… and are the back up plan in case one of these “relationships” doesn’t work out.

Until we can reengineer hypergamy out of women’s hindbrains, advocacy for unconstrained polyamory in all but the most backward societies is DOA. Consensual polyamory is a contrived hookup service for undesirable sexual market rejects.

Everything about that picture – and the concept is revolting.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1840 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1840 Sat, 02 Aug 2014 06:52:39 +0000 TheBard

<cite>@mgtow.com said:</cite>
I have also noticed the rise in polygamy and marveled at a video on some “Anderson Cooper” show (i think)… where a woman had a very pathetic “beta” weakling for all the “support” she needed … and a more “alpha” dude to get the job done in the bedroom.

All women do that even when choosing what kind of guy to date in different points in their life. This is a scene from a the game Catherine, which every man needs to play, and what Justin says pretty much describes how women treat us men when looking for relationships.

What I take from that is guys like me and the guy who she is marrying are not good enough for women when they are younger. Us nice guys who are loyal, have decent jobs, and aren’t pigs are only good enough when they want to settle down and have kids. We are not good enough back in their college and early post college days because at that age they can deal with a douche bag guy who treats them bad because he works out and will spend money on them since they are young, but now that they are older and don’t want to put up with that crap they think it is ok to move on to guys like us who have always been good, the guys who had to go without for years because we were too nice and good friends. All those nights we could never find dates anywhere because we weren’t assholes,but years later we are the right guys who they didn’t see until now. That would be no different than a guy in college saying to a girl “sorry but your t~~~ are too small for me. I am young and in college, I want a girl with huge t~~~” then 8 years later coming back to that girl and saying “please date me, that was college me who only liked girls with big t~~~ and I was young back then, you understand?”

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1847 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1847 Sat, 02 Aug 2014 14:06:12 +0000 McQueen Cool find in the media, Bard. I know so many girls like that, but don’t be calling other guys “pigs” for getting the pussay. She threw it at them, remember? The pigs are the bishes who come after you when you just figured them out. These women make me sick. Its like they have not even thought about it for 2 seconds, or feel bad or embarrassed about it.

They never took a minute to think “I didn’t want to dance with this guy in school” or “He once asked me out and I said no. I shouldn’t expect him to date me now. That’s rude.” This thought doesn’t enter their minds. They should be ashamed of themselves and should come crawling on all fours and saying “I was so stupid to pass you up you were good to me when other guys weren’t. Is there any way I can make it up to you?” but pigs will fly before a woman thinks like that. Even when they are desperate and their eggs are drying up, they maintain the same distance “hey remember me? Call me!”. Try again sister. You can start by begging me to let you blow me.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1889 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1889 Sun, 03 Aug 2014 07:50:21 +0000 TheBard No one should ever give that kind of girl a second chance ever. Pretty convenient on their end that they got to have things their way back in college and now that they are older they just happen to realize their mistakes when they meet you again and their eggs are dying. If a woman will not date you when you are younger then you should date her when you are older.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1921 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1921 Sun, 03 Aug 2014 21:46:25 +0000 Crazy Canuck

Add to this the voluntary decision of some men to go MGTOW and this creates a situation where there will likely be fewer men to perform any service for women, which means several women dependent on one man for sex.

I think most men can’t keep up with multiple women, not for a long time anyways. You would need to have gifted genetics and be in very good health to last a long time. Unless you’re young a man can not sex daily when he is required to work. Also STD will probably on the rise, it’s a bad.

Personally I do not care what women do. I wouldn’t have sex with just any woman anyways.

Let’s Talk Sex: Why Too Much and Too Little is Unhealthy! http://www.losethebackpain.com/healthysex.html

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1937 <![CDATA[Reply To: Feminism=Polygamy]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/feminismpolygamy/#post-1937 Mon, 04 Aug 2014 02:59:02 +0000 TheBard

<cite>@crazycanuck said:</cite>
http://www.losethebackpain.com/healthysex.html

Too bad I don’t have a girlfriend. I could easily do the 2x a day for good health lol. My health doesn’t look too good than if not having sex gives you all those symptoms lol.

]]>