Lately, there has been an increase in advocacy among certain progressive groups for the establishment of “Women Only Cities”; places where they can feel safe from the rampant “Rape Culture” and be free to achieve the full potential of women in every aspect of human life. Well, I say “Let’s get behind this one all the way!!!!”

Now, by “All the way”, I mean making it a Female Municipality in EVERY conceivable aspect of the term. I am sure that third wave feminists would agree that there should be no possibility of anyone suggesting skewed statistics, fuzzy math, etc. when it comes to proving once and for all that women, if not oppressed by the lingering “Patriarchy”, would surpass every achievement of their male counterparts.

There are plenty of towns throughout the US that have been depopulated, abandoned, or arrested at some stage of their construction. One could easily be designated for their “Femtopia”. One the day of Incorporation, all men would be expelled from that jurisdiction, and thereafter be forbidden entry (PERIOD). All planning, (re)development, and construction would have to be carried out exclusively by women. Likewise all subsequent governance, industry, maintenance, commerce, administration, and support would have to be performed exclusively by females. To prove their economic viability, they would be independent of any external taxation revenue; no tax money in, no tax money out. To fund this great and noble endeavour, they can simply issue a municipal bond on the public securities market and/or apply for loans from any commercial investment firm (just like any other new town). If there is any truth to even half their claims of female entrepreneurism, they should have investors lining up to fund them at rates well below market index.

Now, we can still have a heart in this matter. Should a woman have male children (BTW: “Male” would mean being born genetically as such), before the age of twelve, they can reside with their mother. After that, the family is free to reside in an outer ward until the manchild exhausts his condition of dependency (as defined by prevailing regulations), provided however, that they cannot work or attend school within the town limits. Again, we would not wish to provide potential detractors with even the slightest basis to claim that academic or vocational achievement ratings are altered by the inclusion of “Favoured Males”.

Again, there will be one overriding law: NO MEN ALLOWED IN TOWN-EVER! Everyone from the mayor to the panhandler must be female.

(P.S. I give it three years, at best 😉 )

Now, that doesn’t mean I would invest in their municipal bonds. I would be more inclined to invest in the subsequent salvage rights option on their infrastructure, except that there wouldn’t be enough left to bother with. Just saying……

P.S. I give it three years, at best

You give them 3 years? You are too kind.

I give them 3 days! 5 days if there is already running water. Maybe a couple of weeks if there is already food in there. But I don’t think they would last a full year on a FEMALE ONLY city. They would kill each other at one point and by 6 months it would be a ghost town, reminiscent of a post apocalyptic movie.

A natural source of chemotherapy on Ruinit, Castle Bravo crater, and other atomic research test sites, a real plus!

Let’s get behind this one all the way!!!!

I am all for it. Who do they call when the air conditioning breaks down? Who do they call if the roof leaks? Ha, ha, nobody — the phones stopped working ages ago!