MGTOW‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female – MGTOW

‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:11:20 +0000

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/06/09/duck-dynasty-star-reveals-childhood-abuse-secret-that-he-hid-for-many-years-it-was-tough/

Apparently, Jep Robertson of the “Duck Dynasty” fame has come forward saying that he was molested by a female when he was a child. This female was a high schooler. This was a time when the school permitted high schoolers and elementary students on the same bus.

The only thing I disagree with Jep on was that he says the “poor girl was probably abused herself.” There is NO defense for such a disgusting act.

Regardless, how much do you want to bet that this story won’t make as huge headlines as the Duggar debacle?

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

RoyDal — Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:41:59 +0000

It’s the old double standard, yet again.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

treelville..miami — Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:47:04 +0000

And there you have it, there’s always someone somewhere willing to absolve her of all guilt due to her gash pass.

"The wounds of honor are self inflicted"

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

Tue, 09 Jun 2015 17:40:27 +0000

By the “logic” of the people getting Josh Duggar fired, shouldn’t we be hunting down the girl that did this to him years ago and have her fired from whatever position she may be holding? Or will she be like Lena Dunham and be completely forgiven of what she’s done? I’m sure we can answer that.

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

Boomhauer — Tue, 09 Jun 2015 18:20:18 +0000

Good ol’ double standard. Feminists will no doubt defend her because she was/is an ’empowered’ woman.

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

Crazy Canuck — Tue, 09 Jun 2015 19:31:01 +0000

That is true people that are abused sometimes abuse others.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:54:36 +0000

It is indeed a true statement, absolutely. The way the media will take it is that the molester had an “excuse” to do what she did. I suppose I worded myself poorly there. I don’t disagree with the fact that the abused become abusers, I only disagree with what seems to be a defense of the girl that did this to him. This story likely won’t make it anywhere past The Blaze, but I think it should be shouted from the rooftops.

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

FreeGhost — Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:44:51 +0000

It’ll just be laughed off. Males are disposable as a sex, don’t you know Chris? Sperm is of abundance and eggs are rare, you are sexist Chris. Stop your woman hating.

P.S. charge your female roommate more on rent, you are getting financially taken advantage of. At least make her give you a BJ. Good day sir.

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:13:37 +0000

Bahaha, thanks for that @freeghost !

I did end up upping her rent and she wasn’t happy. I’d not really want a BJ from her, as it would feel like getting one from a child (seeing how her education is literally not past 2nd grade and she acts like a know-it-all quite frequently). Also, she could use that against me later somehow, and I’d rather not have any chances taken. I’ll just be so happy to have my room back again once I’ve finished using her rent…

Reply To: ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star was Molested by Female

Tue, 16 Jun 2015 03:47:22 +0000

Crazy Canuck wrote:

That is true people that are abused sometimes abuse others.

True, it happens more often than modern academia would like us to admit. They use the old default “oh, her amygdala was just naturally ‘small’ which is a shared trait among sociopaths.” What the f~~~ ever, did you guys hear about the neurologists studying MRIs of sociopaths found out his brain was similar? i.e his amygdala was small, but his family said he was fine, and he was sure he never killed anyone, BUT he instead digressed and used THAT as further evidence to support this growingly popular hypothesis, started by Darwin, Spencer, and Huxely — the hypothesis that says we are primarily BLOOD, and nothing more than blood and soil combined — i.e that we are GENETICS primarily, nurture, only secondly. This is eugenics which is genocide which is at the CORE of progressivism. This theory brings us to the “it must be a village that raises the child” and “there is no need for a biological father” all of this bulls~~~ right here.

Anyways bruvs, brahts, brudders, and armanos CHEERS!