Well here we have serious newspaper calling for a 20% pay cut for men to equalize the gender non existent sex pay gap.

If we want to rally the needed support to solve the problem, we should stop focusing on raising women’s pay, because clearly that hasn’t worked. There’s another way of closing the gap: We should make every man in this country take a 20-per-cent pay cut. Overnight, we’d go from the status quo to pitchforks in the street, all-out political fury.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/how-to-solve-the-gender-pay-gap-heres-an-idea-cut-mens-wages/article24170883/

So the only reason they don’t cut all men’s salaries or, more likely, tax men an extra 20% because….”Gender Pay Gap” is that they’re worried about riots.

They clearly are public calling for more gradual…the heat in the pot full of crabs goes up slowly to boil those crabs. So they are slowly acting against men hoping none will notice.

Well, we notice.

This is the first time I have felt the need for the NRA and protections for my right to bear arms.

They can keep swisting and turning the rules but the one thing men can do that women can’t is survive no matter what hits us.

Hell why not just give the women 10% more money across the work place, take our homes, money, kids … and here we still are.

I’m a f~~~ing c~~~roach … you cant kill me coz … oh look … here comes more … and more.

Nothing they can do can stop me being a man …. NEVER 😆

Who said the Globe and Mail was a serious newspaper?  Over the years, I’ve seen it go from a proper publication to gaudy fishwrap.  It’s become the Sun without the cheesecake photos.

Maybe there is a reason why women can no longer serve on the front lines of a US military operation in a combat position. For the most part women are smaller than men, even if they were the same size as men a woman’s natural percent body fat is higher than men by 3-7%. Ergo even if they did weigh as much as us they would still have less muscle mass = less force can be exerted (see physics, newtons law)

In fact I would go so far as to say that men and women are not equal. We have different body parts, chemistry, thought patterns, objectives and goals. Hell girls your unique just like everyone else.

Also this comment was posted @ the globe and mail:
Following the links, one finds that the source for the unexplained 40% of the gap is a 2007 paper referencing a 2006 paper using data from 1998 full-time workers in the U.S. Does that apply to Canada in 2015? Perhaps we should find out…

The whole *gap* was 20%. Yes, 41% was unexplained, but that means the unaccounted gap was actually 8% or so. This might be due to many things, including women not being as forthright in arguing for raises or higher pay.

Seriously, who doesn’t see this coming?

Somewhere along the way I must have missed a turn when I started working at a civilian job. I get paid to produce for my employer, not to sit there and look pretty and chat. (hell I’d definitely be getting over paid for that).