then watch SEEthemTURN

— correction to the date. Our introductory email to them was on 07,15 —
Sundog pictures followed up with a request for “access to names”. We will post the emails later in this thread.

When we told them we will not represent individuals but we are prepared to speak as a website “like the NewYork times,. 60 minutes or 20/20”…. we never heard from them again.

Oh the smiles, warm handshakes, hand on shoulder f~~~ery. The carefully rehursed understanding look, appreciative nods.

They had the script very well rehursed … “fair … balanced …. a voice …. gone to far now its our time”

I’m not a violent man …. normally … but I will need restraints if I see one of them on the street ….. or better yet …. one one of my flights.

I was in on the first meeting with CSMgtow and BBC.

No kidding! How cool!

I have long since given up being disappointed in what journalists laughingly call “integrity.” Does anyone remember when some TV news magazine show (a rival to 60 Minutes) rigged up a pickup truck with incendiary bombs to make it look dangerous? Does anyone remember all the scams 60 Minutes pulled on people and companies they wanted to take down? I do.

It’s on my very long list of reasons why I won’t subscribe to cable.

And then during the whole of his “documentary” did you notice how often he asked the same question to himself like: “How can this be…?” & “Where did all of these attitudes come from..?”

Well Reggie, just cast you mind back to the stage of your own research on the whole issue, why don’t you..?

I mean to a large degree you can blame yourself as to why you don’t understand these things, man(gina).

Oh you did make some efforts to dig fairly deep into the whole matter but simply not deep enough, simple as that. And I could almost guess why that is.

In journalism some things better keep unresearched because otherwise they lose some of their more dramatic and therefore more controversial impact (which is vitally important to be able to sell a story isn’t it..?). Whilst you had lots and lots of spare time during your lengthy flight over to Roosh (or during your train ride) you could have easily EASILY researched other more moderate and more philosophical youtube channels such as “Groundwork for the metaphyics of mgtow” or similars as well.

But know, you probably thought: “Extreme is (and means) extreme and therefore if I’m not going to research too much, so I can keep it (and its impact) that way, means: easy money to sell it in a yet easier way; these guys are all nutters anyway and it’s not the job of journalism to properly, objectively clarify something… … or is it..?”

Well, you followed all the way through with that part of logic, Reggie. The only thing that modestly stuck out in your favor was that you at least mentioned some of the more modest mgtow views and comments albeit only on the side. Still, other than that you did do us a small favor by giving us some extra publicity and yet plenty more members on our forum (as in the what I would call “beebs-spike” on the research trends just like Keymaster mentioned the other day when the documentary was going live on air…). So for that and for that only in a weird way: cheers Reggie…!

I’m not a violent man …. normally … but I will need restraints if I see one of them on the street ….. or better yet …. one one of my flights.

We wrote to them again after that to confront them about and gave them s~~~ for treating MGTOW that way.
Sound of crickets chirping followed of course.

We were contacted a f~~~-hundred times yesterday “why didn’t you speak to the BBC?”
Because they made no effort to contact or reply.

They had plenty of opportunity and now it’s all over twitter.
And NOW Reggie Yates decides to shut his f~~~ing mouth. Convenient.

And NOW Reggie Yates decides to shut his f~~~ing mouth. Convenient.

Alright: figures…