MGTOWAFVM promotes rape with married men – MGTOW https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/feed/ Tue, 09 Jun 2020 11:20:36 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.5.14-6684 en-US https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/page/339/#post-53925 <![CDATA[AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/page/339/#post-53925 Tue, 19 May 2015 08:14:45 +0000 Crazy Canuck AFVM has an article claiming married men have the right to rape their wives. All I can say that I am glad I have no part of the men’s right movement.

http://www.donotlink.com/framed?700323

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53930 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53930 Tue, 19 May 2015 08:25:12 +0000 sidecar And their wives have the right to rape them in return. In court.

MRA’s are largely merely ineffectual. AVFM are idiots. It’s like they can’t stop at the mistake of getting married, but have to compound their stupidity.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53938 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53938 Tue, 19 May 2015 09:02:35 +0000 MgtowWave MRAs do nothing but p~~~ in the wind.

Getting married is stupid.

Love is a kind of insanity.

Indian men need to wake the f~~~ up.

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53960 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53960 Tue, 19 May 2015 10:23:30 +0000 @mgtowwave

indian men will never “wake up” except for the “higher class” guys, this was explained in an interview with an indian born guy and barbar

check it out 😀

Peace

 

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53988 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53988 Tue, 19 May 2015 12:26:59 +0000 I used to be involved in the MRM. It is important right now to raise conciousness that there is a different perspective from the regular woman good, men bad feminist perspective.

I think they have really made some headway in educating the public.

But they are a paper tiger. All roar, no bite.

MRA’s are losing big time. That’s not their fault. It’s just that things are so out of hand and the feminists have such great power in the professional government culture, not just elected officials, that men will continue to get steam rolled for at least a few more generations.

And over the next few decades this poison will solidify world wide under the U.N. mandate (written by Hillary).

My opinion is that men should go their own way, selfishly and live a happy life. The only one that will care about you is you.

It is the best for the men (most important) and secondarily the best way of teaching women that the basis of their argument that has allowed them to have the hubris to change the legal landscape between men and women is false.

Men don’t need women. With automation of housekeeping, food preparation and soon assisted wombs, women have become irrelevant to the average guy.

And they don’t want him. He should read the memo, take the red pill and get on with a happy, healthy life free from female financial, emotional and physical abuse.

This guy is like a child stomping his feet.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53989 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53989 Tue, 19 May 2015 12:29:30 +0000 Keymaster How the f~~~ can there be “rape” in a marriage?
A marriage contract is a VIP pass to backstage vagina. Anal is still for sale. But vagina is guaranteed.

“Marital Rape”?

What’s next. Is it “molestation” when a fireman rescues a child from a burning orphanage?

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53992 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53992 Tue, 19 May 2015 12:39:20 +0000 Marital rape, please. When people had to take their vows seriously before no fault divorce plenty of women stopped putting out for men upon marriage.

It used to be “loss of affection” was a clear cut cause for divorce. We used to say a woman became “frigid”. In other words, she got the boot with prejudice if he could prove that she refuses to have sex with him.

No men could ever force themselves on their wives legally. That is total bulls~~~. The idea that a woman should have sex with her husband is the real reason feminists 20 years ago made such a stink about the “marital rape” crisis. 5 out of 4 women experienced marital rape in each of their marriages 8 days per week.

Now asking your wife for sex is going to be a “yes means yes” adventure every time you want sex or you risk your freedom and children. Ready to pledge your lifetime sexuality in her hands? Really? I’m sure you trust her…lol.

If I were married I would put a camera in the bedroom if you value your independence and freedom.

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53993 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-53993 Tue, 19 May 2015 12:45:31 +0000 Keymaster Aware of the whole “alientation of affection” thing, but the same woman who is alienating her husband and closing her legs to him, will have no reservation about freely opening them for someone else.. like his friend.

The $3 Million Dollar Bitch
http://www.mgtow.com/audio/3-million-dollar-bitch/

Now when her husband wants some nookie for the $3 million plus property that whore expects to get paid out for NOT F~~~ing her own husband, it’s hardly “rape”. He just wants to have sex and make love to his own “wife”.

“Marital Rape” is a goddam joke. No really. The term is a joke…. just like the concept of a “wife”.

… who some schmuck is ordered to pay $3 million + property for NOT f~~~ing him, as she spreads her legs for his friend for free, before giggling about it on the radio.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-54002 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-54002 Tue, 19 May 2015 13:21:16 +0000 BrainPilot Someone help me here if I’m confused, as I have not yet had my coffee this morning and am still a little sleepy from a late night last night…

A response to this article makes the point that marriage is a general consent for sex, and so marital rape (sex without consent) cannot occur.  Feminists, and at least one mangina in the comments clearly disagree.  I suspect that for at least some (if not most) women, the idea of a general, binding and permanent consent for sex is abhorrent because it eliminates the possibility of raising the price later, when an increased demand in exchange for sex might be met, but prevented by the previous consent.

I would say that if marriage is not the general consent for sex, that feminists should, for as long as they can, continue to pretend that it is.  For as soon as it becomes generally recognized that it is not, there will be an immediate re-examination of what it is women actually offer in a marriage.  They don’t bring property as they all want to ‘marry up’ financially.  They are not offering a man children as everyone knows that the children of any marriage belong to her, and women are not giving up this enormous advantage they have in divorce courts.  In fact, feminists oppose mandatory paternity testing in order to maintain the ability to assign the cost of ‘her’ children to whichever man in her environment is the highest producer.  And now the feminism has freed women to ‘slut it up’ without consequence, there is certainly an alternate supply for the single man.

This assertion that marriage is not a general consent for sex is a thinning of the already very thin veil concealing what giant liabilities women really are in the context of a marriage contract.  If in the context of a marriage contract the children are not his, the resources he produces are not his, and vagina access is not his, then what actually is being offered to him in exchange for signing?  If marriage is not the general consent for sex, then consent for sex (even after marriage) will have to be re-purchased again and again at a price fluctuating to whatever is the daily maximum the market can bear, from a monopolized source, by a captive buyer.

Who the hell is going to agree to be a shopper in THAT market?

 

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

]]>
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-54007 <![CDATA[Reply To: AFVM promotes rape with married men]]> https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/afvm-promotes-rape-with-married-men/#post-54007 Tue, 19 May 2015 13:37:40 +0000 xgreenlanternox

Aware of the whole “alientation of affection” thing, but the same woman who is alienating her husband and closing her legs to him, will have no reservation about freely opening them for someone else.. like his friend. The $3 Million Dollar Bitch http://www.mgtow.com/audio/3-million-dollar-bitch/ Now when her husband wants some nookie for the $3 million plus property that whore expects to get paid out for NOT F~~~ing her own husband, it’s hardly “rape”. He just wants to have sex and make love to his own “wife”. “Marital Rape” is a goddam joke. No really. The term is a joke…. just like the concept of a “wife”. … who some schmuck is ordered to pay $3 million + property for NOT f~~~ing him, as she spreads her legs for his friend for free, before giggling about it on the radio.

These are real stories and not staged right??? This s~~~ is so far out there that it’s hard to believe!

]]>