Given he is left with very little anyway I would just quit my job and therefore reduce the amount of alimony she could receive.

I’d really like to know how BLACK her soul is to be able to accept it.

Women could change this and end this crap TODAY. But they never will – because they are greedy, selfish c~~~s and the legal system knows it. Imagine what kind of a s~~~ storm it would create if the ex-wife said “your honor? No disrespect, but F~~~ YOU. Whatever you award me I’m going to give to him back…. and HE will decide what I was worth as HIS wife. I wasn’t married to you, you piece of s~~~. And I thank my personal God for it. How the f~~~ do you live with yourself?”…..,.. and then she turns to her husband and says “I loved you. I’m sorry it didn’t work out. I want you to decide what you think is fair”.

She would make world headlines. But there isn’t a woman on Earth who has the morality.
She will take every last dime even it breaks him and feel good about it.

I don’t know how these women live with themselves.

No, no. She is to keep his mansion.

The alimony portion is just pure garbage.  The are only 3 possible reasons from alimony.

1 – That women are inferior to men in general, and therefore deserving of support. If that’s the case then there should be no attempts for equality anywhere and women should get alimony from the state for simply existing .

2 – That the woman forgo her career for the sake of the marriage.  First you’d need to prove that.  You cannot say a waitress making minimum wage would have been a CEO if she hadn’t gotten married.  Second, are you saying the man doesn’t sacrifice his career for the sake of the marriage?  Where would he be without the marriage.  Third, she took the risk, why is she immune to the losses that come with risk?

3 – That the woman actually supported her husband’s career and made him more successful.  That she somehow earned that alimony.  If this is true, then she earned the benefits of said support while married.  She is no longer providing said support, while should she still receive the benefits?

There’s no good argument for alimony.  I’d say it will gone in 10 years.

Child support is a different matter.  I see it as a catch-22 situation.  However, this man’s case, child support should have never been calculated based on severance package, it should be based on current expected salary.  In my particular case, my base salary hasn’t changed much since my divorce, basically cost of living raises.  However, what has changed dramatically is the yearly bonus and employee stock.  None of this is guaranteed from year to year, and therefore, not considered part of my income for consideration of child support.

The tax aspect really p~~~es me off.  The fact that I am taxed on money I am not allowed to spend as I see fit is ridiculous.  Tax should be paid by the receiver of the child support.  They won’t ever do this though, as they rather tax me at the higher tax bracket, then her at the lower tax bracket. I’d even  be willing to pay more in child support to cover the additional taxes.  Hell, I’d be happy to give everything I pay and in taxes for child support to my kids and see them benefit from it then the government.  Think about it, the government makes the interest you pay on your home mortgage tax free, but the want the tax on child support?

they see anything and start squacking ‘MINE, MINE, MINE”

Bitches see this and cheer, and then in the next breath bemoan that no guy wants to commit.  F~~~ them.

“Hey, she has a vagina, so you should be happy to be her workhorse/slave.” -Female expectations in a nutshell.